-
Realistic goals 2016/2017
Depends on signings. League should obviously be priority, but I don't think we'll end up anywhere near the top. What I really dislike is people saying that they'd rather avoid Europa League football altogether if it meant not getting near the top 5/6. EL win would give us a Champions League spot, and a trophy. Why would anyone want to deny us the chance at getting into a trophy? Realistically, I think we should be aiming for 4th/5th and winning one of the FA or League Cups. Anything else is a bonus. Long gone are the days of league dominance. Anyone can beat anyone.
-
Chelsea fined £375,000 for failing to control players against Tottenham
But it specifically mentions that this is Spurs 3rd time they've been charged in the same period. So the facts are: - Spurs received 7 (SEVEN) more yellows. - Spurs failed to receive a single red when 5 should have been sent off. - Spurs were the ones who initiated the mass brawls. - Pochettino invaded the pitch. - Spurs are also serial offenders. - One of the Spurs players has subsequently been banned for violent conduct. Why are we being fined more? It's clear, with documented proof, that the FA have a vendetta against Chelsea FC. Any logical person who takes off whatever coloured specs they have can see this. I'm sure even Spudulike can see this. Chelsea need to refuse to pay and take this to court and cite all the previous examples. It's extortion and outrageous discrimination.
-
Chelsea Vs Tottenham (PL) 02/05/2016 KO 20:00 GMT
But it specifically mentions that this is Spurs 3rd time they've been charged in the same period. So the facts are: - Spurs received 7 (SEVEN) more yellows. - Spurs failed to receive a single red when 5 should have been sent off. - Spurs were the ones who initiated the mass brawls. - Pochettino invaded the pitch. - Spurs are also serial offenders. - One of the Spurs players has subsequently been banned for violent conduct. Why are we being fined more? It's clear, with documented proof, that the FA have a vendetta against Chelsea FC. Any logical person who takes off whatever coloured specs they have can see this. I'm sure even Spudulike can see this. Chelsea need to refuse to pay and take this to court and cite all the previous examples. It's extortion and outrageous discrimination.
-
Chelsea Vs Tottenham (PL) 02/05/2016 KO 20:00 GMT
A Leicester draw or loss on the weekend would actually suit us better, as it means Tottenham will be forced to come out and attack. If Leicester end up winning the title at Old Trafford I'd be gutted because I want us to be the ones who ruin Tottenham's season. Ideal team: Courtois Dave -- Terry -- Cahill -- Rahman Matic -- Loftus-Cheek Willian -- Fabregas -- Hazard Costa
-
-
-
-
Andy Carroll
....scores again.
-
-
Bournemouth vs. Chelsea (PL) 23/04/2016 KO 15:00 BST
Quite a lot actually. Earlier on the season the odds were still heavily stacked in Chelsea's favour, especially when playing at home. Predicting a loss was easy money.
-
-
Bournemouth vs. Chelsea (PL) 23/04/2016 KO 15:00 BST
Everyone called me out as being too negative and pessimistic when saying we were going to lose at home to Bournemouth. Then we went and lost. We are awful. None of the players care. The fact that we have put in performances that rival Villa's this season tell you everything you need to know. We are capable of getting a result if we try, but we won't.
-
The John Obi Mikel Goal Scoring Thread
I wouldn't mind paying a club to take him off us. Maybe we can arrange a Torres, and ship him off to AC Milan on loan whilst paying his contract. Just don't let him anywhere near the first team.
-
Andy Carroll
You aren't actually providing evidence of anything. Messi does hit a lot of goals, but he's also in another league compared to any other player barring Ronaldo. Not trolling. No-one has given Andy Carroll a second thought because they can't bear to have someone of his 'calibre' at the club. I'm not advocating a huge bid, nor making him first choice. He would be an excellent late impact striker and back up. He won't cost so much and he's vastly experienced in the PL. He's English, he's home grown. His injuries seem to be behind him. He's in good form. Many would have argued against Costa being a part of this club because of his 'calibre' and reputation, yet he came here and tore the league up in his first season. No-one is suggesting Carroll will set the world on fire, but he has the ability to do exceptionally well at Chelsea and I would welcome him here over Traore, Remy, Falcao and Pato any day of the week.
-
Andy Carroll
I realise sarcasm is the lowest form of wit which is why you have to resort to it, but at least try and contribute something useful in future. Messi scores penalties, but that wouldn't be a determining factor on whether you should or shouldn't buy him. By the way, how are our penalty takers this season? Useless you say, well Carroll looks even more appealing now...
-
Bournemouth vs. Chelsea (PL) 23/04/2016 KO 15:00 BST
We'll lose this one for sure. Bournemouth will come out all guns blazing and are still trying to ensure PL survival even though that's highly likely now. We have: - Nothing to play for. - Players who don't care. - Clueless manager. - Injuries. Play an entire youth team except Loftus-Cheek who doesn't care. Bournemouth 3-0 Chelsea. One achievement we can have this season aside from PL survival is trying to keep our goal difference above 0.
-
We will decide who wins the Premier League.
We will lose both of them. I hope so. I can't see us picking up a single point before the season is out. The quicker the deadwood is taken out and Guus is gone the better.
-
Andy Carroll
Scored again. No justifiable reason why he shouldn't be looked at seriously to buy.
-
-
Chelsea vs Man City (PL) Sat 16th April, 17:30 GMT
Can't wait for Mikel to be sold. Worse than Ramires.
-
Chelsea vs Man City (PL) Sat 16th April, 17:30 GMT
Every single match of my accumulator has come in today, but I cashed out early annoyingly. I originally bet on a City win, so I'll take a Chelsea win so I don't feel so bad.