Some of the players that played tonight really aren't good enough, baring in mind that you need a squad and not just a starting 11 we seem to have far too many players that wouldn't get near the team sheet of the other three that will be battling it out for the PL (okay the scum will only ever win cups but I included them anyway).
Kalou - he should have produced something by now, he can't keep missing from 2 yards out, and failing to deliver a decent final ball - ever!
Pizzaro - He's more suited to someone like Boro.
Sheva - I stand by my first impression - the worst signing in the history of the premier league, he will not come good no matter how much we play him.
SWP - So much like Jesper Gronkjear(???spelling?), quick, thick and sh*t.
Ben Tal Haim - I kind of quite like him, but that doesn't make him nearly good enough.
I've deliberately not included Sidwell and Malouda because I don't think we've seen enough of them yet to judge.
Of the above, I think it's okay to have a couple that are around the fringes of the firrst team - you know if you have to play them they'll do a job but they will be a bit of a weak link. We're rellying on these players week in and week out.
Is anyone else a bit concerned?
How good are our first team?
Started by
Barn
, Dec 11 2007 10:43 PM
#1
Posted 11 December 2007 - 10:43 PM
#2
Posted 11 December 2007 - 11:04 PM
It's hard to argue against any of your points there Barn, but I'm sure someone will come along.
Kalou, he's young and gets into great scoring positions I could wait till May to see if he can find his scoring boots.
Pizza, SWP,and Sheva agree 100%
Tel-boy I think is good back
Kalou, he's young and gets into great scoring positions I could wait till May to see if he can find his scoring boots.
Pizza, SWP,and Sheva agree 100%
Tel-boy I think is good back
#3
Posted 11 December 2007 - 11:25 PM
I both agree and disagree.
Sheva will perhaps not reach the level he played at with AC Milan but I think he will be quite useful if we play him right.
Today we played attacking football with two strikers and Sheva was good. Too bad he only played one half. Put him alone with two wingers and he won't play well.
Pizarro hasn't played much so I think we have to wait to really judge him. Tonight he looked good, but his finishing was awful.
Kalou is still young and I think he can become really good. He gets into position but his main problem is hitting the net. I think he will learn to do that eventually. The question is: do we wait and perhaps get a world class striker in a few seasons (perhaps more) or do we sell him now and get an older striker who knows how to score?
I think Kalou will score more goals now that we play more attacking football. Just wait and see.
Ben Haim. Well, he was good at Bolton but he hasn't proved himself at Chelsea. We should perhaps give him more time to prove himself. Can't expect him to come in and be great immediately. Also, he's not really used to only play a few games every know and then.
Sweepy. Ah, little Sweepy. If he can learn how to cross the ball then I say we should keep him. That should be too hard to learn, right?
Sheva will perhaps not reach the level he played at with AC Milan but I think he will be quite useful if we play him right.
Today we played attacking football with two strikers and Sheva was good. Too bad he only played one half. Put him alone with two wingers and he won't play well.
Pizarro hasn't played much so I think we have to wait to really judge him. Tonight he looked good, but his finishing was awful.
Kalou is still young and I think he can become really good. He gets into position but his main problem is hitting the net. I think he will learn to do that eventually. The question is: do we wait and perhaps get a world class striker in a few seasons (perhaps more) or do we sell him now and get an older striker who knows how to score?
I think Kalou will score more goals now that we play more attacking football. Just wait and see.
Ben Haim. Well, he was good at Bolton but he hasn't proved himself at Chelsea. We should perhaps give him more time to prove himself. Can't expect him to come in and be great immediately. Also, he's not really used to only play a few games every know and then.
Sweepy. Ah, little Sweepy. If he can learn how to cross the ball then I say we should keep him. That should be too hard to learn, right?
#4
Posted 11 December 2007 - 11:40 PM
I'm amazed at the patience shown towards Kalou on this forum. My boys and I have decided that his first name isn't Saloman but Dussan Taffa.
#5
Posted 11 December 2007 - 11:43 PM
"Backbiter":b8cqa76n said:
I'm amazed at the patience shown towards Kalou on this forum. My boys and I have decided that his first name isn't Saloman but Dussan Taffa.
{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif
I remember feeling a tad guilty when I wrote him off quite early on as it is only fair to give him more of a chance to prove himself however so far I am still looking to be proved wrong. I see him as a Middlesbrough striker just now!
#6
Posted 12 December 2007 - 12:48 AM
"Barn":1j4xnpuo said:
Sheva - I stand by my first impression - the worst signing in the history of the premier league, he will not come good no matter how much we play him.
Nonsense. He's not even the worst Chelsea-record-fee, striker-whose-name-begins-with-"S" signing in Prem history. Chris Sutton, anyone?
Mind you, when Chelsea-era Sheva is the second-best finisher in the squad, you've got some pretty serious depth problems up front.
#7
Posted 12 December 2007 - 08:44 AM
£30m for a player that most clubs in the league wouldn't take on a free transfer makes him the worst ever signing in my opinion!
