world Cup stunning moment

 

The Guardian.    Well worth a read. Thomas was a controversial ref..

World Cup stunning moments: Clive Thomas denies Zico and Brazil

With six seconds of stoppage time played, Clive Thomas blew his whistle a moment before Zico scored to beat Sweden – a decision which reverberated around the world

 

Referee Clive Thomas is surrounded by angry Brazil players after a controversial blowing for full time a moment before Zico scored. Photograph: Popperfoto/Getty Images

 

Simon Burnton

@Simon_Burnton

Tue 24 Apr 2018 15.00 BST

 

28, non-dictatorial and magnanimous are not adjectives I would associate with Clive Thomas,” wrote Clive White in the Times in April 1981, after “a ludicrous penalty award” had handed Wolves a last-minute equaliser against Tottenham in an FA Cup semi-final. “There is a view that the best referees make themselves as inconspicuous as possible. I am not sure that Mr Thomas shares that belief, because the star performer before an audience of 50,000 and millions more peering through the keyhole of television was unquestionably Mr Thomas. It was the Clive Thomas Spectacular Show.

 

Three years later David Lacey described Thomas in the Guardian as “one of football’s better referees”. Yet “when controversy has thrown its arms around Clive’s neck he has tended to linger lovingly in the embrace. What Clive does have is a keen sense of history. The fall of Jericho would have been delayed while Thomas booked the wall. At the Battle of Copenhagen Nelson would have been cautioned for dissent. At Waterloo Blucher would have been sent off for entering the field late and without permission.”

In April 1977 Thomas took charge of another Cup semi, a Merseyside derby, in which he disallowed a perfectly good late winner for Everton – for handball, though he admitted that “in no way could I have seen the ball make contact with his hand or his arm” – because he wasn’t sure what else Bryan Hamilton might have used to divert it into the net (it came off his hip). In the 1981 League Cup final he allowed a 117th-minute Liverpool goal even though the ball passed just over the prostrate and clearly offside Sammy Lee, dismissing his linesman’s raised flag without consultation.

 

Clive Thomas is mobbed by West Ham players after dismissing a linesman’s flag to award a goal for Liverpool.Photograph: Daily Mail/REX/Shutterstock

Then there was the game between West Ham and Birmingham City in February 1974, a tense encounter between two sides battling relegation. The game ended 0-0, but Thomas’s officiating inspired the crowd to launch into a chorus of the then-popular terrace anthem, Oh, Oh, What a Referee! And Thomas joined in with gusto. “There I was on television, singing away,” he wrote. “Ken Aston of Fifa was at that match and he told me I’d had a good game, but I wonder if he saw me doing that singing. I feared that that was not the sort of thing they were looking for.”

Aston, it turned out, was far from offput. Thomas became the second-youngest referee at that summer’s World Cup, and though he took charge of only two group games he was involved, in a manner of speaking, throughout the competition. Referees were still emphatically amateur, and Thomas paid his bills by producing and selling referee’s equipment. And so it was that every official in Argentina sported the Clive Thomas Kit, composed of Terylene shorts and Crimplene jersey. “His experiments with kit,” the Guardian enthused, “have helped to invest the ranks of referees with a little more elegance.”

By the 1978 World Cup Thomas was 41 and in his prime, if no longer in the kit supply business (he worked for an office cleaning company at the time, heading to Argentina with a pledge to make footballers “keep it clean”). To say he failed to enjoy the tournament would be an understatement: in his autobiography Thomas described it as “a month of disillusionment with football administration, my colleagues, the organisation of set-pieces, the general politics of the game and the behaviour of some of those at the highest level”; it was here he was to ascend to international infamy. In his book he describes the moment for which he is now best remembered as “probably the most controversial decision that any referee has ever made, a decision which reverberated around the world”.

His first assignment was a group game between 1958 finalists, Brazil and Sweden. It was not likely to be straightforward, with Brazil carrying the pressure of favouritism and a reputation for brutality. Before the match Sweden’s manager, Georg Ericson, described Brazil as “dirty”. “Thankfully,” he said, “we have got a strong referee in Clive Thomas, generally regarded as the best one here.”

The first 90 minutes have been forgotten. Thomas Sjöberg put Sweden ahead in the 37th minute, and Reinaldo equalised in first-half stoppage time. The score remained 1-1 as the match neared its conclusion. Brazil, pushing for victory, won a corner, and then another, and, in the dying seconds, a third. Nelinho, the right-back, prepared to take it. He was in no hurry. He placed the ball outside the arc, and the Polish linesman, Alojzy Jarguz, told him to move it. Thomas checked his watch. Six seconds of stoppage time had been played, and though the ball had not been in play for any of it, he thought it was almost over. Nelinho finally took the kick and, with the ball in the air, Thomas blew his whistle and turned for the tunnel. Behind him Zico headed the ball into the net. 

 

Brazil’s Zico heads home a fraction of a second after the whistle. Photograph: AP

Brazil had scored their winner, a fraction of a second too late. “I find it unbelievable, incredible,” said their manager, Cláudio Coutinho. “The players are sad, depressed.” (Not as sad as they would be when eventually denied a place in the final after the hosts, needing to win by four goals, thumped Peru 6-0 in a game still seen as suspect.)

