loz

You seem to have put an 'h' where you meant to put a 'd'

We haven't actually signed him yet have we? Hard to see there is any value bringing him in which makes me wonder if there is a possibility we kill the deal. Killing that deal and punting Enzo and Garnacho would be an Argentinian exodus on a par with Chile in the copper mining season

That was a glorious surrender monkey by Tuchel. You can't surrender the middle of the park for that long against Argentina. Then, to compound it, when they equalise with a chunk of time to go, do nothing whilst waiting for extra time

I am not as fussed about this one as some are.
There are certainly a lot of other players who i would rather see leave before Santos however I'm not convinced he is going to develop into anything over and above a good but not a great player. I feel £50m is probably about right and, given our self inflicted, financial challenges was an offer we had to accept.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

Talks more sh*te than Tony Adams after 12 pints and 7 whisky chasers

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

I thought he was about the least influential of the Argentinian midfield and was rightly hooked. He has done very little in this World Cup in what has been a decidedly, at least on paper, easy run to the semi finals. Only one semi tough game against Egypt.

I thought he was about the least influential of the Argentinian midfield and was rightly hooked. He has done very little in this World Cup in what has been a decidedly, at least on paper, easy run to the semi finals. Only one semi tough game against Egypt.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

Come on. This is a fantastic result that should be celebrated across the whole of the United Kingdom. Because we're all one nation really. Even your blokes that wear skirts and knee high socks Loz

Reece isn't covering himself in glory so far.

Pathetic by Guehi. Get the f**k up. Its a world cup quarter final.

England need to hook Rice and Madueke at half time. Madueke is up against a championship full back but offering f**k all. Rice is at 40% at best

England need to hook Rice and Madueke at half time. Madueke is up against a championship full back but offering f**k all. Rice is at 40% at best

England need to hook Rice and Madueke at half time. Madueke is up against a championship full back but offering f**k all. Rice is at 40% at best

.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

.

.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.

You can rarely say that without person X a football club wouldn't exist and have it be entirely true.
In Ken's case it is 100% true. Sure he had his faults, don't we all, but he was our faulty bustard and we owe him a debt of honour that money could never have bought in that particular era of football.