hephzibah

Terrible response. You've said Palmer's passing is fine. So wouldn't you rather go for a player whose passing is fine than go for Gallagher who can do nothing.
I have said even if Palmer's passing is not good, he's still better than Gallagher. Do you disagree that Palmer is better than Gallagher?
You say Palmer cannot pass as much as Fabregas can pass, but at least you said Palmer's passing is fine. So it's better you have a Palmer than you have a Gallagher who cannot pass at all.

Please stop talking about the midfield if you want Gallagher in the Midfield. With all the players Chelsea have, how did Gallagher get into the starting line-up?

Enzo remains who he is, he never lowers his game or increases his game. You either like him or you don't like him. 
Now Chelsea fans say it is a midfield of Gallagher, Enzo and Caicedo, so even if Gallagher spoils the party, it is a Midfield of Gallagher, Enzo and Caicedo, they must all take the blame.
Instead of removing Gallagher and playing a better midfield trio, they won't do that.

The first half was bad, if we had played in the first half like we played in the second half, maybe the scoreline would have been 8-0.

Since Gallagher is the only player playing well in the team and you say Caicedo is not playing well, maybe we should clone nine other Gallaghers and play ten Gallaghers with the goalkeeper. I think many Chelsea fans will like that.
For Caicedo, there are different kinds of DMs in football. Barcelona played for many years with Busquests and he wasn't the most rugged DM in football.
It all depends on his partner. We may have an offensive style with Enzo as his partner, that can make us score a lot of goals but concede a few goals. But if his partner is both not very good defensively and not good offensively (this is what is happening now), then we will concede goals and yet not score much goals.

Not really bleeding circles. These are the truths. Enzo and Caicedo are definitely better than Gallagher.

Definitely our strongest forward, who knows if Pochetino will do it especially if Enzo is fit, he knows he has to start Enzo and Caicedo so that the owners will not complain, and he always want to play Gallagher ( I don't know why), so he will play Gallagher as no 8, and sacrifice either Palmer or Noni.
This is why I hate Gallagher. Just imagine how explosive this our forward would have been, but Gallagher does not allow us to play it.

Check my previous posts, I've talked about why people are saying Gallagher is better than Enzo and Caicedo this season. He's not better than them. They are better than him.

After some of the lovely passes we have seen Enzo do this season, you still think he is overrated, you are dumb.

You don't even want to hide your stupidity. Who is Enzo Fernandes? A midfielder. Not a defensive midfielder, so he's not expected to be making all the tackles in the world for you.
He's more of a central midfielder. What is the job of a central midfielder? He's to connect the defense to the attack. That means he should be able to pass the ball well to the attackers, he should be able to get the ball from the defenders and pass it to the attackers.
That is what I just said, he can pass the ball well. Concerning his price tag, you can go and fight with the Benfica President (if I'm correct) that his fee is too high, then he will not sell him to us. If you keep complaining about players'prices, no team will sell any player to us, the prices of players all over the world have gone up, we all know that already, it is foolish to keep complaining about players' prices.
Players are different. Midfielders are different. Pirlo is different from Xavi, Xavi is different from Iniesta, Iniesta is different from Gerrard, Gerrard is different from Lampard and Lampard is different from Kevin De Bruyne, KDB is different from Enzo.
Don't expect Enzo to be like Lampard. Lampard was more forward, he had a very good shot. Enzo can't do some of these things because he's more of a deep lying midfielder, he keeps making things happening in the midfield, but he is not very hot in attack, he supplies the attackers and allow them to do their job.
Enzo is different from Lampard. He is worth his price tag. Stop all the hate.
So you see you are more of the moron now.
 

After some of the lovely passes we have seen Enzo do this season, you still think he is overrated, you are dumb.

I've said that all season. Makes it difficult to support Chelsea.

Even if the board are crap at judging top talent they haven't misjudged all the signings who have already been successful at a good level.
The fact that poch cannot instill discipline, organisation or a style of play with players in proper positions is 100% down to the weakness of the manager.
The amount of bookings we get for petulance is criminal, it has to stop but I am doubting poch's ability to put some discipline and steel into these players.

It's a broken world, nothing is right in the world, just so bad.