In the run-up to the tournament the referees were sent a contract which stipulated they should not speak to the press. Thomas refused to sign it. “You know me,” he told the Mirror in May. “If I’ve got something to say I say it.” And so it was that, minutes after the final whistle in Mar del Plata, there were two British journalists in Thomas’s dressing room. They told him that rumours were circulating that he was to be sent home; he gave them some quotes for the following day’s editions. “I saw the header, but I didn’t see the ball go into the net. I had turned away,” he said. “As far as I was concerned the game was over. The Brazilians have only themselves to blame. They should not have wasted so much time over taking the corner.”

 

Thomas flew back to Buenos Aires, and went straight to bed. He was roused by former Wales rugby union international Cliff Morgan, then BBC head of sport, who, in an unexpected turn of events, took him nightclubbing with David Coleman. He returned in the early hours and “slept the sleep of the just”, but was woken the following morning by Friedrich Seipelt, a member of Fifa’s referee’s committee, who told him he was going home. He would never again take charge of a World Cup match. 

The Welshman was predictably furious. It had been his dream to referee the final, which was eventually officiated by the Italian Sergio Gonella who, according to Thomas, “sounds like a danceband leader and, to my mind, referees like one”.

Thomas continued to referee until 1984, maintaining to the end that his most infamous decision had been correct. “Zico was too late,” he insisted. “Possibly only four-tenths of a second too late, but too late nevertheless.”

I was only thinking about this the other day, when Utd scored that goal against Brighton AFTER the final whistle was blown.

Shocking decision by Thomas to blow the whistle when he did and involving the great Brazil of all teams. Certainly tarnished his reputation but it seems he was thicked skinned enough to think he was in the right.

It wasn’t the only late goal Clive Thomas had controversially disallowed.

In April 1977 very late on during the 1976/77 FA Cup semi-final between Everton and Liverpool.  Everton forward Bryan Hamilton scored what appeared to have been the match winner. 

Most inside Maine Road believed Hamilton had scored.Clive Thomas saw it differently and ruled it out. It ended 2-2 and not 3-2.  Liverpool would win the replay.

It was a shocking decision really, didnt he explain that time was up on his watch so he blew his whistle and he didnt care what was actually happening on the pitch? 

Edited October 2, 20205 yr by dkw

 

Liverpool v Everton FA Cup semi-final 1977: The story of the goal that never was

By DOMINIC KING FOR THE DAILY MAIL 

PUBLISHED: 23:49, 13 April 2012 | UPDATED: 23:49, 13 April 2012 

It was the most contentious refereeing decision in Merseyside derby history. 

In the dying moments of the 1977 FA Cup semi-final, Everton forward Bryan Hamilton turned in a cross from Ronny Goodlass that appeared to have sealed a dramatic 3-2 win.

Everyone inside rain-sodden Maine Road on April 23 believed Hamilton had scored. Crucially, though, Clive Thomas, the Welsh referee, saw it differently and ruled it out; 35 years on, the controversy continues to rage.

Evertonians remain scarred by the decision. Had the goal stood, they felt it would have sparked a period of sustained success. 

 

No goal: Thomas rules out the effort... much to Everton's displeasure

 

Liverpudlians, by contrast, never pass up the opportunity to mention the name of Thomas ahead of every key game between the sides.

 

So strong is the lingering sense of injustice that whenever Hamilton now finds himself in the company of Evertonians, it is the only topic they want to talk about. The questions are always the same – how and why was his goal ruled out?

'I still can't give an answer,' said Hamilton. 'I just hope as Clive has gotten older he realises it was such a mistake. He said it was an infringement and left it at that but a couple of years earlier when I was playing for Ipswich against West Ham he ruled out a similar goal of mine. It was history repeating.'

The game itself was everything that everyone hopes today’s meeting will be. Packed with fantastic goals and played in the right spirit, Everton fought back from 1-0 and 2-1 down to stage a grandstand finish that should have propelled them to a Wembley date against Manchester United. 

'Liverpool were such a strong side and won the European Cup a month later,' said Hamilton. 

'But we were doing well, too. We'd just been to the League Cup final and the semi-final was a big moment in time. We felt if we could just win that match, things would snowball. We were the better side that day.'

That is a view with which former Liverpool captain Phil Neal concurs.

 

Goal? Hamilton (centre) raises his arms in celebration after beating Liverpool goalkeeper Ray Clemence - but it was disallowed

'Everton shook us with how well they played,' he recalled. 'Our dressing room was very quiet afterwards. It felt as if we had been beaten. If you look at my body language after Bryan has knocked the ball in, I turned away and just thought "goal". 

 

'As I was walking back to the centre circle, I realised, unexpectedly, that Mr Thomas had given us a second chance. He became bigger than the game itself.'

Neal would go on to score the opening goal in the replay at the same ground four days later, as Liverpool ran out comfortable 3-0 winners. 

Hamilton remembers Everton's chance of success disappearing the moment his goal was chalked off. 

 

'The ball had gone in off my hip from Ronny's cross,' he said. 'My immediate reaction was to look over at the linesman,' he said. 'But there was nothing from him. I then looked around at Joey Jones, Ray Clemence and Tommy Smith. The look on their faces said everything. I was ready to start celebrating. 

'The next thing I knew, Clive was pointing to where I was standing. I couldn’t believe it. He told me there had been an infringement. I asked him what it was but he never said anything else.

'We felt cheated. We had a place in the FA Cup final and it was ripped away from us. Everton became a hugely successful side in the 1980s but that success might have been accelerated had that goal stood. As it is, it will always be known as the goal that never was.'