What, what, what. Pimms O'clock and our new "best friend" Rap Scallion espouses his whimsical musings on our own favourite forum without having the common decency to reveal his own lineage. Ye gads. Martha, fetch the elephant gun. No backbone these fuzzy wuzzys.

So let's have a fun guessing game

I think he's a rare specimen, a Cocksure y*d*o.

Not seen since the 80's but a particularly unpleasant creature.

Since this particular rapscallion has had a spectacularly short lifetime on the forum, speculation is perhaps pointless.

However.... could he be an incarnation of Brian M? Sufficiently self-opinionated perhaps, but deficient in references to his own sexual prowess. Though to be fair he wasn't given much time to develop.

No definitely a Scouse. Probably one who's previously been banned from here. Definitely someone too chickensh*t to admit who and what they really are, and stupid enough to believe that people here won't see through his pathetic pseudo-intellectual drivel.

Far too articulate for a scouse. How about one Adrian Durham? B)

Since this particular rapscallion has had a spectacularly short lifetime on the forum, speculation is perhaps pointless.

However.... could he be an incarnation of Brian M? Sufficiently self-opinionated perhaps, but deficient in references to his own sexual prowess. Though to be fair he wasn't given much time to develop.

But I thought you were Brian M?

Could the Rap Scallion blighter be French? Damn his eyes.

But I thought you were Brian M?

Could the Rap Scallion blighter be French? Damn his eyes.

FARK!!!! I've been chatting up a gay f**king pirate?????

But I thought you were Brian M?

Could the Rap Scallion blighter be French? Damn his eyes.

You thought MOI was Brian M?? How could you! I am mortified! I could not be more mortified if you rolled me in sausage meat and cooked me on the barbecue.

Where's the mortified emoticon when you want it? B)

FARK!!!! I've been chatting up a gay f**king pirate?????

No No my leetle Eenglish cabbage, je suis a merry beachfille, not a gai pirate. But the f**king bit ees OK.

FARK!!!! I've been chatting up a gay f**king pirate?????

Elementary deduction my dear Geezer. Had you not noticed Moi and The Gay Pirate display the same pendantry for grammer, punctuation, flirtatousness and verbosity?

But to more pressing issues my dear friend and our nemesis Rap Scallion. Could he be Sepp Fatter? A Ronaldoless Manc? or a Man "we're gonna rule da world" Titty fan?

A rapscallion is one who is playfully mischievous or a scoundrel. Rapscallion comes from the now-obsolete word "rascallion" meaning rascal. It is possible that the contemporary pejorative word for a vandal or youth who perpetrates antisocial behavior (such as petty theft, graffiti, or harassment) "Scally" is derived from "Rapscallion." "Scally" is a common term for such individuals in the United Kingdom and Australia, but does not feature in American English

Not sure who he is, but I agree with Geezer - he's far too articulate to be a scouser.

Just noticed he's now banned which seems VERY harsh. Why? I can think of plenty of others in the past who haven't been banned for a LOT worse.

Elementary deduction my dear Geezer. Had you not noticed Moi and The Gay Pirate display the same pendantry for grammer, punctuation, flirtatousness and verbosity?

1. Pedantry

2. Grammar

3. Flirtatiousness

Brian M. did have some good points!

I am NOT verbose - or at least, only when I am taking the piss!

Now I'm cross! B)

Edited September 6, 200916 yr by moi

Elementary deduction my dear Geezer. Had you not noticed Moi and The Gay Pirate display the same pendantry for grammer, punctuation, flirtatousness and verbosity?

But to more pressing issues my dear friend and our nemesis Rap Scallion. Could he be Sepp Fatter? A Ronaldoless Manc? or a Man "we're gonna rule da world" Titty fan?

Sad to say we may never know. Maybe one of the mods could give a clue about what part of the world they were logging in from. If it was Surrey we know it's a Ronaldoless manc, if it's Manchester it's a titeh fan, if it's Liverpool it's someone who is clearly having their postings written for them by someone else. Can't be Blatter cos there's no reference to slaves. It's not Platinin cos he hasn't tipped his beret and garlic breath in my direction. Nope, it's one of lifes little mysteries.

Not sure who he is, but I agree with Geezer - he's far too articulate to be a scouser.

Just noticed he's now banned which seems VERY harsh. Why? I can think of plenty of others in the past who haven't been banned for a LOT worse.

I disagree on both counts. Firstly he's only pseudo articulate, also pseudo intelligent, pseudo intellectual and so on.

Secondly. What he actually did was use one of my posts, perhaps random, I believe not - in a pitiful attempt to stir up an argument. And to me this is all very reminiscent of that El Nino character I mentioned in the other thread. Another Scouse git who thought he was clever, and who chose to make things personal. As I stated elsewhere, he demanded that I stick to football only reasons for disliking Scousers, and followed this up with a list of quotes which he said were from messages sent to him in support of his stance, and all massively derogative towards me.

