Kanté was not one of Leicester's main players going forwards, and this is speaking as someone who attended every Leicester home game last season. Both he and Drinkwater were holding midfielders; just because Kanté covered a lot of ground doesn't mean he was some sort of Robson-esque box-to-box midfielder. He was a pure defensive midfielder who covered a lot of ground off the ball in a team which was built around attacking directly into space vacated by the other side while in possession. Drinkwater was (and still is) the main conduit of possession for Leicester; Kanté's job was merely to stop other teams getting the ball and to stop them doing anything useful with it when they did.
Matic was the defensive midfielder of a two-man partnership in a team which was built to dominate possession. Against big teams away, yes, he basically played a purely holding role, but generally speaking that wasn't the case. No midfielder in a side constructed in the way ours was could play a purely defensive role; they had to have some responsibility in possession, some impetus to provide to the attack. Matic was (and still is) far, far more adventurous in his passing than Kanté has ever been, and while he's not exactly a Frank Lampard, has more attacking instincts.
Leicester's pressing was, for the most part, designed to disrupt the opponent in possession, to lead them towards playing it safe, which would force them to commit more players forward, and in turn vacate more space in their own half into which Leicester could attack. Ours, again for the most part, was designed to win the ball so we can have a spell in possession ourselves, rather than playing it vertically and immediately going for goal. No player in that system, especially a midfielder could have their responsibilities reduced to purely a holding role.
17 hours ago, Rusty-Man said:
There is no such thing as a pure defensive or holding midfielder in a 4-4-2. Both players have to cover too much ground and offer in all phases of the game compared to a three man midfield. Kante was always giving support in attack, drifting out wide to the left and getting forwards. Just watch these 17 minutes and tell me he was a holding midfielder who was unadventurous going forwards:
You can of course point out these posts where people said he was better than busquets. Or was it in reality people highly rating a young player who was fantastic for us at the time, saying he could be better than busquets if he keeps progressing as he is.Remember when people thought he was better than Busquets? Good times.
I could have done, if my sole intention was to mock people. The post was more highlighting just how far he's fallen.You can of course point out these posts where people said he was better than busquets. Or was it in reality people highly rating a young player who was fantastic for us at the time, saying he could be better than busquets if he keeps progressing as he is.
Honestly, these kind of posts are just sh*t.
Calling him a pure defensive midfielder is doing him a disservice. Sure, he was a big part of their defence, harrying and winning balls all over the place but when they attacked he was often bombing forwards with them and helping out in attack. He was everywhere, in attack and defence making both offensive and defensive contributions in all phases of play. That's where the joke about water covering two thirds of the earth and Kante covering the rest comes from. In my opinion, the way he is being played at Chelsea is not utilising his full capabilities. He is currently the holding player in a midfield three more akin to Busquets role at Barca. I would much rather he played in Matic's role at the moment which is more like his role at Leicester.Did you watch Leicester last season?
One of the running jokes among the stewards was "We have Drinkwater in defensive midfeld and Kanté either side".
Next thing I know you'll be claiming he's an asset at set pieces.
If somebody recorded me playing for my amateur team all season and then put all the best bits together, even I'd look a player.
using a YouTube video to defend Matic is baffling, he's awful. I actually lost count of how many passes he misplaced today.
if we play him as a DM he still has a role to play but isn't an instant starter, but if we seem intent on playing him further forward we may as well get shot now because his distribution is terrible.
What's weird about that comment?Seriously weird comment coming out from Matic after the Arsenal game...
"We have to know we play for a big club and we have to recover as soon as possible and be focused on the next game. I'm sure the coach will see where the problem is."
Maybe he likes being at the club a lot, and he's doing his best Mikel impression to stay here as long as Mikel has.he just looks like he doesn't have any energy, he moves so slow and laboured, keeps hold of the ball for too long and seems like he no longer looks to pass forward nowhere near as much as his breakout season here.
At least Mikel can actually play...Maybe he likes being at the club a lot, and he's doing his best Mikel impression to stay here as long as Mikel has.