England Captain

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jeeezus Bluenut, it ain't fecking difficult - "caught f*cking one of his England team mates EX-birds if you hadn't realised"
I know - just replying why I was asking the question in the 1st place.

And the mother of his child, ex or not (all argued in the other thread BTW)

As it turns out there maybe a few other in that dressing room and half the opposition, oh and a few supports (if they were in boy bands pre 2000) who have been 'up the girl in question'.

I dunno how Bridge was silly enough to hav a kid with the girl if half his mate had had a go first, sorry if that sounds a bit crude but the more I read she sounds like the Chelsea execrise bike!

Weither Terry looses the armband or not, I doubt Bridge will play in the same side as him again.

 
There seems also to be a gender issue here. Women (and those in touch with their feminine side like YB) seem to be able to accept that once a relationship is over no-one has any claims on anyone anymore. This notion that some weird male bonding thing should prevent anyone from having sexual knowledge of a discarded partner is a mystery to me.If a friend is broken-hearted over the loss of a partner, then I agree it might be more tactful not to rub salt in the wound. But clearly that is not the case.

If I am no longer with someone, then he is free to do exactly what he wants.

The reaction of JT's wife is a totally different kettle of fish. But there is a line of arhgument which would say that had the press not made such a god-awful fuss about it, JT would have scratched his itch, got over it and Mrs JT would have been none the wiser and been spared a lot of embarrassment. For all we know, she may not even have minded him having the odd burger away from home as long as he was discreet about it.
What about if he starts f*cking the woman you sit next to at work, and she knew you still held a flame for him. Would you be pissed off with her? Not even a little?

 
What about if he starts f*cking the woman you sit next to at work, and she knew you still held a flame for him. Would you be pissed off with her? Not even a little?
of course she would be pissed off, and rightly so. but she would still have no real argument, she has no legal grip over him and theres no legal waiting time you know. terry has done wrong but the woman he slept with was single and had no obligation towards any man, wether she had a kid to them or not. or is there some legal waiting time we dont know about?

 
What about if he starts f*cking the woman you sit next to at work, and she knew you still held a flame for him. Would you be pissed off with her? Not even a little?
She would not know I still held a flame for him because I wouldn't go blubbing to people. I would grit my teeth and wish her well. I might be pissed off with him, but not with her.

 
of course she would be pissed off, and rightly so. but she would still have no real argument, she has no legal grip over him and theres no legal waiting time you know. terry has done wrong but the woman he slept with was single and had no obligation towards any man, wether she had a kid to them or not. or is there some legal waiting time we dont know about?
But I though Bridge was his mate?

Oh well, alls fair in love, war and swinging then.

No legal witing time in this case by the sound of it, by all accounts Bridge stuck it in as Mutu pulled it out!?!

 
In fact this is a bit of a cock and poule story!

(Have to explain this joke for non-linguists!)

A poule is French for a hen, but it's also a whore/tart/prostitute.

 
In fact this is a bit of a cock and poule story!(Have to explain this joke for non-linguists!)

A poule is French for a hen, but it's also a whore/tart/prostitute.
What..they've got Hens that are prostitutes in France? blimey I thought it was a farmer next door to the House I had out there..turns out it was a Pimp :unsure:

 
What..they've got Hens that are prostitutes in France? blimey I thought it was a farmer next door to the House I had out there..turns out it was a Pimp :unsure:
and a pimp is "un maquereau" so they have mackerel pimping hens - trans-species stuff!

 
Its all a bit pathetic really,

has JT broken the law? no

I pretty much agree with Yorkyblue, people are f**king about on there partners every sinigle day of there lives for one reason or another.

Spining it on it's head for a moment what if terry had alerady decided that his marrige was dead and sets up shop with brigdes ex (as she will now be refferd to for the rest of her life.) because that is actually what he really wants, that what he needs to be happy in his life.

Is he still to be condemed or possibley admired for making some very hard choices that are going to suck in the short term but in the long term could be best for every one including himself. In my oppinion as long as he remains an ever present farther there is no problem. Not all marriges work our and being a football player doesn't make you any different.

That could not be the case at all, its just one view point. And to be honest who actually cares.. the only thing that actually matters is that JT is by far the most natrual leader in the squad. Cappelo's job is to try and win the world cup , having JT as captian is one step in the right direction. Bridge doesn't need to like him, he just has to do a job and the way his form is going he may not even be required to do that

 
John Terry should retain the captaincy.

What he has done should be sorted between him and his wife. It has nothing to do with anyone else.

Whatever you think of him as a man should be kept apart from what you think of him as a professional footballer.

He is an adulterer - no more than that.

The man who will be KING is an adulterer.

The last Conservative PRIME MINISTER was an adulterer (if Edwina Currie can be believed!)

These people run the country and nothing has happened to them!

Did not a previous England manager commit adultery with a secretary from the FA?

It is, as we all know, rife in all walks of life. JT should not be punished for doing what thousands do every day.

I for one, look forward to the day that he holds the world cup aloft and rams all this back down the throats of the media!

 
The whole thing is absurd- the woman is an ex-girlfriend, Bridge doesn't own her and at most he has betaryed the friendship and personal loyalty he owed Bridge. There's nothing socially unacceptable about what he's done- unforuntately for Bridge "Being a loyal friend to Wayne Bridge" is not a pre-requisite for being the England captain. Don't get me wrong Bridge is a player I've always admired even when he replaced king Le Saux prematurely- he makes it hard not to. But let's not confuse a question of loyalty with a question of ethics. It's not as if he is selling drugs to children or spending his saturday evenings with Bluebeard- he just screwed bridge's ex-girlfriend. Question of personal loyalty.

 
John Terry hasn't done anything wrong apart from being a good defender. Don't the Coach normally tell you, if a full back leaves a hole, it's the job of the centre back to fill it.

 
Capello aide Stuart Pearce backing Terry...surprise surprise :rolls eyes:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...art-Pearce.html

Isnt it hilarious how every football mind without a political agenda of their own is backing Terry?

Seems like those whose first interest is to win the WC wants JT to captain.....

I wonder what the motives are for those who want JT out! man my eyes are getting tired from all this rolling!

 
Capello aide Stuart Pearce backing Terry...surprise surprise :rolls eyes:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...art-Pearce.html

Isnt it hilarious how every football mind without a political agenda of their own is backing Terry?

Seems like those whose first interest is to win the WC wants JT to captain.....

I wonder what the motives are for those who want JT out! man my eyes are getting tired from all this rolling!
Graham Taylor doesn't have a political agenda regarding the WC nor does Stan Collymore or numerous others who have come out in support of JT. They are coming out in support of him keeping the captaincy because it is the right decision to make.

 
Lamps , but Gerrard is favourite. Im sure Cappello will have said to him, your still the leader , just not wearing the armband.

Just worried how it might affect him if they win the W.C. but he dosent get to lift the trophy , that would be very tough on him.

 
I heard though a mate who knows staff at Man Utd that Ferdinand is properly crocked .. at least that is the word round the cmap fire as it were.

I am told that if he plays on for much longer he risks permenant back damage..

Like I say it was a bit of gossip I got from a mate nothing more, but he had no reason to lie to me.. so who knows certainly looking a shadow of his former self this season.

Cant wait to see what Capello has to say.. he migh have onyl dropped JT temporarily ... if he was to win some major trophies as captain of Chelsea this season and is insperational between now and May he might be forced to re-instate him

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top