What's new

The CFC FINANCE topic

Our current transfer model will inevitably mean we will find ourselves having to sell a Palmer, Estevao or Caicedo at some point if results dip below CL qualification. Whether we want to or not.

When we sail so close to the wind we will eventually get caught out

 
The attack was not good enough, I firmly believe we have elevated our attack this year. We only had Jackson as a striker FFS and injured Marc Guiu!
Click to expand...
Really strange example to use when all summer our allegedly Phenomenal Directors are desparately trying to move on Jackson to enable other purchases but cannot due to their own over inflated valuation of an average player and a completely stupid 9 year contract.

 
Really strange example to use when all summer our allegedly Phenomenal Directors are desparately trying to move on Jackson to enable other purchases but cannot due to their own over inflated valuation of an average player and a completely stupid 9 year contract.
Click to expand...
£12.9m Loan fee, and sell him next year for our evaluation if he does well at Bayern.

https://x.com/cfcpys/status/1961563496933388364?s=46&t=4B62fAfz0Lmzdlr54vOunQ

Also lets not rewrite history here, JAckson himself asked to move, we did not ask him. We are more than happy to keep. There is competition yes, but we are not pushing him away.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's not how it works. Don't gaslight yourself into accepting it.
Click to expand...
200.gif


 
Our current transfer model will inevitably mean we will find ourselves having to sell a Palmer, Estevao or Caicedo at some point if results dip below CL qualification. Whether we want to or not.

When we sail so close to the wind we will eventually get caught out
Click to expand...
Pretty much. This is also why I said we were very close to this blowing up in our faces. Without Champions League qualification and CWC money, we would be buggered.

I will also keep banging on about this one too, where the f**k is the shirt sponsor? There is no excuse for this anymore. We've probably left around £100m on the table in the last 3 seasons because of these clowns.

 
Really strange example to use when all summer our allegedly Phenomenal Directors are desparately trying to move on Jackson to enable other purchases but cannot due to their own over inflated valuation of an average player and a completely stupid 9 year contract.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget it was our phenomenal directors that built that dog sh*t attack from scratch!

 
…I’m sure you understand that what you have posted here is an utter sh*tshow. Thats not how transfers work and you know it well.

Nick Woltemade transfermarkt value is €30m and he was sold for €90m just now.

Wobble your head and jog on.
Click to expand...
Yes ! At last ! You got something right, it absolutely is an " utter sh*t show" !

 
After the last couple of incoming players, Buonanotte and Enciso, who’s had a second medical after failing Strasbourg’s one, I simply think that these venture capitalists are money laundering using Chelsea. Their signings and their model overall, just doesn’t make sense from the footballing side of things.

 
The attack was not good enough, I firmly believe we have elevated our attack this year. We only had Jackson as a striker FFS and injured Marc Guiu!
Click to expand...
How come our ", brilliant" model left us with just Jacko as a striker ?

 
That's gotta be an AI generated answer .
Click to expand...
Hey Friend "Just to clarify, I'm a real person—not an AI or a bot. You're communicating with an actual human being."

 
Hey Friend "Just to clarify, I'm a real person—not an AI or a bot. You're communicating with an actual human being."
Click to expand...
Hi mate. I thought I was replying to Clownlake, and I've checked and to me, it looks like I did. But I may well be wrong , apologies if I cocked it up somehow. I saw you score at Wolves !!

.....Unless you're Clownlake in disguise??!!

 
  • Haha
Reactions: OTL
Thought i'd do a quick round up of their actual signings so we can keep track of what they've managed without the reliance on the academy to balance the books (apologies for the laughably long list:

Player: Bought for: Sold for: Profit/loss: Current transfermarkt value: Potential profit/loss on value:

Enzo Fernandez 121M - - 75M (46M)

Wesley Fofana 80.4M - - 25M (55.4)

Mudryk 70M banned - 0M (70M)

Cucurella 65.3M - - 35M (30.3M)

Sterling 56.2M - - 10M (46.2M)

Koulibaly 41.9M 23M (18.9M) - -

Badiashile 38M - - 22M (16M)

Madueke 35M 56M 21M - -

Malo Gusto 30M - - 35M 5M

Chukwuemeka 18M 20M 2M - -

Casadei 14.86M 13M (1.86M) - -

A.Santos 12.5M - - 35M 22.5M

Aubameyang 12M Free (12M) - -

D.D.Fofana 12M - - 6M (6M)

Slonina 9.09M - - 3.5M (5.59M)

Zakaria 3M Free (3M) - -

Caicedo 116M - - 90M (26M)

Lavia 62.1M - - 40M (22.1M)

Nkunku 60M 35M? (25M) - -

Cole Palmer 47M - - 120M 73M

Disasi 45M - - 22M (23M)

Jackson 37M - - 50M 13M

Ugochukwu 27M 28.7M 1.7M - -

Sanchez 23M - - 20M (3M)

Petrovic 16M 28.9M 12.9M - -

Deivid Washington 16M - - 8M (8M)

Angelo 15M 23M 8M - -

Pedro Neto 60M - - 50M (10M)

Joao Felix 52M+11M loan 30M (33M) - -

KDH 35.4M 28.65M (6.75M) - -

Jorgensen 24.5M - - 18M (6.5M)

Omari Kellyman 22.5M - - 1.5M (21M)

Mike Penders 20M - - 12M (8M)

Anselmino 16.5M - - 8M (8.5)

Amougou 15M 14.5M (0.5M) - -

Renato Veiga 14M 24.5M 10.5M - -

Caleb Wiley 10.1M - - 8M (2.1M)

Marc Guiu 6M - - 8M 2M

Jadon Sancho 5.9M+5Mcancel FREE (10.9M) - -

Joao Pedro 63.7M - - 50M (13.7M)

Jamie Gittens 56M - - 50M (6M)

Jorrel Hato 44.18M - - 35M (9.18M)

Liam Delap 35.5M - - 40M 4.5M

Estevao 34M - - 60M 26M

Essugo 22.27M - - 20M (2.27M)

Mamadou Sarr 14M - - 20M 6M

Kendry Paez 10M - - 10M 0M

Quenda 50.78M - - 45M (5.78M)

Denner 10M - - N/A N/A

TOTAL 1,700.59M 325.25M (55.81M) 1,032M (280.02M)

To summarise, on the players these directors have bought, they have managed to make a 55.81M loss on these players. On the players they have stockpiled, if they were to be sold for their current market value, we would make a further 280.02M loss. A record sale transfer window is to be expected when you hoard so much talent, its not so impressive when you look at the details of their details. Without the sale of academy stars and Roman era players, the club would have nothing to fall back on.

For reference, we have sold 302.02M worth of players (pure profit) from Cobham since the takeover. Almost as much as we have sold their actual failed signings for. The rest of the sales of 252.96M were from Roman's CL winning team. Cobham's talent is drying up and the CL squad is gone.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c70575zx8l5o

We have also spent by far the most on agent fees for consecutive years, and failed with the most basic commercial deals such as a FOS sponsor since the take over.

Impressive business model!
Click to expand...
Yet last year I guess we cover that £55m loss due to World Cup Championship and the Lower European Cup Win.

The question is can we keep the high income streams flowing during this period of ownership, I would say long term no and that is probably when they cash out.

 
Yet last year I guess we cover that £55m loss due to World Cup Championship and the Lower European Cup Win.

The question is can we keep the high income streams flowing during this period of ownership, I would say long term no and that is probably when they cash out.
Click to expand...
CWC is once every 4 years isn't it?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top