Vidahost - UK Web Hosting
Vidahost - UK Web Hosting


ducavis

Members
  • Content count

    2,521
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About ducavis

  • Rank
    First Team Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

1,816 profile views
  1. Wouldn't pay the £50m Southampton want for him because I feel it might be a case of him standing out in a small team. Would rather pay Alderweild's rumoured release clause as he has shown over a 3yr period that he is very good. Would rather kee faith with Christensen though.
  2. Deal only makes sense if you structure it like the Martial/Renato Sanchez one. You pay £30m tops outright going up to £80m if he reaches certain milestones.
  3. Is Fulham's Sessengon the new Bale? For a 16yr old wingback, he seems to score a fair amount of goals
  4. Do we have a buy back clause on Romeu?
  5. Icardi once & on course to hit it again this season (72goals in 143 games), Belotti should hit 20+ also. They are also both 23, so not even close to their peak. You are right about Dembele but he is potentially a world class RW.
  6. Icardi, Belotti, Werner & Dembele (Dor) off my head.
  7. My problem is even if you convince him to stay till the summer, can he be trusted to keep a cool head and still deliver? Will we see a return of the bib throwing incident if he is subbed mid-game? He just doesn't seem the type to keep his head if he doesn't have his way.
  8. Thing is he has said he doesn't like playing as a RB, and when he has played there he has looked average. Agree with Wallosh, there is no point signing players just to bulk up our numbers if we are not improving our 1st 11.
  9. Deal makes no sense no matter how it is spun. Why would Swansea sell him in January when it will take probably double what they get to replace him? It's just like the Defoe to West Ham deal, it's a non-starter. Why would Llorente also want to leave a team where he is guaranteed starts to come and warm the bench here? Costa missed only one game in the first half, Llorente would be lucky to get 3 starts if Costa keeps his calm head & doesn't get injured. The lack of a mental strength to fight to dig Swansea out of their hole is enough reason to stay far away.
  10. Why not loan him out to a Hull or a Bournemouth for the rest of the season so he can get games in a calmer environment like Wilshere?
  11. Can't see any PL team loaning him & giving him enough mins. His wages would prevent any championship team from touching him. Still insist he should have gone abroad at the beginning. As things stand he has wasted another season.
  12. We have a buyback clause on Thorgan Hazard which expires end of Jan I think, we better be activating it and loaning him back to them till the end of the season. Will be shocked if he is still at Borussia Monch next season with the form he is in.
  13. In the minority but I definitely would. How many players have left Arsenal who are renowned for being injury prone & ended up not getting injured often. Van Persie, Fabregas etc. It is just a loan deal, and if it doesn't work out we have no future commitments. I'd rather him than go for a last minute £20m+ midfielder from Serie A.
  14. Hell no! He isn't included in the Dutch squad because he still feels pain in his knee, we need to stay far away. He isn't an upgrade on what we have, and no one has an idea how Zouma will get on after his injury.