BarnetBlue73

also, that looks at the 4 bigger clubs. but fulham and qpr surely must have been the majority supported in some areas. they are tiny compared to us but still....

cheers for the reply! surprised west ham's support extended that far???? thought spurs would have made more of an impact in northeast london (like woodford). guess spurs would have been the second most supported clubs in lots of those north and east london areas. chelsea definitly couldn't have had been the majority in all those areas. lived near harrow and none of the people i knew supported them. great map though.

Was just wandering how support for the 3 clubs is split across west london. Although born in battersea, I grew up in Barnet around Arsenal and Spurs fans so never been too sure. I assume that Chelsea got most of its fans from South-West London (Mitcham, Battersea etc.) and that QPR were mainly supported in areas like Hounslow and Ealing while Fulham were scattered around in small numbers. I could be completly wrong so appreciate anyone who could correct me. I'm talking more about where fans traditionally came from as London has changed loads since I grew up in the 70s and now everyone in west London probably supports us due to recent success (apart from the United gloryhunters). Thanks in advance!