Bates says on the London Programme from 1982 that Chelsea are far to big a club to be where it is, he also says in 20 years i'll have the club in Europe, he nearly made it in 84/85 with us just missing out but then the scousers went on a murdering rampage so it was irrelevant anyway, but then he was proved right albeit a bit later with us in Europe in 94/95.I'll happily put myself down as another 'fan' of Batesy. Maybe fan is not the right word though. His politics and outlook on life and mine would likely be very different, if it wasn't for his CFC connection I wouldn't ever want to invite him over for a dinner party or chat with him in a pub.
Be that as it may I prefer to deal in facts not 'might have beens'. Batesy fought the battle to save the club. No one else did. He might have done it for selfish reasons, he might have been the only one who could see the potential of the club in the early 80s and figured he could do well out of it in the long term. Frankly I don't really care. He was there when no one else was and he fought like the bar steward he was to keep the club going. Sure, a different owner with more money and a more likeable personality would have been nice. But there wasn't one. And that's a fact.
Moving on to some conjecture. Had he not been our chairman/owner at that time, how many of you could see CFC existing in the way we knew it then and the way we know it now? Would we still be at the Bridge? Would we even be called Chelsea FC? Yes, that's conjecture, we don't know for certain who might have stepped in had Batesy not done so and they might have been more successful in saving us earlier and done it with a smile on their face and a great rapport with the media. But, again, what I know for a fact is that Batesy did the job and, all things considered, did it pretty well.
I used to own the 'Best of FOUL', which was superb. As you say, a mix of hilarious stuff and investigative features. Sadly, I lent to a mate back in my college days and he never gave it back :-(Quite agree mate. V easy for the guy on the terrace to see MH as one of their own and Uncle Ken as the corporate bad guy. The truth is always somewhere in between.
By the way, does anyone remember (and miss) the old FOUL magazine in the old days. Bit like a Private Eye of football, half jokey (foul of the month etc which normally won by R Harris!) and half investigative journalism into boardroom skulduggery etc. Had great writers like Chris Lightbown et al. If anyone has any old copies I'd love to see em.
the CPO was the best thing Bates left us with...as for MH loaning us money instead of giving us money, that just what RA has done,,,our debt to him is in a holding company and stands at £700 million.Also not forgetting Bates introduced the CPO scheme which was genius looking back, how to stop any future property developers raping the club? i know i'll let the fans own a part of the ground. Legend.
I think you answered your own question there blue !I havent read one valid reason why Bates gets grief?
Like i said he was a c**t at times but also done a lot of good.
But he also left a club with £250m of fixed assets and annual revenues of £130m, owned our own modern stadium, had just qualified for the Champions League, had had recent success, etc. Things that made us attractive to someone like RA in the first place, and a lot healthier than when Bates took over.I see the "Bates saved Chelsea" myth is still doing the rounds....unless you believe that Bates was able to engineer a market and property crash that scuppered Marler Estates, there's no way he "saved" us.....ok, he used our money to fight a protected battle through the courts and that was because Chelsea provided him with a nice little earner.
And if Ossie thinks he left us in a healthier state, he mustn't have heard about the £80 million debt we were in at the time of our sale to RA.......Bates got lucky on both occasions, any of us could have done the job, and with more good grace I should imagine. His programme notes were always a laugh though, and the CPO was a masterstroke, for which we all should be thankful, although RA might not agree !
that's true mate....but we were a matter of weeks away from defaulting on that loan, a eurobond if I recall correctly.But yes, we certainly moved forward in terms of the football,,,,as for the stadium, it breaks my heart to see the shedend boxed in and overwhelmed by the hotels,,,a venture that initially drained money away from the club.But he also left a club with £250m of fixed assets and annual revenues of £130m, owned our own modern stadium, had just qualified for the Champions League, had had recent success, etc. Things that made us attractive to someone like RA in the first place, and a lot healthier than when Bates took over.