Riyad Mahrez

Best player on the pitch yesterday. I have made jokes for sure but it’s clear now he would be an upgrade on willian/Pedro and he would certainly help our attack. Won’t happen, but I really do like the player 

 
Best player on the pitch yesterday. I have made jokes for sure but it’s clear now he would be an upgrade on willian/Pedro and he would certainly help our attack. Won’t happen, but I really do like the player 
i really feel frustrated but i really really wish that we sign Sandro and Mehrez this January please

 
Best player on the pitch yesterday. I have made jokes for sure but it’s clear now he would be an upgrade on willian/Pedro and he would certainly help our attack. Won’t happen, but I really do like the player 
To be fair ambrosetti and gronkjaer would be upgrades on them right now too so...

But yeah hazard, mahrez and Barkley off a good striker would be much better viewing.

 
Who would be a better signing. Mahrez or Sanchez. Its a hard one, i prefer Mahrez as a player, but Sanchez is more the sort of player we need right now.

 
Sanchez is the better player imo. Age, wage and character wise, mahrez is more sensible. That said, I’d be absolutely delighted with either but doubt we’re even in for them.

 
An agreement that we won't stand in his way has been in place for two years, but that doesn't mean we have to accept any offer. It has to be a substantial amount of money and inline with the current market. If someone wants to pony up £75m then the club will let him go.
Puel thinks Mahrez will be worth 100m in the summer.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11712/11209052/leicesters-riyad-mahrez-could-cost-100m-in-the-summer-says-claude-puel

Pesonally, I'd rather pay 30m for Sanchez than even 75m for Mahrez. Sanchez is the better player overall, Mahrez is inconsistent, he blows hot and cold. Yes, Sanchez'll probaly demand much higher wages, but if you add transfer fees plus wages plus agent fees you'll probably look at comparable amounts over the course of their contracts. The only edge Riyad has over Alexis is his age.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Puel thinks Mahrez will be worth 100m in the summer.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11712/11209052/leicesters-riyad-mahrez-could-cost-100m-in-the-summer-says-claude-puel

Pesonally, I'd rather pay 30m for Sanchez than even 75m for Mahrez. Sanchez is the better player overall, Mahrez is inconsistent, he blows hot and cold. Yes, Sanchez'll probaly demand much higher wages, but if you add transfer fees plus wages plus agent fees you'll probably look at comparable amounts over the course of their contracts. The only edge Riyad has over Alexis is his age.
It was a bit tongue in cheek and more a comment on how quickly the market moves forward, whilst also setting the stall out for people to stop expecting us to accept a sh*tting offer just because Mahrez fancies a shot at playing somewhere else. Roma bid £17m in the summer FFS :laugh2:

Mahrez isn't actually as inconsistent as people think, you need to watch us week in week out to understand our and his issues. As a team our form has been so up and down the last few years, Mahrez gets affected by that. When the other 10 are off their game or not confident, the only chance Mahrez gets to do anything is on the half way line, with no support and surrounded by 5 players... he's good, but expecting him to produce from those positions all the time is ridiculous. His skills and ability always shine through, even if as a team we aren't putting him in the positions and situations he needs to be able to imapct the game. People see that as a Mahrez issue rather than a Leicester issue, which it actually is.

Somewhat like people doubting Hazard because your whole team was poor on Saturday and struggles to create situations for him to perform.

 
It was a bit tongue in cheek and more a comment on how quickly the market moves forward, whilst also setting the stall out for people to stop expecting us to accept a sh*tting offer just because Mahrez fancies a shot at playing somewhere else. Roma bid £17m in the summer FFS :laugh2:

Mahrez isn't actually as inconsistent as people think, you need to watch us week in week out to understand our and his issues. As a team our form has been so up and down the last few years, Mahrez gets affected by that. When the other 10 are off their game or not confident, the only chance Mahrez gets to do anything is on the half way line, with no support and surrounded by 5 players... he's good, but expecting him to produce from those positions all the time is ridiculous. His skills and ability always shine through, even if as a team we aren't putting him in the positions and situations he needs to be able to imapct the game. People see that as a Mahrez issue rather than a Leicester issue, which it actually is.

Somewhat like people doubting Hazard because your whole team was poor on Saturday and struggles to create situations for him to perform.
Almost exactly what I was about to post. Mahrez looks great for Leicester because he's given the time and space by opposing teams to play his game. We don't get any space for our forwards as teams set up to squeeze us out the game and hit us on the counter. If players like Hazard, Pedro & Willian are being marked out of the game while playing for us, what the hell is Mahrez going to do for us!?

 
Almost exactly what I was about to post. Mahrez looks great for Leicester because he's given the time and space by opposing teams to play his game. We don't get any space for our forwards as teams set up to squeeze us out the game and hit us on the counter. If players like Hazard, Pedro & Willian are being marked out of the game while playing for us, what the hell is Mahrez going to do for us!?
I think you've misunderstood. The point was the inconsistency people think he has, is a Leicester issue not getting him into good positions, rather than a Mahrez issue. The better the team he moves to, the better he'll look as his team mates with be a) better at finding him in the right areas b) actually give him support, rather than Danny Simpson standing 50m away as his only option and c) you have other threats that draw players away, where as here he's pretty much our only creative threat and the opposition try and crowd him out.

