hephzibah

I will say it again. I hope Gallagher's fans had a great game today.

Caicedo tonight as a defensive midfielder had a great game, you idiot. Enzo's age is still affecting him, that's his problem, but you can see he will improve. His price tag is the reality of the transfer market. But Gallagher is just so bad, he doesn't deserve to be in the team.

I hope Gallagher's fans had a great match.

If you could fight with a lion and kill it, should it be difficult for you to fight with a cockroach and kill it? You are insane, you are even talking. You are making fun of my comment, if you have evil, keep it to yourself, don't bring it near me. The team is doing badly because so many of you fans are evil. I thought fans of a club will support the club, but I've seen that these fans don't like this team. I joined the fans' forum because you would think the other fans of the team will like the team, but clearly these fans hate this team. I feel so sorry for this team because of the kind of fans they have. They can't do well because of the kind of fans they have. Some people don't have any form of positivity in them, it's all negativity. It's already affecting the team. There is no oneness in the team. Look at City, Liverpool etc. Their teams are happy. But there is anger inside the Chelsea team. The fans attack all their players. They attack Cucurella, they are even so mean to attack a player like Reece James, you would think they like him when they made him their captain, they attack Chilwell, they attack their goalkeeper, they attack their defense, they attack the midfielders, they attack the wingers. That means they don't want the team to exist again. If there are no players, there is no team. So why are you still calling yourselves fans of the club? You can as well go to your homes, there is nothing like Chelsea again.

So it's only after our point at Etihad that you know we are good? You don't know we are good before? Even Klopp thinks it is only because we got a point at Etihad, that he thinks we are good, so he doesn't think all the players we have are good? As a football manager, he is lying, he knows we are good, he just won't say the truth. For someone like him to say that, I have no respect for him. So many of our fans write us off, we drew City twice this season meaning we are at par with them and should be at thesame level with them in the league, if not higher. Our fans have no pride again, what happened to our pride? We are by no means inferior to Liverpool or City. We should go to this final with our pride.

Why didn't it work out? He lost possession a few times, so you think it won't work out. He was probably not in the game that day, does it mean it won't work. Some people already going for Gallagher in the starting line up, whether he is good or not, a player who for me is one of the most terrible players in that team. Let Palmer be consistent in the midfield, the manager should prepare him. He will be ok there. I remember when Mourinho said "Oscar is my number 10". That's the kind of thing Palmer needs. The midfield is a technical position. You can't be playing a player who is not technical in the midfield. Gallagher is so not technical to be playing in our attacking midfield, it's an abberation. It's the job of an attacking midfielder to create chances for the attackers, Gallagher cannot create chances for the attackers, that is why I said Palmer can play there, it's better that Palmer plays there, than for Gallagher to be playing there. It seems Palmer will be able to create chances. He can create chances for the attackers, this is why I said it is better we play Palmer than be playing Gallagher.

Terrible response. You've said Palmer's passing is fine. So wouldn't you rather go for a player whose passing is fine than go for Gallagher who can do nothing. I have said even if Palmer's passing is not good, he's still better than Gallagher. Do you disagree that Palmer is better than Gallagher? You say Palmer cannot pass as much as Fabregas can pass, but at least you said Palmer's passing is fine. So it's better you have a Palmer than you have a Gallagher who cannot pass at all.

We've played Fabregas in the Midfield before. Palmer will be playing behind the striker, Fabregas also played behind the striker. Fabregas and Palmer are both not strong, they cannot make much tackles, but they can both pass the ball. So why can't we play Palmer in the Midfield?

Please stop talking about the midfield if you want Gallagher in the Midfield. With all the players Chelsea have, how did Gallagher get into the starting line-up?

Who? Palmer? Wasn't ready to play in the midfield? But Gallagher is ready? You've got to get Palmer ready to play in the midfield. Even if Palmer is not ready, he's still better than Gallagher. We have other people who can play in other positions, but Palmer can play in the midfield.

Enzo remains who he is, he never lowers his game or increases his game. You either like him or you don't like him. Now Chelsea fans say it is a midfield of Gallagher, Enzo and Caicedo, so even if Gallagher spoils the party, it is a Midfield of Gallagher, Enzo and Caicedo, they must all take the blame. Instead of removing Gallagher and playing a better midfield trio, they won't do that.

How did I deserve this? Gallagher in a Chelsea starting line up when I see the kind of players starting for Arsenal, Liverpool, City, United etc. every match. Jackson also starting in an important match when Nkunku can strike. Mudryk is not playing but Gallagher can play.

I've talked about this many times in this forum. I couldn't take it after our first match this season. I couldn't also take Poch being our manager after our first match this season. You are just talking about it after six months.

