2 hours ago, TheCeleryKing said:

Not Tosh.

Is so.

2 hours ago, Valerie said:

And England aren't good enough.

Aren't good enough for what? To win the World cup? No they were not good enough to win the World Cup. But they should have beaten a very ordinary and not great Argentina side. All is moot and what happened . .. well it happened

56 minutes ago, dermott said:

Is so.

Pffffttt

s'not.

2 hours ago, Scott Harris said:

"It's a matter of their nationality and we respect it"

f**k off, twat.

The blokes a complete bell end. Changes the rules to suit as far as I can see. And he looks like The Hood from Thunderbirds. "Calling International Rescue"

1 hour ago, TheCeleryKing said:

Pffffttt

s'not.

Is! So there!

1 hour ago, TheCeleryKing said:

Aren't good enough for what? To win the World cup? No they were not good enough to win the World Cup. But they should have beaten a very ordinary and not great Argentina side. All is moot and what happened . .. well it happened

Clearly not good enough to beat Argentina. Even if England had beaten a much more wiley and clever Argentina, I would not have put a single penny on them beating Spain in the final. England haven't been worth a cheeky punt to win the World Cup for ages. As someone said earlier (sorry, can't remember who), England are theTottenham Hotspur of international tournaments.

But.. it's the Euros in 2 years' time, time enough to gather new hope!