Bob stark
First Team Regular
- Messages
- 7,620
- Reaction score
- 3,448
Not really. You can see Disasi doing well for Mourinho, Nuno , Dyche or Moyes team.If that's the case, he should go and play in the NBA, not football.
Not really. You can see Disasi doing well for Mourinho, Nuno , Dyche or Moyes team.If that's the case, he should go and play in the NBA, not football.
So let me get this straight, in your own words, Disasi who you can see doing well for relegation-style football for managers who have almost relegated their clubs should be playing ahead of Trevoh if the only quality we want is defending the box?Not really. You can see Disasi doing well for Mourinho, Nuno , Dyche or Moyes team.
Unfortunately, Disasi's weaknesses (and complete f**k ups) far outweigh any strengths.Not really, the main criticism on Chalobah is his aerial and box defending. These are Disasi strengths.
It's not. You just need to have all the CBs and GKs speak the same language, able to voice concerns on the spot and be good at football.I actually think getting CBs pairings that work well is a bit of an art.
Also they need a good relationship with the keeper as trust needs to be established.
When we had Terry and Cech it all looked so easy I think those times were an exception rather than the rule.
Language and I guess communication is key, what could go wrong different languages and then there is strong accents?It's not. You just need to have all the CBs and GKs speak the same language, able to voice concerns on the spot and be good at football.
Terry works well with anyone because he's outspoken, bold and is actually good at football.
Thiago Silva is a bit of an exception but only because he has mastered the art of being a CB
In terms of Terry,Language and I guess communication is key, what could go wrong different languages and then there is strong accents?
With Terry I guess there were non-verbal cues too.
I get what you are saying but Gary Cahill average????In terms of Terry,
When both players are really good at defending but may have language issues, you get Terry-Carvalho
When one is really good whilst the other lesser but communication is good, you get Terry-Gallas.
When one is really good whilst the other average but both speak the same language, you get Terry-Cahill
IMO, You only really need 1 really good CB, you just need the other one to be good enough and can communicate well. What you really don't want but looks good on paper and in conversations are CBs that "cover the weaknesses of the partner"
This. Now what do you want your cb to do?Unfortunately, Disasi's weaknesses (and complete f**k ups) far outweigh any strengths.
Cahill was an odd one, sometimes costing us a goal yet often scoring too in the same match from set pieces.I get what you are saying but Gary Cahill average????
Crazy really that Cahill would be our current best CB by an absolute country mile.Cahill was an odd one, sometimes costing us a goal yet often scoring too in the same match from set pieces.
Decent rather than great yet his desire to get a goal back was impressive.
Cahill was an average CB, he was just decent to good at best, his best quality was goal scoring.I get what you are saying but Gary Cahill average????
I thought you said you don't like Disasi. Cahill case is quite similar to Disasi, very good box defender, not so great at defending open space.Cahill was an average CB, he was just decent to good at best, his best quality was goal scoring.
In saying that, if we signed him today, he's easily our first choice without any argument
You cannot be serious. They share some characteristics but they're miles apart, they don't even belong in the same league. Cahill was consistent, adaptable, can score goals and technically sound.I thought you said you don't like Disasi. Cahill case is quite similar to Disasi, very good box defender, not so great at defending open space.
Not really. Cahill biggest weaknes was defending open space. Not a big problem when you are playing for Mou or Conte.You cannot be serious. They share some characteristics but they're miles apart, they don't even belong in the same league. Cahill was consistent, adaptable, can score goals and technically sound.
Cahill also cost like 7M, Disasi was 30+M iirc.
Wrong. Cahill's just a better player, you can't just assume player A works in B system but can't work in C system.Not really. Cahill biggest weaknes was defending open space. Not a big problem when you are playing for Mou or Conte.
If you ask him to defend the way Rosenior/Maresca want to defend, he will suffer the same fate as Disasi.