Haha jokes^ I guess that depends on the price. He wasn't really worse last season than Pogba...![]()
Football is a business, but surely part of that is not strengthening your rivals or increasing the chances of doing that.I'm of the opinion that, if he's useful enough that we should not be happy to take United's money, then we should be keeping him.
I find the idea that we should not sell to them because they (supposedly) would not sell to us a bit childish. Football is business and it's not like there's loads of European clubs fighting to sign him.
You also have to consider the player's wishes. You can't force them to go abroad. And United and Arsenal have hardly been setting the PL alight as a result of us selling to them.Football is a business, but surely part of that is not strengthening your rivals or increasing the chances of doing that.Pretty sure we could have sold the likes of Mata and Cech elsewhere.
You couldn't possibly be talking about the same Ousmane Dembele who's a forward, right? Or is there another player named 'Ousama Dembele' who's a midfielder?£40mil-£50mil would be a good price for Matic and I don't think we will settle for just Bakayoko if that happens. My hope is to have him replaced by Ousama Dembele and have us play 3-5-2 more (Kante-Bakayoko-Dembele).
Pretty much my thinking. More than happy to let him go but not to a rival when they never sell to us.I wouldn't sell to United but not because I rate Matic.
hes not a great footballer but I hate selling to rivals when we don't get the same back.