Radford10

Hes good enough to play early round cup games or the odd match, plus we cant discount the influence he has on the dressing room and the youngsters at the club.
As the 5th/6th choice in a back 3 i dont see why you wouldnt keep him on for another year at least. 
Only guessing but id say he'd be content with that role also.

Its amazing, he just keeps getting better.
I was hoping for a lwb upgrade this year but if he keeps turning in performances like 2nd half burnley and spurs away we would be mad to spend £60m on sandro.

We kept only 4 clean sheets in the prem after xmas.
Goals are good also but you have to judge on his defending. Plus the 'crucial' Stoke goal came after he needlessly fouled Walters and gave away the Pen.
Some of the criticism of Cahill on this page is over the top but he is the weak link in the back 3. Doesn't mean he's a bad player, you just have to look at improving. 
He's slow and nervous on the ball (maybe to do with him being on the left side) and is pretty poor in 1 v 1 situations. However, no one smells danger quicker than him. He has usually smelt danger, dealt with it and back in position before Luiz has even realised something is happening haha. 
Also, judging a player on his ability to play well in the CL next year by his performance 5 years ago is probably not a good idea.