What's new

Tyrique George

Tyrique George has been offered to Napoli and Roma.

Club probably found out no one was willing to pay the £25m Fulham were offering in the summer. Problem is Italian clubs are cheapskates and I would be shocked if anyone offers over £15m. That is on the club; they should have given him solid minutes to get clubs interested.

I don’t understand the logic in trying to get rid of him when you have 2 underperforming wingers. Common sense approach is to loan him to a PL or a Championship club fighting for promotion places, where he will get solid minutes.
Click to expand...
Fulham backed out of the deal because Leeds didn't come for Wilson. Whether he wants a loan is another matter. His future lies elsewhere and I suspect he knows it.

 
Said it before, but we should have just given him some trust instea dof spunking all that money on both Gittens and Garnacho. Sign Garnacho if you absolutely have to, but not Gittens as well. I am 99% sure if we'd given George a vast majority of the minutes those 2 have had, he'd have produced more. Especially than Gittens has.
Click to expand...
I’m sorry but he just isn’t that good as a winger.

One of the very few things Maresca got half right was putting him striker(ofc he still got in wrong in the end as he didn’t adapt system to having a small striker) as he needs to be in and around the box at all times to make use of his only redeeming quality which is his shooting. Maybe if you give him a Salah like role he could blossom too.

The real issue is us making two signings that don’t really elevate us rather than us not using/trying to sell George.

 
He's not great, no. No really good enough. But he could have progressed if given the chances that Gittens and Garnacho have had, and saved us a lot of money.

 
I honestly can't see how anyone can make a definitive assessment of the lad considering how few Premier League games he has started for us. ?

He's still a teenager isn't he . I don't suppose he'll be given a run in the team anyway, we'll be looking for a pure profit for him after spending a ridiculous amount on Gittens.

 
Everton are interested in a loan deal as a cover for the injured Grealish. Ideally would have preferred a loan with a Top 3 Championship team where he can rack up loads of mins

 
Do it Tyrique, make it happen. You need to get away from CFC LDN to make a career for yourself.
Click to expand...
Agreed, for his sake though I'd sooner a permanent move. Our PL loans often don't work out.

 
Had a decent 21 mins cameo V Fulham and had a hand in one of their goals. Based on the highlights, I am certain he would have done more that Garnacho & Gittens given the same mins. Majority of Everton fans are impressed, and wonder if there are any other players to be taken off us.

 
Had a decent 21 mins cameo V Fulham and had a hand in one of their goals. Based on the highlights, I am certain he would have done more that Garnacho & Gittens given the same mins. Majority of Everton fans are impressed, and wonder if there are any other players to be taken off us.
Click to expand...
Taxi for Garnacho!

30-12-22-manchester-united-785615044.jpg


 
Had a decent 21 mins cameo V Fulham and had a hand in one of their goals. Based on the highlights, I am certain he would have done more that Garnacho & Gittens given the same mins. Majority of Everton fans are impressed, and wonder if there are any other players to be taken off us.
Click to expand...
100 percent better than than Garnacho, Gittens still hope will come good. Another sh*t decision by the scum who own and run us.

 
“Everton turned down the original £25m buy option after George's quiet loan spell with 11 appearances and 350 minutes but no goals or assists. Fresh negotiations offer a lower upfront fee plus add-ons that could reach Chelsea's asking price, with a deal possibly done by week's end to boost David Moyes' rebuild.”

Common sense is to sell for £15-£17.5m, add a buyback at £40m, and a sell on clause at 20%. Would do the same for Essugo, Sarr, and unfortunately Acheampong. That is what Madrid & Barca do with their youngsters.

If they are not going to get regular game, which is harder without European football, pointless wasting everyone’s time. Loan moves hardly work anymore since the loaner team isn’t invested long term. Josh came through as a wonderkid at 18, he is 20 yrs now, and has been messed about for the last 2 seasons.

 
“Everton turned down the original £25m buy option after George's quiet loan spell with 11 appearances and 350 minutes but no goals or assists. Fresh negotiations offer a lower upfront fee plus add-ons that could reach Chelsea's asking price, with a deal possibly done by week's end to boost David Moyes' rebuild.”

Common sense is to sell for £15-£17.5m, add a buyback at £40m, and a sell on clause at 20%. Would do the same for Essugo, Sarr, and unfortunately Acheampong. That is what Madrid & Barca do with their youngsters.

If they are not going to get regular game, which is harder without European football, pointless wasting everyone’s time. Loan moves hardly work anymore since the loaner team isn’t invested long term. Josh came through as a wonderkid at 18, he is 20 yrs now, and has been messed about for the last 2 seasons.
Click to expand...
I honestly think his treatment has been appalling. Gittens/ Garnacho/ Mudryk are no better. I wonder what George's value would have been if he'd played for us.

No idea where George goes from here, but despite the absolute dross and failures ahead of him, it isnt going to be with us. We spent 100 million on gittens and gar nacho... 100 million pounds...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top