Hashishi

A) Who identified him and using what data? I have seen no data or sources which suggest he is chelsea level. Its like Boehly wanted a yes man after Tuchel and Potter was in 4th after 6 games. Potter isn't really building anything, I haven't seen a change similar to how Ten Hag has changed Manure. I guess time will tell. At least Tuchel was building towards something, even if it was 343 and not 443, and he had an imprint immediately, winning the UCL. He was a steal on a 18 month contract. B) Dude we can get Europa League for our B team to play next year. We could've been in for a shout for CL spots but Potter is hopeless. We could've had a run in the CL but again Potter is hopeless. I think any competent manager can still get us Europa or conference next year and maybe even turn the Dortmund leg around. C) It's usually a better idea to start winning and then start to think about long term stability. Madrid would never hire someone like Potter, all their managers are Tier 1 or Tier 2. Even if they sacked Ancelotti, they would probably turn to Tuchel. D) I don't think it's the fact we didn't want it, it just wasn't availible. The best manager availible was the one we sacked. E) If its the club expectations to languish in midtable for the next 5 years under Potter then I don't have patience for that. Every manager needs some time to convey his ideas, Potter has had that time. Ten Hag has come leaps and bounds in a relative amount of time.

I am of the opinion that even at Tuchels worst, it wasn't as bad as freefalling like we are now. Sure, he wasn't a world class manager but he was a solid in the tier just below that. Every team in the world, from PSG to Madrid, would clamour for Tuchel because, simply put, he is the best availible manager. I don't get these comparisons besmirching the good name of our UCL winning manager. It's kind of like in Animal Farm (George Orwell), when the pigs all blame the problems on snowball and use fake stats to try convince the animals that life is better than before under snowball. Very apt that book symbolises the end of the soviet union while a certain Russian left us last year too. The pigs liked making speeches about their f**king vision too. In his coaching career, Tuchel NEVER showed the form that Potter has shown these past few months. People blame him for sh*t buys but holy sh*t that was before I saw the donkeys that were signed in January. Sterling and Fofana are going to be important to us because we don't have a better RW (even though nick hate sterling runs like a duck) and Silva can't play every game so fofana is our 3rd best CB if Badman keeps 2nd. Cucu, KK and Auba were all sh*t buys. Not needed, too expensive and didn't work out. Cucu is the only one who can redeem himself but I don't see how he does that as a backup. KK is a good backup but they shouldn't be on 300k pw, at least he isnt for 8 years. Auba looks set to move on in summer. My initial thought on the January buys are a lot worse. Enzo is 80m max in his prime (unless football prices inflate even more and we sell him to Madrid for 200m). Felix - a shame that our most in form player is one on loan. I don't think we buy him, nkunku takes his place next year. Expensive loan as well but we needed him. Mudryk has nothing going for him apart from his pace and those little tricks he does, both of which lead to nothing. Massively overpaid for him. Badman was a steal, I really hope he keeps it up and doesn't regress, especially when Silva isn't there to keep him in line. So the main problem is overpaying for Enzo, Mudryk, Felix (Cucu, KK, Fofana and Auba) but now we get onto the real donkeys DDF and Madueke are not PL level footballers. Maybe they will go on loan and change all of that and prove us wrong like Salah and KDB. I doubt it though and feel they fail the eye test. So we are stuck with another 2 donkeyokos on perpetual loan for 8 years.

It's more like he told at the owners they know nothing about football and he didn't want ronaldo. They spent a sh*t tonne on dregs after sacking Buck, Marina and Cech so this was before we even had a recruitment team in place. It's not fair the way Tuchel was treated, in the same way its not fair the way Potter gets so much backing. The club has lost its identity and should have been transitioned instead by keeping the old guard at least for the summer window. I doubt Marina would've given KK 300k pw, it's like Todd just made offers and everyone bit his hand off. We will be paying for these decisions for the next 8 years or however long that donkey Maduekes contract is.

Are you Tomo on talk chelsea? You replied with exactly the same thing on there.

We have a fecking PE teacher as our manager. And it would be fine had his sidekick not been a PE Assistant/Geography teacher.

The problem is there are no world class managers availible atm. If carlo Ancelotti was free tomorrow I would be ecstatic but it's a shame that the most appealing option is Mou 3.0. I don't want Poch or Enrique anywhere near this club. They are specialists in failure and would've done something at Spurs/PSG and Barca/Spain if they were any good. I'm seriously afraid our best option is sticking with Potter.

We will never win anything with tweedle dee and tweedle dum stinking up the club.

Here's my two cents. Tuchel didn't want ronaldo or 443 so Todd hired Potter. When Todd says jump for 600m Potter says how high. He is a yes man who will do his best with what he is given. The problem is he has been given 600m and I'm afraid he won't get results. I'm even more afraid the board don't see this and keep him around. We will be languishing in midtable by Christmas if that is the case...