I said then that if there were any truth in those "quotes" of his, then I'm on the wrong forum, and it's as true now as it was then. I might be wrong, it could be someone else entirely, but there was something in the way this twat quoted and replied to me that reminded me of El Nino, never mind the sh*t-stirring, the pitiful attempt to turn members of this forum against each other.

1. Pedantry

2. Grammar

3. Flirtatiousness

Brian M. did have some good points!

I am NOT verbose - or at least, only when I am taking the piss!

Now I'm cross! B)

Watson. I rest my case!

How's it going with the old sports captaincy thing Brian?

1. Pedantry

2. Grammar

3. Flirtatiousness

Brian M. did have some good points!

I am NOT verbose - or at least, only when I am taking the piss!

Now I'm cross! B)

Calmez vers le bas mon cherie. Rêve d'île d'imagination

Calmez vers le bas mon cherie. Rêve d'île d'imagination

Tu as raison, mon trésor. I will continue to dream. But if you persist in calling me MON chérie instead of MA chérie, Just will be convinced I'm the aforementioned gay pirate.

Tu as raison, mon trésor. I will continue to dream. But if you persist in calling me MON chérie instead of MA chérie, Just will be convinced I'm the aforementioned gay pirate.

Buggar that babelfish!!

To support my argument about the twat in the hat, here is my second reply to Blue Sun Tzu, which the self-same twat in or out of the exact same hat, chose to ignore entirely:

No I don't believe we're necessarily 100% innocent, but I do think you're jumping the gun here.

Take Arnesen, and even more so Kenyon out of the argument, because it's far to easy to fall into the trap, justified or otherwise, of blaming Kenyon for everything.

We don't know what happened, but I do believe that we are being made an example of. As other posters have stated, if the ban is upheld, and similar penalties are handed out for similar offences to everyone from the Arse to Real Madrid, then all well and good. Because if we're guilty, then you can bet your life so are the rest of them. One major problem here is the lack of clarity. We've apparently broken French regulations, not laws, but regulations, that do not apply in other countries.

Worst case scenario: the ban is upheld, players leave without any means to replace them - which is what Arjen Robben is suggesting will happen.

Best case: the ban is reduced to a single transfer window, a few of our youngsters make full use of the opportunity and go on to become established first team regulars. Kenyon gets the boot.

In all honesty I don't know enough about Arnesen's involvement, or in this particular situation, Kenyon's either. But by any standards, seeing the back of Kenyon gone has got to be a good thing. I think this is something we can all agree with.

Here is the first line of Blue Sun Tzu's reply to this post:

For the record, I agree with everything you posted above

And out of that, the twat in the hat attempted to invent an argument between myself and Blue Sun Tzu. Get where I'm coming from?

Good reasoning by Lofty to feel that it could be El Nino, but to be honest I think it was a jounralist trying to get more fuel for the anti-Chelsea fire. I find it funny that whomever this person was, they completely ignored the fact that our Lawyers are "supremely" confident in having the decision reversed, as there is a letter from his parents, and we ran it by UEFA who gave us the go ahead.

Far too intellectual, or pseudo intellectual, to be a scouser

Scott

sh*t, he banned already? :D

What did he do?

sh*t, he banned already? :D

What did he do?

he seemed to be trying to build some kind of argument between lofty and blue sun tzu, not sure why though. guesses so far is he was brian m (cant be, he didnt tell us all about his sports exploits and how he was the bestest ever at his school), el nino (dont think thats it either, he was far too articulate to be that numpty). myself i think he was just some random tosser on the wind up and were giving him far too much air time.

With my serious head on now, generally I don't mind anyone coming on and having a pop. A lot of it I ignore anyway because it's puerile nonsense written by idiots simpy on a wind-up, (stand up Mr Rap Scallion). But occaisionally someone makes a good argument and it can be interesting reading. The fella from Barcelona last season is a good example.

Personally, what I do object to is people coming on here, having their say, but then not revealing what their own allegiances or motives are. It smacks of cowardice. And normally it's because they are frightend of having their own arguments and logic applied against their own clubs.

With my serious head on now, generally I don't mind anyone coming on and having a pop. A lot of it I ignore anyway because it's puerile nonsense written by idiots simpy on a wind-up, (stand up Mr Rap Scallion). But occaisionally someone makes a good argument and it can be interesting reading. The fella from Barcelona last season is a good example.

Personally, what I do object to is people coming on here, having their say, but then not revealing what their own allegiances or motives are. It smacks of cowardice. And normally it's because they are frightend of having their own arguments and logic applied against their own clubs.

fully agree, this one was obviously gutless and cowardly as he didnt even have the balls to tell us his own allegiances. theres been a few good uns on here, the lad from blackburns always good, and i remember a fenerbache (i think it was them anyway) fan being very good. and ill grudgingly acknowledge bluemoon too i suppose...... :D

Edited September 6, 200916 yr by dkw