I'd argue that despite our spending a lot of our best players are still from the academy - e.g. James, Colwill, Acheampong. Says it all about Clearlake really.Do we really have great players though? Palmer & Caicedo yea, then Colwill, you could maybe say Estevao but he’s way too raw atm.
No matter who comes in, the recruitment has been poor, and it will come all the way back to the sporting directors yet again.
No we have good players. IF we had a proper experienced manager (with a vision and an ability to adapt tactically) that manager wouldn't be complaining about the quality of our youngsters. Our players are good. They are not being utilised properly. The shape of our team never changes and Maresca is out of ideas.Do we really have great players though? Palmer & Caicedo yea, then Colwill, you could maybe say Estevao but he’s way too raw atm.
No matter who comes in, the recruitment has been poor, and it will come all the way back to the sporting directors yet again.
I disagree. We have players who have won world cups, players who start for Ancelotti's Brazil, etc. These are young players - not mid-table players. They don't have experience and so they look to the manager - but alas our manager has no experience either and our manager doesn't have that many ideas either.Not sure i agree. Of the 16 players who festered today i would say Caciedo and James are the only top drawer players. Esteviao is still very young and you feel he will become quality, same with Acheampong.
The other 12? Largely mid table players with the occasional good game in their locker.
Thing is our world cup winner is probably up there with Roque Junior and Kleberson as one of the worst players to ever win it.I disagree. We have players who have won world cups, players who start for Ancelotti's Brazil, etc. These are young players - not mid-table players. They don't have experience and so they look to the manager - but alas our manager has no experience either and our manager doesn't have that many ideas either.
I confess i actually like Enzo Fernandez as a player. He's not really suited to our formation and the way we currently play. But Little Enzo is a footballer. Good control and distribution imho.Thing is our world cup winner is probably up there with Roque Junior and Kleberson as one of the worst players to ever win it.
Not in the Premier League. His control and distribution is often sh*t because he can't cope with the constant intensity of the league. In a hotter climate, he's fine, because teams can't play at this intensity for the whole game. I'm confident that Enzo will never be a top player in this league and will always have games like today where he can't contribute a single positive thing.I confess i actually like Enzo Fernandez as a player. He's not really suited to our formation and the way we currently play. But Little Enzo is a footballer. Good control and distribution imho.
Do we really have great players though? Palmer & Caicedo yea, then Colwill, you could maybe say Estevao but he’s way too raw atm.
No matter who comes in, the recruitment has been poor, and it will come all the way back to the sporting directors yet again.
I confess i actually like Enzo Fernandez as a player. He's not really suited to our formation and the way we currently play. But Little Enzo is a footballer. Good control and distribution imho.
Do we have 2 players called Enzo, because the one your talking about definitely isn't Enzo Fernandez.I confess i actually like Enzo Fernandez as a player. He's not really suited to our formation and the way we currently play. But Little Enzo is a footballer. Good control and distribution imho.
Wrong formation - we played more of a 4-3-3 against A**x and we should have stuck with that today. We didn't need Enzo Fernandez today - Fernandez is a technical player better suited to European games and the "bigger clubs". He is also a leader on the pitch - he is our vice captain for a reason.What a clown this manger is - it was obvious Pedro and Pedro were both having a bad day - so what's Maresca do ?
Takes off our goalscorer Garnacho and then Guiu - who'd had practically zero service all game!
When is this idiot going to stop playing his favorites and start picking a winning line up ?
And Enzo... I dunno... first name on the team sheet - why - what is it he does ?
Another 3 points down the drain for me because of Maresca.
Credit to Sunderland - came with a game plan and executed it to perfection.
What did Chelsea do - put on a team that shouldn't have lost ffs...
it is offside.Is this not offside? Unlike the free kick that was given offside by the pathetic ref
View attachment 36305
I have heard this 'leader on the pitch' thing one or two times before but I have never seen it. I don't remotely see him as being a leader in the pitch. Quite the opposite. Largely invisible as the game passes him by. Is he a player you'd want by your side when the chips are down and you need dragged up to standard? Not a chance for me. Isn't remotely fit to be picked let alone wear the armband.Wrong formation - we played more of a 4-3-3 against A**x and we should have stuck with that today. We didn't need Enzo Fernandez today - Fernandez is a technical player better suited to European games and the "bigger clubs". He is also a leader on the pitch - he is our vice captain for a reason.
I like Marc Guiu good lad - but he was awful today - he only touched the ball 6 maybe 7 times - not good enough. So he goes off and you push J.Pedro further up which is fine. But then before that idea even has a chance to do anything Maresca takes off J.Pedro puts on George as no.9 - i mean wtf. What was - what is - Maresca thinking?