As for Kalou, he's not a 17 year old that looks promising, he's well into his 20's and been around for a few years, he should be offering us some sort of an end product by now. Same for SWP!
As for Kalou, he's not a 17 year old that looks promising, he's well into his 20's and been around for a few years, he should be offering us some sort of an end product by now. Same for SWP!
#8
Posted 12 December 2007 - 12:54 PM
I agree with Barn, if Sheva does not pick up, which is unlikely now he has been a waste of money and time. What makes it more frustrating is when we signed him he was a world class striker but now he cant even control a ball, let alone finish. What chance do we have against Arsenal with Gallas and Toure marking him?!
Again i agree with Kalou comment, i was patient up until a few weeks back. He shows promise when he gets around people but then he will try and get through three or four rather than play it easy and as for his finishing - he is no striker that is going to keep us in title chase without Drogba.
I think Pizarro is ok. He has a nice touch and plays clever balls around the box, problem is he wont score enough. If we bought someone or when Drogba is back he could work with another.
Ben Haim i think is ok purely because he is really a sub, with JT and Riccy fit and probably even Alex i dont think we will see too much of him.
Wright-philips, there is something i like about him but it think the jury is still out. If we could buy a top right winger then he may have to go!
Again i agree with Kalou comment, i was patient up until a few weeks back. He shows promise when he gets around people but then he will try and get through three or four rather than play it easy and as for his finishing - he is no striker that is going to keep us in title chase without Drogba.
I think Pizarro is ok. He has a nice touch and plays clever balls around the box, problem is he wont score enough. If we bought someone or when Drogba is back he could work with another.
Ben Haim i think is ok purely because he is really a sub, with JT and Riccy fit and probably even Alex i dont think we will see too much of him.
Wright-philips, there is something i like about him but it think the jury is still out. If we could buy a top right winger then he may have to go!
#9
Posted 12 December 2007 - 01:12 PM
"Barn":3ifen55d said:
£30m for a player that most clubs in the league wouldn't take on a free transfer makes him the worst ever signing in my opinion!
They might not take him now, but when we signed him £30m wasn't that bad.
#10
Posted 12 December 2007 - 01:31 PM
30 wasn't that bad???? Really???? I thought everyone agreed he was overpriced, but hopefully worth it when we bought him.
Sadly much as I like the guy, he is now looking like the worst signing in the history of the Prem. Sounds like an exaggeration, but is probably true.
Sadly much as I like the guy, he is now looking like the worst signing in the history of the Prem. Sounds like an exaggeration, but is probably true.
#11
Posted 12 December 2007 - 01:48 PM
Now I'm not Sheva'a biggest fan, I was, but not any more, but to label him the worst ever premiership signing is a bit harsh.
Ask Alex Ferguson what he thinks about Veron.
Ask Alex Ferguson what he thinks about Veron.
#12
Posted 12 December 2007 - 03:04 PM
But they got a decent chunk of money back on Veron, I bet we don't for Sheva.
#13
Posted 12 December 2007 - 03:08 PM
they got 13 million back for him, not a huge amount. Plus he produced zero for Man utd, where as at least Sheva has come up with the goods on a couple of occasions.
#14
Posted 12 December 2007 - 03:36 PM
Well I gues we will see, as he will have his chance to shine when Didier is at the ACN, but while I would love to be proved wrong, as you can't fault Sheva's effort, I doubt I will be.
30 mill for a striker who's lost it, and, as Barn pointed out, will get us sod all if we sell him, is a pretty dreadful outcome. Only ones that come close are Veron and perhaps Sutton, but neither were (quite) as high profile, or expensive, when they arrived.
Like I said, I hate to be right about it (I even bought a Sheva shirt when we signed him for Christ's sake) but I reckon I am. {SMILIES_PATH}/icon_sad.gif
30 mill for a striker who's lost it, and, as Barn pointed out, will get us sod all if we sell him, is a pretty dreadful outcome. Only ones that come close are Veron and perhaps Sutton, but neither were (quite) as high profile, or expensive, when they arrived.
Like I said, I hate to be right about it (I even bought a Sheva shirt when we signed him for Christ's sake) but I reckon I am. {SMILIES_PATH}/icon_sad.gif
#15
Posted 12 December 2007 - 03:49 PM
"midlandblue":1rrfu34x said:
they got 13 million back for him, not a huge amount. Plus he produced zero for Man utd, where as at least Sheva has come up with the goods on a couple of occasions.
Come up with the goods? Apart from decent 1 goal away to Spurs he has done not a great deal else.
Have a look a the sides he's scored against to see what I mean!
We will not get any money back for Sheva and we're still paying the bloke over £120k per week!! (almost £500k per month!!!) Worst deal ever, you bet!!
Regardless of what we paid for him, do you think anyone else would hire his services for over £120k per week?
And who were the mugs who paid 'that' money for Veron? - to do what? loan him out while paying his wages for a couple of years!!!!!-thats what!!!
If Veron would have played for us against the mighty Derby, Sunderland, Nottingham Forest and Wycombe he might have 'come up with the goods' like Sheva has.
