It's an appointment that shows where England really are right now; a lower tier, second rate side.
I think England are in the second tier of international football on paper, but their results have been below the second tier.
Countries I would consider 1st tier on paper, not necessarily actual results. In other words, on paper they'd expected to beat just about anyone.
Argentina
Belgium
France
Germany
Spain
Based on this list, Belgium have been major underachievers and Spain lately as well.
2nd tier on paper. Beating teams in the above list would be an overachievement, and losing to teams in the lower lists would be an underachievement.
Lots of underachievers here. Some of them underachieve so much that they don't seem to be in the second tier on paper until you go through their lineup and see how many top players there are.
Brazil (they've gone to sh*t and are no longer 1st tier on paper. Neymar is their only real quality player)
Chile
Croatia
England
Italy
Netherlands
Portugal
Switzerland
Uruguay
This is off the top of my head, and I'm sure I'm missing some. I'm also sure you'll disagree with some of the classifications.
Below the second tier, there are plenty of countries that consistently overachieve and can beat second tier teams. Some of them overachieve so much that intuitively they don't seem to be in as low a tier until you go through their lineup and see how few quality players they have. I would say Colombia and Greece are two examples.
But due to the quality gap, they have trouble beating 1st tier teams, even underachieving 1st tier teams.
Through random factors and good/bad days, beating/losing to teams of 1 tier higher/lower aren't big upsets.
The problem with England, and they are definitely not the only ones in the top two tiers, is that they lose to teams 2 or more tiers below them. Sometimes much more below them.