In my opinion, he would be a lot less of a gamble than the likes of Van der Vaart and Modric that a lot of people are advocating. These guys have never even played in a decent league, so when people say that Ron "could" turn out like Shevchenko, there is every chance that these other guys "could" turn out like Kezman.As they say, form is temporary but class is permanent. It was only 1 year ago that he was the undisputed best player in the world.
Something dodgy has been going on within the Barca squad over the last 18 months or so. It has effected Ron's game (along with Eto, and Riikaards management, so it seems). A change of scenery might be just what he needs to get back to the form he was in when we played against him in the Champion's League - and he made our watertight defence look pretty shaky on occaisions.
Comparing him to Sheva isn't really doing him justice. Sheva's game was all about pace, so signing him as a 30 year old when he had lost his main asset was in hindsight not a great move.
Ron's game is not really about pace - it is about pure skill, technique and inspiration. One look at Zola will tell you that these qualities get potentially get better, even into a players mid 30's.
He would fit perfectly into our system at the moment playing as a wide forward, and he would also be an option playing through the middle if we go down the path of playing with an attacking central midfielder.
And if we could get him for 12 mil - that is a gamble well worth taking. What's the worst that could happen?