Other chairman must see us come in for a player and start rubbing their hands together! {SMILIES_PATH}/icon_rolleyes.gif
Sheva = An expensive mistake in more ways than one!!!!!
Those who think Roman is receiving good advise, and is an astute businessman need only look at the Veron and Sheva deals to question his judgement on all things Chelsea.
#16
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:16 PM
"BLUENUT":3qfy0e9x said:
"midlandblue":3qfy0e9x said:
they got 13 million back for him, not a huge amount. Plus he produced zero for Man utd, where as at least Sheva has come up with the goods on a couple of occasions.
Come up with the goods? Apart from decent 1 goal away to Spurs he has done not a great deal else.
Equalizer away to Porto last year, equalizer away to Valencia last year . . . That's three major knockout ties that Sheva had a significant role in our winning. Plus he's also scored a few league goals. Sheva hasn't done nearly enough to come close to justifying his fee, but I don't think he's the worst signing in Premiership history. Again, how exactly has he been worse value than Sutton?
#17
Posted 12 December 2007 - 07:28 PM
Sheva hasn't been playing well that is a fact, but who could have known that one of the best strikers in the world turn out to be misfiring old man in one night for us. In fact he isn't misfiring for his country where they play in formation suitable for Sheva.
I think Sheva is very sensitive guy and everything that has happened and said has effected his play. I think he is very sympathetic guy and I wish him all the best... He still could turn out one of the best strikers in the league, but not with the formation we are playing.
I really feel sorry that he is suffering..And don't start that "he's making 120k a week" talk. He isn't paying it for himself and he didn't negotiate that salary for himself.
I think Sheva is very sensitive guy and everything that has happened and said has effected his play. I think he is very sympathetic guy and I wish him all the best... He still could turn out one of the best strikers in the league, but not with the formation we are playing.
I really feel sorry that he is suffering..And don't start that "he's making 120k a week" talk. He isn't paying it for himself and he didn't negotiate that salary for himself.
#18
Posted 12 December 2007 - 08:30 PM
"evissy":16uoj4a3 said:
I really feel sorry that he is suffering..And don't start that "he's making 120k a week" talk. He isn't paying it for himself and he didn't negotiate that salary for himself.
bu he did decide to come here, he could have easily stayed in Milan and won some trophies with them then retired in the MLS in his later thirties. If he were still playing in the serie A I do beleive he would be among the top scorers.
#19
Posted 12 December 2007 - 09:54 PM
"BLUENUT":j5uz3yg7 said:
"midlandblue":j5uz3yg7 said:
they got 13 million back for him, not a huge amount. Plus he produced zero for Man utd, where as at least Sheva has come up with the goods on a couple of occasions.
Come up with the goods? Apart from decent 1 goal away to Spurs he has done not a great deal else.
Have a look a the sides he's scored against to see what I mean!
We will not get any money back for Sheva and we're still paying the bloke over £120k per week!! (almost £500k per month!!!) Worst deal ever, you bet!!
Regardless of what we paid for him, do you think anyone else would hire his services for over £120k per week?
And who were the mugs who paid 'that' money for Veron? - to do what? loan him out while paying his wages for a couple of years!!!!!-thats what!!!
If Veron would have played for us against the mighty Derby, Sunderland, Nottingham Forest and Wycombe he might have 'come up with the goods' like Sheva has.
Other chairman must see us come in for a player and start rubbing their hands together! {SMILIES_PATH}/icon_rolleyes.gif
Sheva = An expensive mistake in more ways than one!!!!!
Those who think Roman is receiving good advise, and is an astute businessman need only look at the Veron and Sheva deals to question his judgement on all things Chelsea.
Is the end of this directed at me Bluenut?
I wont bother replying to every paragraph as we have been through it all and I think we ought to just agree to disagree before people get sick of reading our debates and before we start competing in who's supported the club longest but if the last bit is aimed at me I will say that I do think Abromovich is a good and astute businessman,
we know Sheva has not set the league alight but that is something I for one would not have guessed and if the team had played to his strengths from the off we still dont know if he would have been better,
Veron again looked a great player until he went to UTD and although that was again a dissapointment Roman does back it up with his own money and try again,
I dont think he has done too bad by us for trying.
#20
Posted 14 December 2007 - 08:27 AM
It wasn't aimed at you, but there are some that seems to think whatever Roman does is correct because he is a good businessman and has loads of money - so he must know what he's doing. Well apart from being a close friend of the Russian PM, I don't know much about his dealings, but alot of Putin's ex-school mates have wound up with alot of STATE resources, which they sold on for massive profits!
Anyway, not alot of the advice he's received has been top quality, the Sheva and Veron deal go somway to prove it. (do you think they were value for money deals?) There are to many costly errors to list to be quite honest.
Anyway, not alot of the advice he's received has been top quality, the Sheva and Veron deal go somway to prove it. (do you think they were value for money deals?) There are to many costly errors to list to be quite honest.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



Sign In
Create Account

Back to top








