I do think he has talent but I wouldn't sign him. I feel like the guy has lost interest in football a la Sterling. He's always been a fair weather player only playing well when it suits him. If we are to buy more experienced players we need players who our young lads can look up to not someone who will hide when the going gets tough.Should we sign Rashford?
He is 29 on crazy salary, nobody will sign him.
No, because the negatives he brings outweigh any negligeable positives.Should we sign Rashford?
He is 29 on crazy salary, nobody will sign him.
Are you sure? The guy had 8 goals and 7 assists in a Barca side where Raphinha was out injured for 4 months, and stilled ended the season with 13 goals and 3 assists playing the same role.Rashford has apparently played 492 senior career games, which is close enough to the fabled 500-game wall to put me off.
He's an exceptional footballer though.
15 goal contributions in 19 games' worth of minutes (plus a further 8 in the Champions' League) is pretty good, yes.Are you sure? The guy had 8 goals and 7 assists in a Barca side where Raphinha was out injured for 4 months, and stilled ended the season with 13 goals and 3 assists playing the same role.
He is on £325k/w, wouldn’t touch him even as a free transfer.
His output dwarfs Julian Alvarez whom everyone seems convinced is a £100m player, lolAre you sure? The guy had 8 goals and 7 assists in a Barca side where Raphinha was out injured for 4 months, and stilled ended the season with 13 goals and 3 assists playing the same role.
He is on £325k/w, wouldn’t touch him even as a free transfer.
If Rashford is not on crazy salary, you will have a lot of team queuing for him. All of this "attitude/toxic" issue is really more for fans. In reality most of the time player get along just fine.No, because the negatives he brings outweigh any negligeable positives.
No team will sign Rashford as he is 29 on crazy salary, it is as simple as that.I do think he has talent but I wouldn't sign him. I feel like the guy has lost interest in football a la Sterling. He's always been a fair weather player only playing well when it suits him. If we are to buy more experienced players we need players who our young lads can look up to not someone who will hide when the going gets tough.
Except thats the entire reason Utd got rid of him in the first place, nothing to do with the fans.. All of this "attitude/toxic" issue is really more for fans. In reality most of the time player get along just fine.
United is trying to reduce their salary.Except thats the entire reason Utd got rid of him in the first place, nothing to do with the fans.
I actually see Rogers as the perfect player for Alonso's main formation. If he goes three at the back with pacy wingbacks like Quenda and Gittens (i just have a feeling that he might try to create a Frimpong out of Gittens). Caicedo and the CM midfielder he wants, then both Palmer and Rogers could reside in their respective half spaces with JP up top. It has got pace and overloads throughout with genuine quality. Will they do it. Will they fck. Can they afford it, can they fck.Maybe, but isn't Rogers also similar to Palmer? How would that work? I think when you look at the depth of say Man City you could say it does work.
Get the best players you can get. I have no idea about the specificity - it is only a rumour at this point.
This is my concern, if we adopt a sell to buy policy then we could miss out on any targets we realistically could have attracted.For a sell to buy club let's wait and see if they are capable of selling anyone in this window first to fund all of these grand plans and PR briefings
My bigger concern atm is that all i hear is content creators and tv pundits talking about who is going to be leaving as well as PR briefings by the Twattarati with some ridiculous numbers.This is my concern, if we adopt a sell to buy policy then we could miss out on any targets we realistically could have attracted.
Convincing players to come to a club without any European football is one thing but convincing them to wait until we sell a player to get the funds is something else.
Unless we buy first and sell later I’m struggling to see how we can attract any top players this summer.
Vuskovic is a prime example. Croatia’s starting CB at just 19, bought by Spurs last season for £10m, loaned to Hamburg. De Zerbi is trying to buy Van Hecke from Brighton, who have smartly bid £30m for Vuskovic as a direct replacement, which is well under his £50m market value.This is my concern, if we adopt a sell to buy policy then we could miss out on any targets we realistically could have attracted.
Convincing players to come to a club without any European football is one thing but convincing them to wait until we sell a player to get the funds is something else.
Unless we buy first and sell later I’m struggling to see how we can attract any top players this summer.
Not sure he solves any problems for us, but our owners will still try. They tried signing him last January, he said No. Don’t think we are an attractive destination this summer.Bouaddi looks a great midfielder. Imagine him next to Caicedo. Looks Arsenal bound
Interesting shout about Gittens, the little I've seen him I've thought he might make a decent, attcking wingback. Generally seems to be a consencus out there that he can't though, so who knows.I actually see Rogers as the perfect player for Alonso's main formation. If he goes three at the back with pacy wingbacks like Quenda and Gittens (i just have a feeling that he might try to create a Frimpong out of Gittens). Caicedo and the CM midfielder he wants, then both Palmer and Rogers could reside in their respective half spaces with JP up top. It has got pace and overloads throughout with genuine quality. Will they do it. Will they fck. Can they afford it, can they fck.
For a sell to buy club let's wait and see if they are capable of selling anyone in this window first to fund all of these grand plans and PR briefings