Simple question, are you happy with Zappacosta? Or would you have preferred Candreva?
 

Edited September 4, 20178 yr by TomCFC85

I can't really answer it as have never seen zappacosta play. i have seen candreva play a few times and he looked decent, but it would be nice to see zappacosta play first. however, candreva is 28 and zappacosta is 24, so the latter has got time on his side to improve as a player, especially under conte. 

Sandro.

1 minute ago, OverAndOut said:

Sandro.

Well, Everton got him and to be fair, he was excellent at keeping the ball away from our net. 

I suspect the truth is that most of us on the forum are unqualified to be able to provide a genuinely insightful comment or vote to your thread, as most of us hadn't even realised there was a played called Zappacosta, let alone how good he is.

Although, saying that, having watched the obligatory YouTube highlights of him, he has good English and can deliver a wicked cross in, which automatically puts him about 10 divisions above Moses. He also has youth on his side compared to Candreva, so on that basis alone, I'm going to stick with Zappa as my vote.