I'd take both of those tbf as experienced options. Icardi is a bit of a nob but knows how to score and Peredes good experience for the middle of the park and can help Enzo/Pochettino.
Icardi is a total knob. But we could spend 100 million quid on a player and end up with a nob as well. Yes, I am looking at you, Lukaku.
Sounds unlikely. We balked at Ugarte’s wages. We’re in a stalemate over Mount’s contract. And we’re suddenly now going to throw money at Neymar?
More journo B.S. if there isn't enough already. We need to introduce a minimum IQ before allowing an internet connection. All present company excepted.
Eeek. No. Not our best idea. IF true.
We started the transfer window with the difficult task of off loading around 15 players we don't need and buying a striker, defensive mid, and a new goalkeeper. What we're actually doing is getting rid of players we didn't really want to lose and now having the more difficult task of replacing them, and still needing to off load around 15 players we don't need and buying a striker, defensive mid, and a new goalkeeper.
Don't forget the Vision List. We are still working on the Vision List. Acquiring the best teenager players from all over the world.
I remember this guy from Vision On.
Is he a teenager? Is he?
It's not the lack of progress or signings its the fact we could lose Jorginho, Kovacic, Kante, Mount, and Havertz in 6 months. Thats essentially the core of the Chelsea team ripped apart. Even if we do replace these players with top quality replacements isn't Pochettino going to be in the same position as Potter with a load of players that have only just met? It can't be a good idea going in to the new season with only Thiago, Chilwell, James, and Kepa who have know each other for more than a season. That plus there's a big possibility we could lose all these useful players and be stuck with Pulisic and Zyiech.
