For the money needed to acquire, think till be too much of a risk.

 

We'll never know unless we tried of course.

I don't agree. He's a top prospect so why not? He can't be any worse than Cuadrado.

I don't agree. He's a top prospect so why not? He can't be any worse than Cuadrado.

 

Well he definitely cant be any worse than Cuadrado! Im not sure there is such a thing.

 

I think Pedro is a better option. Proven at the Top level, scores goals, and ultimately will be cheaper.

What makes you believe that Pedro is more suited to the Premier Lague than Griezmann?

 

I rate them both and i would love either of them at Chelsea, but Griezmann looks like the better fit. Pedro is more of a utility player.

Pedro has played well against English teams in the past. Notably scoring against United in Champs League Final. And he has done it over a number of years, where as AG has had only 1 season at the very top level.

 

As for being utility, I don't see it. he is a winger simple as that. It's griezmann that hasnt got a set position. Plays as a second striker, no10, wide player. I dont think this a bad thing though to be honest.

 

Not saying I don't rate Griezmann. But with the touted price tages (nearly double Pedros) and there respective records, the safer option for me is Pedro. Also note that we have a strong Spanish contingent in the squad at the moment, which will help.

Would have signed C Teves instead of Falcao, M Reus for Cuadrado, Witsel and V Enyeama instead of Begovic

 

Tevez clearly has a problem with living in England and there is nothing left for him to achieve over here so i think that signing him is pretty much impossible. Reus doesn't want to leave Dortmund and would cost us a lot of money. Begovic was needed or else we would have gone into the season without a back up goalkeeper.

Whatever happened to Florient Thauvin?

He was touted the next big thing but haven't heard much lately.