Butch Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Dear Friends, Here are the latest BPL standings after the 1-0 win over the Hammers at the Bridge. CONGRATS this time go to yours truly! [table=Butch’s Prediction League Standings 2007-2008:3ipo7k6f] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name Gp St Sb FS Pe Sc TG Pr Bo To Cu Av Rt Ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 01 Loz 21 8 3 15 2 0 0 5 0 128 3382 161 182 -1 02 Ossie13 20 8 1 15 4 0 0 5 0 106 3227 161 181 -2 03 Butch 22 8 3 30 0 0 0 5 50 195 3405 155 177 +3 04 TT 22 8 2 15 4 5 0 5 0 121 3324 151 173 -1 05 Terje 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 335 168 170 na 06 Nick White 19 7 2 15 2 0 0 5 0 108 2786 147 166 -1 07 Liam 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 489 163 166 na 08 Crystalballs 22 9 2 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 3108 141 163 +2 09 Chippy 01 8 3 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 161 161 162 na 10 Pauly 12 8 3 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 1773 148 160 +2 11 Coombsie 20 8 1 15 2 0 0 10 0 113 2688 134 154 -1 12 Tim W 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1001 143 150 na 13 Dan Harkin 18 8 0 15 4 0 0 0 0 91 2332 130 148 -1 14 SergeyMS 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 140 146 na 15 MadMac 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001 125 141 na 16 TrubishBob 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1187 132 141 na 17 Lukasz 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 658 132 137 na 18 Derek Dove 20 7 1 15 4 0 0 5 0 96 2252 113 133 +1 19 Wycliffe 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 119 123 na 20 TeaBarBoy 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 114 117 na 21 Yogic 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 113 116 na 22 Mike O 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 111 113 na 23 Amaju 01 7 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 93 93 93 94 na 24 Usman A 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 81 83 na ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [/table:3ipo7k6f] [table=BPL Winners’ Circle 2007-2008:3ipo7k6f] ------------------------------ Rank Name Wins ------------------------------ 01 Butch 5 02 Ossie13 4 TT 4 03 Loz 3 Nick White 3 04 Pauly 2 05 Coombsie 1 Crystalballs 1 Lukasz 1 SergeyMS 1 TimW 1 ------------------------------ [/table:3ipo7k6f] [table=BPL Top Scores 2007-2008:3ipo7k6f] -------------------------------------------------------------- Rank Score Predictor(s) -------------------------------------------------------------- 1 265 Butch (Schalke04 – home – CL) 2 259 Loz (Rosenborg – away – CL) Ossie13 (Rosenborg – away – CL) 3 248 TimW (Man City – home – EPL) 4 240 Butch (Liverpool – away – EPL) 5 238 Loz (Schalke – away – CL) TT (Middlesbrough – away – EPL) 6 230 Loz (Wigan – away – EPL) 7 225 Loz (Schalke04 – home – CL) Pauly (Valencia – away – CL) 8 223 Nick White (Everton – home – EPL) 9 218 Ossie13 (Bolton – away – EPL) TT (Portsmouth – home- EPL) 10 216 Nick White (Schalke – away – CL) -------------------------------------------------------------- [/table:3ipo7k6f] Cheers, Butch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loz Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Formatting issue there mate - no doubt to do with the new version. Let me know if you can't sort it and we will see what we can do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loz Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Worked it out Butch - the table is being limited to the width of the header i.e. 'Butch’s Prediction League Standings 2007-2008' - easiest way round it is what I have done below. Simply add ________________ either side of the title to extend it's width. You will need to do the same with the 'BPL Top Scores 2007-2008' table If you look at the Rosenboorg update I have tweaked that and I think it is right now. You could always just use that as a template for future ones. I'm sure there is a more technical fix but I'll leave that to fans of 'Wargames' (Mod?) p.s. TT - Who are ya, Who are ya [table=___________________Butch’s Prediction League Standings 2007-2008___________________:1xr77e9i] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name Gp St Sb FS Pe Sc TG Pr Bo To Cu Av Rt Ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 01 Loz 21 8 3 15 2 0 0 5 0 128 3382 161 182 -1 02 Ossie13 20 8 1 15 4 0 0 5 0 106 3227 161 181 -2 03 Butch 22 8 3 30 0 0 0 5 50 195 3405 155 177 +3 04 TT 22 8 2 15 4 5 0 5 0 121 3324 151 173 -1 05 Terje 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 335 168 170 na 06 Nick White 19 7 2 15 2 0 0 5 0 108 2786 147 166 -1 07 Liam 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 489 163 166 na 08 Crystalballs 22 9 2 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 3108 141 163 +2 09 Chippy 01 8 3 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 161 161 162 na 10 Pauly 12 8 3 15 4 5 0 5 30 161 1773 148 160 +2 11 Coombsie 20 8 1 15 2 0 0 10 0 113 2688 134 154 -1 12 Tim W 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1001 143 150 na 13 Dan Harkin 18 8 0 15 4 0 0 0 0 91 2332 130 148 -1 14 SergeyMS 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 837 140 146 na 15 MadMac 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001 125 141 na 16 TrubishBob 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1187 132 141 na 17 Lukasz 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 658 132 137 na 18 Derek Dove 20 7 1 15 4 0 0 5 0 96 2252 113 133 +1 19 Wycliffe 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 119 123 na 20 TeaBarBoy 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 114 117 na 21 Yogic 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 113 116 na 22 Mike O 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 111 113 na 23 Amaju 01 7 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 93 93 93 94 na 24 Usman A 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 81 83 na ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [/table:1xr77e9i] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted December 4, 2007 Author Share Posted December 4, 2007 Formatting issue there mate - no doubt to do with the new version. Let me know if you can't sort it and we will see what we can do Not sure I follow what the issue is, Loz. Please explain. I mean, I understand that the width of the table can be expanded by expanded the width of the title of the table, but it is displaying fine on my screen as is. How is it displaying on your screen? Are the columns being scrunched together? Cheers, Butch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loz Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 On my screen the rows stretch over two lines - see picture below However could be that it is just my settings - anyone else having any problems with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 Same for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butch Posted December 4, 2007 Author Share Posted December 4, 2007 The problem dear friends, clearly, is that you should all be using macs. Cheers, Butch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts