Jump to content

why 4 years


lauren

Recommended Posts

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.
because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

Wasn’t he already under contract as a paper shifter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think Grant would probably have no problem getting another job on the back of his record at Chelsea. Probably not at a big club like Chelsea, but QPR would likely jump at him now.

Qaz - May I ask why you think this is only a probability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

Probably for the same reason that we signed Kezman, Malouda, Sheva, SWP, . . .

Need I go on with the list of flops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

Probably so he gets a big pay day when he gets sacked or whatever, he is Romans friend afterall..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Well, this is awkward!

awkward the office GIF

The Shed End Forum relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible without pop ups, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online and continue to keep the forum up, as over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this domain by switching it off. Some of the advert banners can actually be closed to avoid interferance of your experience on The Shed End.

Cheers now!

emma watson yes GIF

Alright already, It's off!