Lane

i have never seen muller diving

arshavin had a great tournament last time and hes a joke of a player

well he said he may leave this summer. it couldve been just an attempt to get more playing time but you never know

you wont see any flashes of brilliance with him, but he is a great athlete. one of those guys that would basically be great in any sport they try. reasonably fast, strong, tall, solid stamina, good vertical and all that coupled with solid technique. i dont think he has any holes in his game i also think he has great mental characteristics, he keeps his chin up, keeps pushing even when losing

i would rather repair the weak links in my team before i strengthen the strong ones even more their fullbacks and midfield are poor and i doubt they have money to burn, but to me buying lewandowski and kagawa both, is burning money kagawa, rooney and lewandowski can play in some sort of diamond, but that formation hasnt been used in a while (in europe at least)

^^fuk 'em. seriously. 65M is a fukin joke

ok then, lewandowski, kagawa, rooney, and 2 wingers as starters. cant wait to see how that will work

theyre piling on strikers while their fullbacks and midfield are shyte. forgive me if im not bothered one bit lewandowski, chicha and rooney for 1 position . . .

40 million pounds is just too much for my taste. i would ditch hulk and pursue muller instead, maybe it would make porto reconsider their demands

id rather have fellaini

---------------Cech--------------- Ivanovic----Cahill------Luiz---------Cole ----------Fellaini----Ramires------------- Muller------------Mata-------------Hazard -------------------Torres--------------------

well the way i see it, it would be hulk or muller, not both of them. muller would be a better solution IMO, both for financial and football reasons

i think the reason mata was so great as our nr 10 was because he was the only creative outlet. pushing him out to the wing was a bad idea simply because there was no one to play behind the striker he was great for valencia on the wing and IMO he could (and did) do a great job for as out wide

if we get him instead of hulk id still be pleased. maybe im even leaning towards muller over hulk. he works harder, he is younger and better in the air than hulk.

all i know there wasnt a single quote to support that. there are in fact, quotes of him saying he will play wherever the manager tells him. i find that whole thing to be completely fabricated by the media i disagree with alves being better than ivan, but even if he was both alves and lahm arent for sale. so why should we bench/sell ivan if we cant get a better player instead? are we a feeder club?

how come rb isnt his natural position when he spent the majority of his career as a rb? he was a rb in moscow, in the national squad and in chelsea. he is a right back and tell me who are these rbs that are better than ivan? he was statistically the best rb in england and people want to bench him. idiotic

selling one of our best players? what are we, arsenal?

im calling him azar, rolling 'r' and everything!

lets look back at this peach of an article http://www.ourkop.com/2011/07/14/why-stewart-downing-is-a-better-signing-than-juan-mata/2/

well its pronounced azar. i have no issue with commentators trying to pronounce names the way they should be pronounced whats next, saying eye-one-oh-wick (ivanovic) just because thats the way a text-to-speech program wouldve read it?

he did aspire to play for us, and i dont blame him for considering man utd he didnt grow up in england, he most likely has no particular feelings about any club, he just wants to advance his career you are giving it too much thought, no need to put every word of his under a microscope

im glad football shirts dont look like wizard robes anymore. tight shirts look miles better IMO

youre meaning to tell me hes not a chelsea fan since birth?! scandalous!! im on my way there to rip that contract to shreds

i have no doubt mata and hazard will drift all over the pitch

is this line up a joke?