anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

Yep.

I think Grant would probably have no problem getting another job on the back of his record at Chelsea. Probably not at a big club like Chelsea, but QPR would likely jump at him now.

I think Grant would probably have no problem getting another job on the back of his record at Chelsea. Probably not at a big club like Chelsea, but QPR would likely jump at him now.

I'd imagine most people would jump at him - especially if he crept up behind you on a dark night!

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

because we won't sack him, Lauren. We will just move him into another position within the club. therefore, if he doesn't like it, he'll forfeit his contract, and cost the club nothing. But I doubt anyone else will pick him up. QPR turned him down FFS

Wasn’t he already under contract as a paper shifter?

I think Grant would probably have no problem getting another job on the back of his record at Chelsea. Probably not at a big club like Chelsea, but QPR would likely jump at him now.

Qaz - May I ask why you think this is only a probability?

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

Probably for the same reason that we signed Kezman, Malouda, Sheva, SWP, . . .

Need I go on with the list of flops.

anyone got an explanation as to why Chelsea gave Grant a 4 year contract? This makes no sense from a business point of view. It will cost millions to sack him and whether or not RA is loaded it's a piss poor decision.

Probably so he gets a big pay day when he gets sacked or whatever, he is Romans friend afterall..