Don't get me wrong, I'm all for statistics, but they have to be used with context and an understanding of what the data is telling you. In this case the information conveyed is entirely useless, because it implies that the only thing that matters in a game of football is a goal scored. To assess the INFLUENCE of English players on the overall outcome of a match would be a better way of creating a discussion on the use of English players within teams in the Premier League, although admittedly it would be a great deal more difficult to do.
I'm only going to take into account Liverpool, Man City and ourselves for the sake of this argument but it can be applied for all teams.
Firstly, this data is skewed by penalty takers. For example, as first choice penalty taker for Liverpool this season Gerrard scored 10 goals from penalties. Compare that to Chelsea, who had a single penalty scored by Lampard this season, and 4 from Hazard. I would argue that the identity of the player scoring the penalty does not have a large amount of influence over the outcome of the penalty itself and for example, Suarez would just as likely scored than Gerrard. The ability get into the position to win the penalty in this case is not taken into account, but is arguably ore important. (Based on Premier League 2002/03-2012/13 79.25% penalties scored, citation needed). Perhaps not the best argument but relevant all the same.
More importantly, especially in Chelsea's case, it does not take into account the importance of the influence English players on a match without having scored. Our first choice center-back partnering was Terry and Cahill for large parts of the season. This pairing, although not vital to our goal scoring prowess, were fundamental to our successes this season as the team with the best defensive record (least goals conceded). In other words, these two ENGLISH players undoubtedly had a huge amount of influence on some tight games and probably, though it is hard to quantify, had a big say in a number of results. Something that is completely disregarded by the information in that table.
Similarly Joe Hart, as the first choice goalkeeper at Manchester City, was a part of the second best defensive in the league. His 13 clean sheets this season would have played a big part in their second Premier League title, but is entirely ignored with a table of goals.
But I suppose it's a table that puts darling Liverpool at the top, which is apparently what everyone in the world wants to see. Top journalism, give the people what they want to hear.
I'm not saying that the inclusion of English players isn't a growing concern of mine when it comes to our own squad, especially with the likely departure of Terry, Lampard and Cole within the next couple of seasons, and it is something I hope is addressed at both a club level and more generally in the Premier League to ensure that some of our English lads get a go at the top level, but as a lover (its more love-hate really) of mathematics it annoys me to see things like this.
Apologies for the rant.