The market dictates the price. Agreed - he shouldn't be £70M - just as Butland shouldn't be anywhere near £30M. City 'only' paid around €40M for Ederson last summer - and to be fair he's the second choice behind Alisson for Brazil - but still. I'd say that they're pretty much at the same level - given what I've seen.Not worth £70m...take Butland at £30m...new 'keeper Nicholas Tie has just signed his first professional contract with us...looks a good prospect...
I'd argue a quality keeper is more important than a midfielder.Plenty of rumour about this one, reports suggesting Courtois will be sold to Real Madrid and Alisson is already lined up to replace him.
Seems odd to invest so heavily on 'keeper in my opinion when we seem so reluctant to invest similar fees on outfield players.
That's a tough one. The right midfielder can control and run the game, while the right keeper kan save a game (or points, as a minimum).I'd argue a quality keeper is more important than a midfielder.
2 seasons ago, Zappacosta had the 2nd highest crossing percentage in Serie A and I was fooled then. Still reserving my judgment on him.The market dictates the price. Agreed - he shouldn't be £70M - just as Butland shouldn't be anywhere near £30M. City 'only' paid around €40M for Ederson last summer - and to be fair he's the second choice behind Alisson for Brazil - but still. I'd say that they're pretty much at the same level - given what I've seen.
However I think we should give Alisson the benefit of a doubt. As Robert Negrisolo said:
"I don't think many people have realised who Alisson is. The guy is a phenomenon. He's the number one of number ones. He is the Messi of Goalkeepers."
Furthermore, if we're looking at the higest save percentage in the big five leagues last season, Alisson was in 4th highest with 79.7 % - only beaten be De Gea, Ter Stegen and Oblak.
Not saying he's definately worth the money - but there is a pretty clear cut reason that he's priced at the value he is. If we can get around £60M for Courtois, I'll take it any day of the week.
I see your argument and raise you selling Matic and buying Bakayoko.I'd argue a quality keeper is more important than a midfielder.
I disagree. The midfield is the most important aspect of a football team. There is a reason why it's called the engine room. A grear keeper can save you 15 points but a great midfield can carry you to the title.I'd argue a quality keeper is more important than a midfielder.
Haha! Yeah, I see your point. I never really understood that transfer to be honest. Alright, he's fast, has great stamina and can deliver a decent cross from time to time. But he just doesn't look like a real Chelsea wingback to me. He don't seem like a player that would ever be expected to be the first choice nor a fan-favorite.2 seasons ago, Zappacosta had the 2nd highest crossing percentage in Serie A and I was fooled then. Still reserving my judgment on him.
I disagree. A keeper could be called on once or twice a game, a midfielder is being called on for 90 minutes of everything game. Without a midfielder, the team doesn't work.I'd argue a quality keeper is more important than a midfielder.
That once or twice a game is more valuable though isn't it? You can work all game in midfield and be 8/10 without giving up a chance or scoring and who knows if you've won or lost. A GK who puts in a top level performance like that can directly win or save his team points.I disagree. A keeper could be called on once or twice a game, a midfielder is being called on for 90 minutes of everything game. Without a midfielder, the team doesn't work.
I disagree. The midfield is the most important aspect of a football team. There is a reason why it's called the engine room. A grear keeper can save you 15 points but a great midfield can carry you to the title.
I would argue the fact a keeper will only be called on once or twice proves how important it is to get the right one. Top keepers at clubs like ours spend 85% of the game twiddling their thumbs, the reason they are the best is because they can maintain concentration for that one important moment where they are called upon. Theres a real dearth of top quality keepers around at the moment, getting one is a must if you want to win the top trophies.I disagree. A keeper could be called on once or twice a game, a midfielder is being called on for 90 minutes of everything game. Without a midfielder, the team doesn't work.
The only argument I have for that specific example would be, Liverpool's midfield wasn't great tbh. They were carved by Real's midfield like a Christmas turkey. I'd say the best last man is a GK.That once or twice a game is more valuable though isn't it? You can work all game in midfield and be 8/10 without giving up a chance or scoring and who knows if you've won or lost. A GK who puts in a top level performance like that can directly win or save his team points.
Mids can definitely influence the flow of the match but ultimately I think the gk position does more to determine results. We've seen Kante be his usual self and we still drop points. It's not his fault mind you but it's more of a collective effort than GKing.
Theres a point where your GK only needs to be so good, Real for example have a very good but not great keeper and they've won a few CL trophies with him. Compare that to Karius in the final and you have a great example of poor GKing losing matches. Do Liverpool concede 2 of those 3 if they have a class GK?
I have this argument with my football friends. I'd take a great keeper and average MF over a great MF and average keeper any day.
The point is, take a keeper from a lower end team in the league, he still pulls off brilliant saves and keeps his team in games, now vs Tibo, I mean the gulf in what they actually do is very limited in the bigger picture, and PL even Championship goalie will go basically the same job give or take playing out and distribution, now take a lower end midfield vs cities and you'll see how much the gulf in performance is between a good and a poor midfield. On another note I really don't like Tibo his heart has never seemed in it, I'd be very happy for him to go, he is a Diva and the constant Real rumours are disruptive, and I used to rate him, I think he has filed to meet the potential he showed at AthleticoThat once or twice a game is more valuable though isn't it? You can work all game in midfield and be 8/10 without giving up a chance or scoring and who knows if you've won or lost. A GK who puts in a top level performance like that can directly win or save his team points.
Mids can definitely influence the flow of the match but ultimately I think the gk position does more to determine results. We've seen Kante be his usual self and we still drop points. It's not his fault mind you but it's more of a collective effort than GKing.
Theres a point where your GK only needs to be so good, Real for example have a very good but not great keeper and they've won a few CL trophies with him. Compare that to Karius in the final and you have a great example of poor GKing losing matches. Do Liverpool concede 2 of those 3 if they have a class GK?
I have this argument with my football friends. I'd take a great keeper and average MF over a great MF and average keeper any day.
Massive step up to go in the first team squad. he ain’t even the u21 keeper that lad we signed from Barca isNot worth £70m...take Butland at £30m...new 'keeper Nicholas Tie has just signed his first professional contract with us...looks a good prospect...