croydonblue

you watch the excuses they make for city at half time.

didn't you know the british love a loser, if your succesful like us you get taken to the cleaners!

citeh are getting ownnnnned

bye bye citeh

sightist.

w**kER ALERT!

This is really getting on my tits, these people in power will do anything to cling to it and anything to save face.

4.45pm just before knocking of time!

The fact that he has been given another top flight game to officiate next week is a joke, he should be reffing matches over hackney marshes, that's his level!

Agreed. always articulates his thoughts well

yes the refs assessor, assess's the refs performance, is paid for by.f.a and essentially grades the referee, but the f.a always supports the ref. mark halsey was on the radio yesterday, he of calum mcmanaman tackle fame, he apologised at half time for the tackle to alan pardew, and said he did not see it (the tackle) he told the f.a this, and could they retrospectively punish mcmanaman and they said "no the linesman saw it/was looking at it" mark halsey said to the f.a "but he was 70yards away" they said he still saw it. halsey was disgusted and retired soon after. and the assessor saturday said they was correct decisions all of them. so we are f**ked!

DO IT! go and sign in and say you've come to wish spurs all the luck in the world for sunday, your computer will crash from the abuse!

The worrying thing is that the refs assessor, agreed with the ref, that he got all four decisions right!

Go and sign into the floppy cock.Say that you are a chelsea fan come in peace, and watch the diatribe of abuse you get, if you think we are that bad!

The floppy cock a.k.a the fighting cock. maybe the scum have a thing about cocks!

you seriously need to get a grip, go on the west ham site and see what say about us or millwall, their ex-players thread is particularly nice. we are always going to get bad press. THE PRESS DO NOT LIKE US, have you not noticed that! jesus save me

What has it got to do with you what zola says to the burnley fan? who made you god? who made you the arbiter of everyone's moral and social conduct. i went on the floppy cock to point out a few historical inaccuracies, and i got dogs abuse, the burnley fan got of lightly let me tell you as do other fans that sign in here proffering stupid opinions. john terry is a hard but fair player, i have never seen him running around a pitch like a horrible little cu nnt trying to do other players, like barnes did constantly. There is the difference

I don't dislike burnley, and lots of people of people have got lost in the barnes incident alone, not the two gung fu kicks on zouma and ivan, that went unpunished, and the referee not being able to see two stonewall penalties. inept. That is what people most pundits and ex-refs have described it as. More worrying is the fact, that it is being reported in the press, that the f.a referee's assessor has concurred that the referee got all FOUR decisions correct. so this leaves us open to more inept refereeing moranity!

That wasn't meant to be directed at you, that was directed at cech hook, but you do like being offended on others peoples behalf don't you blue daze and jumping in the middle of other peoples argument's no wonder someone started a thread of your own, on how you were a condescending prick. stay out my arguments with other members. thank you!

well if it walks like a duck, and and it quacks like duck, chances are it's duck! As I've said you seem to be solely focused on matic costing us the 3 points, not as every man and his dog, apart from dippers, burnley fans and jamie redknapp. The totally inept impersonation of a referee, that had it been of even a risible standard, would have seen us 2-0 up at the point of matic's sending off. Had he given us 1 of 2 blatant penalties. Making matic's sending off a moot point. your view of this, is diametrically opposed to more less every chelsea supporter and non chelsea supporter in the country. this has to give rise to the question who in fact do you support. so no it's not question of "real fan bollocks" your stance is just a stance of one of the 10% of football supporters and media who think chelsea, were not in fact, hit over the head and relieved of their goods. that's robbed in time honored cliche. quack quack!

See cech hook is up up to his usual standard of bollocks, which is utter bollocks. The matic sending off is a side issue, by the time he was sent off, we should have been 3-0 up, so his sending off would have been inconsequential, had atkinson's refereeing not been of the standard of rowan atkinsons character, johnny english, and he had awarded penalties that ray charles could have seen. i just don't see how you claim to be a chelsea supporter, when your sole focus has been on matic losing his head and costing us the game, when in fact it was atkinson's inept impersonation of being a referee that cost us the game. one a blatant handball that he did not see from ten yards away and was staring straight at it. The mind boggles.

And not before time me thinks!

i don't think it will, i think it will make it fairer, all this sh*t about it evens itself out over the course of a season, it just needs the 4th official to be doing something other than saying don't come out your area, to managers, the fifth officials in the CL have done jack. they have missed incidents like Saturdays, five feet from them! and as i said earlier when things kick off like they do saturday, the 4th official has enough time to review it without stopping the game, all the ref has to say to the 4th official is, "what was your view of it, i missed it/was unsighted" i'm sure the refs would be in favour as they wouldn't want to seen as a halfwit!

To the west ham fan you need to f**k off back to dale farm!

nah it wasn't that bad ask sean dick, "it was the angle of rotation of the camera" whatever that means.