We nearly won it last season without a world class strikerSame old same old from me. You can't win the league with one striker. What's costa going to do, play 90 minutes for 60 games? We will finish 3rd or 4th unless we sort this out, like we have every season torres is involved.
Why would a striker need to play 60 games to win the league, the league is only 38 games.Same old same old from me. You can't win the league with one striker. What's costa going to do, play 90 minutes for 60 games? We will finish 3rd or 4th unless we sort this out, like we have every season torres is involved.
Walcott did for most of a season a few years back and scored 22 goals and 18 assists in all comps. Not bad.Debatable I'd say both haven't played there regularly
When was this cause I don't remember him playing regularly as a CF for Arsenal?Walcott did for most of a season a few years back and scored 22 goals and 18 assists in all comps. Not bad.
Well I assume we'll want to have a go in cl and fa cup too.Why would a striker need to play 60 games to win the league, the league is only 38 games.
Anyone know Costa's appearance total last season? Its got to be around 50+
For some reason I think this is rather bad than good..http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/28778605
BBC pundits tipping us in the majority.
The Guardian football writers also have us tipped as well.
That has never happened. He played a couple of games there last season or the season before, and I think he scored a hat trick against Newcastle.Walcott did for most of a season a few years back and scored 22 goals and 18 assists in all comps. Not bad.
So why wouldn't Costa be able to play around 55 games?Well I assume we'll want to have a go in cl and fa cup too.
He played 52 matched last season, according to wikipedia, which isn't too bad. The English league might be more physically intensive but he appears to be built for it, and despite what people assume he doesn't actually get suspended that much. There's always a chance he could pick up an injury, and without him our strike force would be even weaker than last season. That said, although he missed several games last season with minor thigh and hamstring injuries, he does not appear to be particularly injury prone.So why wouldn't Costa be able to play around 55 games?
The thing is with speculating about potential injuries is that its purely that, speculative. If Fabregas gets injured the midfield will look a bit pedestrian.He played 52 matched last season, according to wikipedia, which isn't too bad. The English league might be more physically intensive but he appears to be built for it, and despite what people assume he doesn't actually get suspended that much. There's always a chance he could pick up an injury, and without him our strike force would be even weaker than last season. That said, although he missed several games last season with minor thigh and hamstring injuries, he does not appear to be particularly injury prone.