Poch is not the one to get to work on that. He doesn't know what he is doing. Nkunku can strike, why not play him as the striker? Palmer can be the AM, Madueke and Mudryk on the wings, and Enzo and Caicedo defensive midfield pairing, these are all decent players.

This is your problem, you are always asking for something different. If the team is winning, you still want to change the team. A team is doing badly, I'm proposing the right thing we should do, instead of allowing us to do these right things, and let the team remain like that, you are already thinking that when the team starts doing well, what is our plan B? Let the team starts doing well first. Let them continue that way, don't change them, if a system is working, don't change the system. Some people know the right system that should work for this team, they just want to use another system. That is why I say so many Chelsea fans are dumb, and I say they are specialists in failure. You just want to be using another system just because you want to change the right system, you call it plan B, when you know the system that should work. When we won the league under Mourinho and Ancelloti, we used a single system. Under Conte, we were using a system, it wasn't working after three matches because of the kind of players we had at that time, we changed to another system and stuck with it for the whole season, and we won the league. Even though Conte changed his system, he didn't change his best players, he kept using his best players, that was why he won. Fans today want the manager to keep changing his best players every match, they call it plan B, you can't win like that. A manager can change his formation, but he must not change his best players, he cannot win like that.

What do you mean by plan B? Use the right plan A, let the players get use to the plan, our players do not understand themselves. Let them play a system, develop in the system, keep training the system, that is how you do well in a system. We don't have a starting eleven, that is not a good team, the players don't play together, how will they understand themselves. The team should play together, that will make them strong.

Twelve dumb people love your post. This generation is doing everything they can to protect a poor manager; Pochetino, protect dumb players like Gallagher and fight the good players they have like Enzo, Caicedo, Mudryk and Madueke. They say buying good players is a gamble. They say the team does not have a leader yet they don't play the likes of Madueke and Mudryk because they want to play Sterling and Gallagher, I thought Sterling and Gallagher were intended to be the leaders on the pitch? They can't do it, and we say bench them, Chelsea fans will say don't bench Sterling and Gallagher. Yet Chelsea keeps losing, and you ask yourself, what do Chelsea fans want, do they want the team to keep losing? You don't want to play the players that will make you win, you are playing players that will make you lose. Nkunku can strike, we can play real "attackers" like Mudryk, Madueke and Palmer behind him, and play Enzo and Caicedo. But they don't want this. They never want to hear that we should sack a bad manager, when did this start. Mourinho called Wenger a specialist in failure back then, but it is Chelsea fans today that are specialists in failure. And when the fans don't want the team to succeed, how can I continue to support that team?

If you bought Mbappe, it is only his dumb mistakes you will be looking for. Gallagher is a top player, but when you lose, you blame it on Enzo, Madueke, Mudryk and Caicedo.

The first half was bad, if we had played in the first half like we played in the second half, maybe the scoreline would have been 8-0.

So you don't like fancy passes? What more do you want from his game? He's not much of an attacking midfielder, so he may not score many goals for you, so what more do you want from his game? You don't even want him to be starting for Argentina, because according to you he is overrated, there are many people in Argentina, so they should have many players that are better than him that should be starting, he shouldn't be starting for Argentina? Isn't that so? Terrible people.

It is just unfair on the players that played that people will be saying it is because Gallagher did not play, that was why we lost to United at Old Trafford with the rivalry between Chelsea and United, in the presence of United fans at Old Trafford. Is it Gallagher that will track Mctominay and stop him from scoring two goals against us? We have conceeded several goals this season with Gallagher on the field, nobody blames Gallagher when we conceed goals and Gallagher is playing, we blame other people. How will he stop United from scoring against us?

Since Gallagher is the only player playing well in the team and you say Caicedo is not playing well, maybe we should clone nine other Gallaghers and play ten Gallaghers with the goalkeeper. I think many Chelsea fans will like that. For Caicedo, there are different kinds of DMs in football. Barcelona played for many years with Busquests and he wasn't the most rugged DM in football. It all depends on his partner. We may have an offensive style with Enzo as his partner, that can make us score a lot of goals but concede a few goals. But if his partner is both not very good defensively and not good offensively (this is what is happening now), then we will concede goals and yet not score much goals.

So what has he done this season to appear to be overrated? He lost possession at times in some matches, he can improve on that, but people shouldn't be talking about that at all, he did some other nice things, we can still stick with him, not bring in Gallagher for him. We spent £1b in one year, we bought the players available, we shouldn't be talking about problems, the only problem in the team is Jackson, and Nkunku can replace him now. It should be better times now. We should be talking of 15 wins in a row, we've had it before, if the fans will permit.

Not really bleeding circles. These are the truths. Enzo and Caicedo are definitely better than Gallagher.