Jump to content


bisright1

Members
  • Content Count

    661
  • Donations

    £0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About bisright1

  • Rank
    On the Bench

Recent Profile Visitors

2,412 profile views
  1. bisright1

    Alvaro Morata

    I dont think we do though, Diego has been pants since he left us.
  2. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    For me Terry and lampard can't be rivalled by hazard. They were the best in a top 3/4 side in Europe. They broke the mould. Hazard...he's a great player. But he's not consistent enough for me and as controversial as it may sound, I think he makes the team worse more often than he makes it better. Too often it's "without hazard we wouldn't have won" and when hazard has an off day, we also look bad. I wouldn't be surprised if he went in the summer and we improved.
  3. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    Well aside from the fact no one will buy bale, it's the price. It's too much for a player of his age, of his star power etc. If it's 100m then that'll be cash + kovacic. And realistically they hold the power
  4. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    Madrid were never in a million years going to spend 200m on hazard.
  5. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    Madrid won't pay 100m
  6. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    I don't think they bid 35m cash
  7. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    Written transfer requests dont really mean anything at his age. People stick them in because of the bonus they forego. I doubt he has a loyalty bonus. I wouldnt believe everything read in the papers anyway on this.
  8. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    I'm the last one to jump on the media hates us bandwagon. But the fact a former average Tottenham player said hazard should leave Chelsea for a bigger club was the second biggest story on BBC sport is madness
  9. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    PSA We can lose every single home grown player in our squad and still be okay. The rules are a limit of non home grown. We currently have room for one non home grown player
  10. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    I'm just saying you're undercooking it. Pulisic is definitely more proven. Some posters here have a very distorted view on players value.
  11. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    Renato sanches
  12. bisright1

    Callum Hudson-Odoi

    More? Pulisic has 100 games at top flight. He's far and away a proven player and ticks every box our scouts look for. We all think CHO will be a better player, but there's scant evidence to say he definitely will. However, if we decide to say CHO is worth 60m then I'll be fine with that.
  13. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    I wouldn't sell him for 60m. I'd let his contract run down.
  14. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    But every single idiot knows he is only going to go to Madrid. So there is no competition. Meaning no other club is driving up his price. Unlike Pulisic. Pulisic is young, AMERICAN, and has 10 years ahead of him. Emphasis on the word potential, he has bigger market potential than someone with 3 years left at the top If hazard sells for 100m I will be absolutely shocked. I think he will go for 60m.
  15. bisright1

    Eden Hazard

    Pulisic is 20 and had other clubs sniffing around, argument can also be made that Pulisic has greater market potential. Madrid won't pay 100m for hazard because they don't need to. If they offer 60m we will be forced to take it or let him go for free in a year.

×