Raheem Sterling signs for Chelsea

All academic anyway ... it seems the Rosenior "clean slate" does not apply to Raheem ... and it is just Axel "I concede goals for fun in the under-21" Disasi who is going to be re-integrated !

And with that one fell swoop, BlueCo have "fixed" our centre back problem with an internal solution LOL.
If football IS entertainment... Come on his OG against Liecester was brilliant... Its up there with sinclair's and burley's efforts decades ago. Long Live Disasi..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In what way?
Both effectively retired and sat on fat contracts when they could have taken a pay cut and carried on playing. Hazard was on the bench 42 times in his last season at Madrid and only missed 4 games through injury. He could have easily gone back to Lille if he wanted to continue playing.

 
I don't think this scenario is the same or even a correct comparison. We could get rid of Sterling if he wanted to leave but he doesn't want to. As I said in my original post, he has every right to do what he's doing, but it just means that he really has no interest in playing football anymore.
If we really wanted him to leave we could pay off the remainder of his contract.

 
As Ultra Capitalists , BlueCo should know morality doesn't come into it. , if the contract is legal and sound, Sterling is entitled to extract as much money as he can .

That's the philosophy that drives these people, Sterling as well as BlueCo. .
Haven't BlueCo done the same by putting Boehly into their bomb squad. We've not seen hide nor hair of him, yet he's still picking up his dough for doing fck all.

 
But he was a needless signing. A player with his best days behind him and burned out / lacking hunger on ridiculous wages. That's what I mean by worst signing - he might have got a few goals and assists when he first came, but in terms of cost he has been a massive waste of money.

But he does at least have the honour of hitting the worst free-kick I have ever seen in my life!!
I don't think he was burnt out at all. I think he was 28 when he joined wasn't he. The reality is other than a couple of purple patches when the flow of traffic was going in his direction, he's always been a one trick pony and Boehly can't really be blamed for being gaslit on Youtube videos and sh*t punditry.

He was to Boehly what Fernandez is to Egbhali. I remember him being flown out to LA doing the Dodgers photo shoots etc, as the marquee senior signing. The reality is the bloke has always been limited. Shame that those that have followed can't even surpass the meagre return we got from Sterling.

 
Both effectively retired and sat on fat contracts when they could have taken a pay cut and carried on playing. Hazard was on the bench 42 times in his last season at Madrid and only missed 4 games through injury. He could have easily gone back to Lille if he wanted to continue playing.
I'd say it's a little different because of his injuries, but yeah he did check out which is evident considering he retired as soon as Madrid let him go.

If we really wanted him to leave we could pay off the remainder of his contract.
Which is probably what we'll end up doing, but if that happens I wouldn't touch him if I were any other club even on a free.

 
I'd say it's a little different because of his injuries, but yeah he did check out which is evident considering he retired as soon as Madrid let him go.

Which is probably what we'll end up doing, but if that happens I wouldn't touch him if I were any other club even on a free.
Hazard got injured, Sterling regressed after playing so much football so young. Both players bodies gave up on them and they weren't the player the club thought they were getting and both sat on fat contracts until they retired.

We can't praise Hazard and lambast Sterling for the same. Our anger should be at the owners for handling it all so poorly, Raheem is doing nothing that we all wouldn't do in his position.

 
Hazard got injured, Sterling regressed after playing so much football so young. Both players bodies gave up on them and they weren't the player the club thought they were getting and both sat on fat contracts until they retired.

We can't praise Hazard and lambast Sterling for the same. Our anger should be at the owners for handling it all so poorly, Raheem is doing nothing that we all wouldn't do in his position.
I didn't praise Hazard, I said he checked out, but I think it was different because he had a bad injury and as far as we know Sterling is fit and healthy. Sterling also had a chance last season to play football in London at a title contender while receiving his contracted wage which is allegedly his perfect scenario, and he barely got off the bench.

You can say Boehly was idiotic for giving him his contract while acknowledging Sterling has no real interest being a professional footballer anymore, I don't think it's a one or the other.

 
The Hazard transfer was very painful for Real Madrid/Perez, which is another feather to Eden's bow LOL !

£103.5m fee

£500K a week for 4 years (another £100m odd)

About £30m per Eden goal basically !

 
The Hazard transfer was very painful for Real Madrid/Perez, which is another feather to Eden's bow LOL !

£103.5m fee

£500K a week for 4 years (another £100m odd)

About £30m per Eden goal basically !
If he hadnt left he wouldn't have been injured. that's how I see it.

 
A unique talent for whom training and fitness wasn't a big priority. It had to catch up with him eventually.
It was inevitable he'd go to Madrid... too talented to pass it up. I honestly think the club doctors had him sussed and kept him playing for us. you're probably right though, we got a good deal and he realised his ambition to play for ZZ top at Madrid.

 
The Hazard transfer was very painful for Real Madrid/Perez, which is another feather to Eden's bow LOL !

£103.5m fee

£500K a week for 4 years (another £100m odd)

About £30m per Eden goal basically !
That was the reported fee without bonuses. My favourite part was where they won the CL in 2022 and we got a hefty chunk of bonus cash.

 
Hypocritical then. Both effectively ended their careers early to see out their big salaries when they could have moved.
Hazard wasn't playing for us at that time. I don't care what happens at other clubs.

 
A unique talent for whom training and fitness wasn't a big priority. It had to catch up with him eventually.
Plus he started his career when he was 17. What happen to hazard and sterling are very typical wonderkids who start their career very young. By the time they hit 30 or even younger they are done.

Same thing happen to cesc, I remember hi last season with us, he was done,it was like he was running in slow motion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top