Mahrez can put people on their arse with the flick of his boot, he's got no problem in tight situations with a lot of players. He's saved us game after game where teams came to frustrate us.

 
I think you've misunderstood. The point was the inconsistency people think he has, is a Leicester issue not getting him into good positions, rather than a Mahrez issue. The better the team he moves to, the better he'll look as his team mates with be a) better at finding him in the right areas b) actually give him support, rather than Danny Simpson standing 50m away as his only option and c) you have other threats that draw players away, where as here he's pretty much our only creative threat and the opposition try and crowd him out.

Mahrez can put people on their arse with the flick of his boot, he's got no problem in tight situations with a lot of players. He's saved us game after game where teams came to frustrate us.
In that case I apologies as I did misunderstand, I should have read your post more thoroughly. Which also means I wholeheartedly disagree with you. If you was to put Willian or Pedro into the Leicester team, in my opinion they would be far more effective than Mahrez has ever been, for two reasons: Firstly because, as I mentioned above, they would have far more space to work in while being closed down far less than at Chelsea. And secondly, simply they are superior players! 

Mahrez is a player we do not need unless we are going to completely change our formation and style of play. More in the lines of how City and Liverpool play, which unfortunately is not Antonios style, so not likely to happen.

 
In that case I apologies as I did misunderstand, I should have read your post more thoroughly. Which also means I wholeheartedly disagree with you. If you was to put Willian or Pedro into the Leicester team, in my opinion they would be far more effective than Mahrez has ever been, for two reasons: Firstly because, as I mentioned above, they would have far more space to work in while being closed down far less than at Chelsea. And secondly, simply they are superior players! 

Mahrez is a player we do not need unless we are going to completely change our formation and style of play. More in the lines of how City and Liverpool play, which unfortunately is not Antonios style, so not likely to happen.
Ok... well you clearly haven't watched many Leicester games.

 
Ok... well you clearly haven't watched many Leicester games.
I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, such is life. However, the snappy little one liner about me having not watching many Leicester games when you don't know a thing about me is not needed thank you. I have an opinion, you have a differing opinion. Shall we leave it at that.

 
problem is, where would he play in a 3-5-2? i'm genuinely serious because if we can't play pedro or willian, then finding space for mahrez won't happen lol.
We play a 3-5-2 because Pedro and Willian aren't great and it offers us more stability. Bring in a world class winger and we can easily shift back to a 3-4-3.

 
We play a 3-5-2 because Pedro and Willian aren't great and it offers us more stability. Bring in a world class winger and we can easily shift back to a 3-4-3.
3-4-3 would be a far better system for Mahrez, though I'd prefer Sanchez. The problem with that system is still the two in midfield. We've got to prey that Barkley is better than what we already have for that system to work.

 
I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, such is life. However, the snappy little one liner about me having not watching many Leicester games when you don't know a thing about me is not needed thank you. I have an opinion, you have a differing opinion. Shall we leave it at that.
If you'd watched us a decent amount of times, then you'd know that during our championship winning season, we had plenty of teams who just tried to shut up shop against us. Just as they continue to do this season, on current form we'll probably end up 7th, best of the rest. There are plenty of teams who don't want to attack us and just come looking for a point, just as they do you guys.

The difference in those games most of the time? Mahrez. If we were talking about Vardy then fair enough, there is a reason he scores so many goals against the big boys, because the games are usually more open and he gets the space. He does tend to be less effective against a packed defence. Mahrez doesn't have an issue with that.

We played a defensive team on Saturday with 8 defensive players behind the ball and he was still the best player on the pitch.

 
If you'd watched us a decent amount of times, then you'd know that during our championship winning season, we had plenty of teams who just tried to shut up shop against us. Just as they continue to do this season, on current form we'll probably end up 7th, best of the rest. There are plenty of teams who don't want to attack us and just come looking for a point, just as they do you guys.

The difference in those games most of the time? Mahrez. If we were talking about Vardy then fair enough, there is a reason he scores so many goals against the big boys, because the games are usually more open and he gets the space. He does tend to be less effective against a packed defence. Mahrez doesn't have an issue with that.

We played a defensive team on Saturday with 8 defensive players behind the ball and he was still the best player on the pitch.
Ok, lets take your title winning season as an example. At the beginning of that season not one team that played Leicester played against them as if they were playing against title contenders. It wasn't until the game against City in which you won 3-1 that teams actually stood up and took notice. After that most teams played not to lose, rather than trying to win, which meant that they sat back and packed out their defense to try and nullify your attack. Up until and including that game against City, Mahrez scored 14 goals and had 10 assists. Then came Arsenal which you lost, and from then on for the final 13 games where teams sat back to nullify your attack like they do now to Chelsea, guess how many goals Mahrez scored..........3. Guess how many assists he had.......1. 

So yes. He was one of one of you best players that season. Until he had to try and break down a packed defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top