the special one
First Team Regular
- Messages
- 4,567
- Reaction score
- 1,013
Difference between Barkley and RLC imho is that every now and then Barkley can score a worldie, something I'm yet to see from RLC.
I don't know. Over the course of 38 games, Barkley has only a handful of those moments whilst RLC is still a developing 21yr old.Difference between Barkley and RLC imho is that every now and then Barkley can score a worldie, something I'm yet to see from RLC.
Ideally I'd rather we took a punt on RLC too, but I just don't think he has Barkley's end product. I'd like to see Barkley in a similar role to Bakayoko's v United, i.e. I'd like to think Barkley would have put away the chance Bakayoko spooned over the bar. I'm no fan of Barkley but I think 3-5-1-1 could bring out the best in him.I don't know. Over the course of 38 games, Barkley has only a handful of those moments whilst RLC is still a developing 21yr old.
If it was me, I'd rather take a punt on the younger wild card. Barkley for me lacks in footballing IQ.
I'd agree that he would have probably finished the chances but would he put in the same type of performances as Bakayoko to get into those positions?Ideally I'd rather we took a punt on RLC too, but I just don't think he has Barkley's end product. I'd like to see Barkley in a similar role to Bakayoko's v United, i.e. I'd like to think Barkley would have put away the chance Bakayoko spooned over the bar. I'm no fan of Barkley but I think 3-5-1-1 could bring out the best in him.
I personally think a deal was done with Everton which gave us the opportunity to talk to Barkley. We assessed Barkley's condition, realised he wouldn't be back playing much football until January and decided to hold off until the window was open again. I expect us to go back in for him in January with a smaller offer.I'd like to get to the bottom of the deadline day fiasco though...
I think they are at the point now where they will have no choice but to sell him cheap. His contract is up at the end of the season.Cue the "Chelsea snubbed for SPurs" rhetoric if he (hopefully) goes to the bottlers.
I hope to Jeebus we stay away he's just not that good a player and Everton are carpet merchants when it comes to selling their players.
They can't afford to - they have to stave off relegation after all.I think they are at the point now where they will have no choice but to sell him cheap. His contract is up at the end of the season.
Totally agree. Has never lived up to the hype and is not a reliable player discipline-wise. Poor positionally, and also loses it in big games. Has similar workrate issues to RLC, but just can't see that he has any more to offer than RLC.Not convinced by him really, injury prone and never consistently performed. Why not just get RLC back next season, probably getting a similar caliber of player and save 30M plus the 100k a week. By investing so much in youth, we can't just buy a 30M squad player every time there's a gap to fill, either spend 60M for a top player or promote from within
And yet back in September, the BBC carried this report which said there was no medical:Barkley had a medical at Chelsea in the summer but pulled out of a move
Midfielder Ross Barkley has denied Everton's claim that he turned down a transfer deadline-day move to Chelsea after having a medical.
Majority shareholder Farhad Moshiri said Everton had accepted a bid and Barkley had agreed terms.
But the 23-year-old tweeted on Saturday that he had not had a medical "with any club at any point".
"I decided it would be best to make a decision and assess all my options in January when fully fit," he said.