You never see what others do, you only see what Gallagher do. There is a reason why the market value of Enzo and Caicedo last summer was 100m plus last summer, and many clubs didn't want to buy Gallagher last summer. I'm sure the market value of Gallagher last summer was around 30m

Who is not a superstar among the players that started for United against Galatasaray yesternight? Who is not a superstar among the first eleven of City. 
Maybe Haaland is not a superstar. Are we supposed to be quarelling about playing a better player over an inferior player? We are fans, at least we should be thinking about the team winning first before thinking about playing a mediocre player and having a balance between mediocre players and good players.
You have great players, then you want to use mediocre players instead, because you want to have mediocre players and good players in your team, you call it balance. That's a stupid balance.
I watch football to win, when we don't win, but we gave it a go, I'm still happy, but the terrible thing is not to even think of winning. When we play PlayStation, we all want to win, I wonder why you will want to play mediocre players and good players together.
When Real Madrid was winning three champions league trophies in few years, did they play mediocre players and good players together?
To support your playing Gallagher, you just tell all forms of lies, you say he has been in the team based on merit, based on what merit? Is he a DM? We should be using Enzo and Caicedo in deeper positions in the Midfield, can he bench any of them? 
Is he an AM? We should have been using Palmer as our AM, can he bench Palmer? Based on merit, why should he be playing?
Madueke and Mudryk should have been starting on our wings. So on what merit should Gallagher have been starting?
We have exciting players in our attack just like Arsenal has Saka, Martinelli and Odegaard, these players are so important to Arsenal, we have Palmer, Mudryk and Madueke, but instead for Chelsea fans to like them, they hate them.
Why do Arsenal fans like their own players while Chelsea fans hate their own players.

Who is not a superstar among the players that started for United against Galatasaray yesternight? Who is not a superstar among the first eleven of City. 
Maybe Haaland is not a superstar. Are we supposed to be quarelling about playing a better player over an inferior player? We are fans, at least we should be thinking about the team winning first before thinking about playing a mediocre player and having a balance between mediocre players and good players.
You have great players, then you want to use mediocre players instead, because you want to have mediocre players and good players in your team, you call it balance. That's a stupid balance.
I watch football to win, when we don't win, but we gave it a go, I'm still happy, but the terrible thing is not to even think of winning. When we play PlayStation, we all want to win, I wonder why you will want to play mediocre players and good players together.
When Real Madrid was winning three champions league trophies in few years, did they play mediocre players and good players together?
To support your playing Gallagher, you just tell all forms of lies, you say he has been in the team based on merit, based on what merit? Is he a DM? We should be using Enzo and Caicedo in deeper positions in the Midfield, can he bench any of them? 
Is he an AM? We should have been using Palmer as our AM, can he bench Palmer? Based on merit, why should he be playing?
Madueke and Mudryk should have been starting on our wings. So on what merit should Gallagher have been starting?
We have exciting players in our attack just like Arsenal has Saka, Martinelli and Odegaard, these players are so important to Arsenal, we have Palmer, Mudryk and Madueke, but instead for Chelsea fans to like them, they hate them.
Why do Arsenal fans like their own players while Chelsea fans hate their own players.

You never see what others do, you only see what Gallagher do. There is a reason why the market value of Enzo and Caicedo last summer was 100m plus last summer, and many clubs didn't want to buy Gallagher last summer. I'm sure the market value of Gallagher last summer was around 30m

Thanks.

This is why the team is not doing well. Mudryk came in against City and created a goal, Madueke hit the woodwork the other day. They are not bad players.
But you won't get the best out of them playing Gallagher as no 8, Palmer, Mudryk, Madueke, Caicedo and Enzo should play together in our midfield. This is what we are saying.
Gallagher is not a creative player, he can't create chances for them. Palmer should play as no 8, then Mudryk and Madueke will be ok. 
It isn't a funny thing.

We've played many games in the premier league this season, he hasn't given both Mudryk and Madueke proper chances this season, every other player has been given good chances to play, but not Mudryk and Madueke, I'm not sure any of them have started three matches for us in the premier league this season, we have better midfielders this season, they should be allowed to play with them to prove themselves. 
Mudryk was expected to be a good player when we bought him, the owners should be asking him questions about Mudryk. Mudryk travels to Ukraine and plays well, but the manager doesn't use him at Chelsea.

Who were the players that was available, that they could have bought, that they didn't buy? Who are the bad players they bought?

Who were the players that was available, that they could have bought, that they didn't buy? Who are the bad players they bought?

You didn't read my earlier posts. Read the last two pages of this thread, you will see my posts, and you will understand what I'm saying.