What's new

Harry Kane.

I think just as much as we need Kane to improve we need to buy him just to stop our rivals from improving even more.  I think we've closed the gap slightly this year, but if Utd or City get Kane we're back to square one.

Also Skys constant bias to Utd is annoying why are they always mentioned first as serious contenders even though they couldn't afford Sancho last year? 

 Manchester United, Manchester City and Chelsea have all been in touch with Kane's representatives

 
Yes that bias is really starting to make my piss itch, I mentioned Roman has 2.5 times the wealth of those sh*testers Utd, yet still they bark their f**kin tune…

 
Timo and Kane has all the potential to be just as good as Kane & Son, so that would be really interesting to see. 

We should definitely go for it, but just can't get caught in the midst of a transfer saga that ruins our entire summer by delaying other potential targets.

I just can't see Levy dealing him to us, even if we're the last one in Earth with money + Kane probably wouldn't want to ruin his good national boy image by joining his rivals, would he?

 
DarkMata said:
I think just as much as we need Kane to improve we need to buy him just to stop our rivals from improving even more.  I think we've closed the gap slightly this year, but if Utd or City get Kane we're back to square one.

Also Skys constant bias to Utd is annoying why are they always mentioned first as serious contenders even though they couldn't afford Sancho last year? 

 Manchester United, Manchester City and Chelsea have all been in touch with Kane's representatives
Click to expand...
Do you really think we have closed the gap? I think we are as far off as we were last season. We have conceded far less than last season, but we have also scored 14 goals fewer. We got to the final of the FA Cup last year and lost it, same again this season. The Champions League has been an improvement, but our fixtures have been a lot kinder compared to last season.

This group suffers the same mental weaknesses as last season. They are capable of turning up and putting in big performances, but too often they take their eye off the game, drop points at crucial moments and can't seem to get over the line in the biggest moments.

 
Scott Harris said:
Do you really think we have closed the gap? I think we are as far off as we were last season. We have conceded far less than last season, but we have also scored 14 goals fewer. We got to the final of the FA Cup last year and lost it, same again this season. The Champions League has been an improvement, but our fixtures have been a lot kinder compared to last season.

This group suffers the same mental weaknesses as last season. They are capable of turning up and putting in big performances, but too often they take their eye off the game, drop points at crucial moments and can't seem to get over the line in the biggest moments.
Click to expand...
I would yes but not by a lot.  I think there was a stat that said only City have got more points since Tuchel arrived so I think he has helped.  Mason has defiantly stepped up another level or 2 this season and I'm hoping some of the other players step up next year given that its the debut season for some including Tuchel.   But you're right the goals are not good enough, its the area we need to add to next season if we are to close the gap further, hence why Kane would be perfect for us.

 
You lot aren’t considering the hidden costs here. We’d have to revamp the drainage at The Bridge to deal with all that extra dribble if we sign ol’ Spitty.

 
Gol15 said:
If that's the case we go all in for Haaland and we're the winners on the long term.
Click to expand...
Was about to include that in my post, but seeing Dortmund have made it to CL for the next season, I think he will stay there and Raiola will wait for that release clause to kick in next summer and basically start an auction for Haaland and redirect him to the club that pays Raiola the biggest agent fee. Of course he can do it this summer, too, but he will only have a few clubs to choose from, as opposed to the next summer when every single big club will surely trigger that release clause, hence more options for a fat pay.

But of course I would not mind if we somehow get him this summer, he is a true generational talent.

 
Would definitely buy him if the price is reasonable, no way we'd pay 150M for a 28 years old with a long injury history. I reckon all his suitors will be priced out, and that's on him, WTF sign a 6 years contract when you knew you club wont win anything, anytime soon

 
There's more chance of Levy selling us their 'glory glory' branded empty trophy cabinet than Kane.

Kane will go to Man City and Danny Ings will go to Spurs as his replacement.

 
Don't see this happening. As far as Levy is concerned, selling Kane to Chelsea would be as bad as him burning down their stadium to Spurs Fans.

Save the cash and go for Haaland.

 
Many - myself included - would have to overcome a looooot of aversion if we sign him 🤮

 
I'd love to sign Kane. He's a great centre forward and it would really piss off Spurs fans.

 
Having Kane here is already 25 goals more in a season.

Unfortunately, this won't happen. 

 
I just have this feeling that when we buy Kane, he'll lose his goals and some no-namer like Matej Vydra suddenly explodes and goes on a freak purple patch for 2 years

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top