charierre Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 The Daily Mirror are this morning that we are on the verge of selling Ivanovic to Juventus. Personally I'd have preferred Ben Haim to the one to make way but this could be the real reason why Alcides has been recalled? http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/200...89520-20632574/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea FC Champions Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 ummmm...correct me if im wrong but didn't we make a profit on Tiago, Kezman, Sidwell and perhaps Jarosik and Smertin?. Aren't we likely to now go on and make a profit with Pizarro and Ben Haim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mad_mac Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 Seems strange if this were to happen. Unless whatever the club has seen of him they don't think he'll be good enough. But Juventus are a big club, so he must be something if they are interested? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHedges Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 Seems strange if this were to happen. Unless whatever the club has seen of him they don't think he'll be good enough. But Juventus are a big club, so he must be something if they are interested? I could see a scenario in which is would make sense. Ivanovic was bought under Jose, and when Big Felipe came in with Bosingwa he was seen as surplus. I remember when he came people described him more as a RB than a CB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mad_mac Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 True Matt, however, if he is as versatie a player as he seems to be, then it seems strange to let him go? Also, if we are still meant to be bringing back Alcides, then it puzzles me even more. However, one thing that could be taken from this story, and this is merely me looking for the positive, is that this could mean Riccy is staying. If Riccy stays, then we have Alex as back up. If Riccy was going, we would play Terry and Alex, with Ivanovic as back up Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abramovich Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 I'd be upset if that were true. To let a young talented footballer with great upside go without playing him even once is ridiculous and sends a wrong message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizeH Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 ummmm...correct me if im wrong but didn't we make a profit on Tiago, Kezman, Sidwell and perhaps Jarosik and Smertin?. Aren't we likely to now go on and make a profit with Pizarro and Ben Haim? And Robben :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjd Posted July 6, 2008 Share Posted July 6, 2008 I could see a scenario in which is would make sense. Ivanovic was bought under Jose, and when Big Felipe came in with Bosingwa he was seen as surplus. I remember when he came people described him more as a RB than a CB. He came in Jan didnt he ? He was bought under Grunt. All very strange if he goes if you ask me. No one has seen him play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geezer Posted July 6, 2008 Share Posted July 6, 2008 All very strange if he goes if you ask me. No one has seen him play! Not even Graeme Souness? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essien's Strike Posted July 6, 2008 Share Posted July 6, 2008 techically we didnt actually make a profit on Tiago, he was part of the Essien deal though the swap wasnt simultaneous. but i think Kezman was the first profit making sale since Roman. Also, were making a tidy sum on Sidwell if he goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts