2 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

It's funny how triggered you are, just because someone has a different opinion to you, try making some valid points. 

Can we all just collectively avoid replying to these desperate posts of his? We could go through the tactical minutiae of how Conte would use Lukaku or point out how Cesc is also 'not a Conte kind of player' but he's not going to relent with this rhetoric.  

 Cesc isn't a Conte type player. You sure? 

2 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

It's funny how triggered you are, just because someone has a different opinion to you, try making some valid points. 

Can we all just collectively avoid replying to these desperate posts of his? We could go through the tactical minutiae of how Conte would use Lukaku or point out how Cesc is also 'not a Conte kind of player' but he's not going to relent with this rhetoric.  

I have used the ignore function but it still shows replies quoting his drivel 

6 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

 Cesc isn't a Conte type player. You sure? 

"It's not easy what happened to me - many people told me I'm not the type of player for Antonio, told me I should leave but I like challenges and this was a big challenge."

Do you need links to all the stories and rumors too or can you google them yourself? If you want to take this over to the Fabregas thread, let's

Edited May 12, 20179 yr by TheChelseaBlues

26 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

Show me examples of this. I'll wait.

I will when you show me quotes and stats to back up that original fact you posted. If you can't just admit it and apologise. 

 

Until then, i'll wait. x

 

Better yet, keep avoiding everything. I'm sure that will help.

Edited May 12, 20179 yr by RIP Mourinho

1 minute ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

"It's not easy what happened to me - many people told me I'm not the type of player for Antonio, told me I should leave but I like challenges and this was a big challenge."

Do you need links to all the stories and rumors too or can you google them yourself? If you want to take this over to the Fabregas thread, let's

And how does that quote prove Fabregas isn't a Conte type player exactly? 

the system isn't perfectly suited for Cesc, you are aware of this aren't you? 

1 minute ago, RIP Mourinho said:

I will when you show me quotes and stats to back up that original fact you posted. If you can't just admit it and apologise. 

 

Until then, i'll wait. x

 

Better yet, keep avoiding everything. I'm sure that will help.

Just like the other 2 fanboys you can't back up your accusation! Where have you been? Searching for examples but couldn't find any!   Oh dear, well this is awkward.

 

2 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

And how does that quote prove Fabregas isn't a Conte type player exactly? 

the system isn't perfectly suited for Cesc, you are aware of this aren't you? 

Let's take this real slow, how does one prove someone is not a Conte type of player? BTW you just admitted the system we play isn't suited for Cesc.... proof enough?

Edited May 12, 20179 yr by TheChelseaBlues

Just now, pacquiao said:

Just like the other 2 fanboys you can't back up your accusation! Where have you been? Searching for examples but couldn't find any!   Oh dear, well this is awkward.

 

You do know what irony is don't you?

 

Or are you just doing a really good job of rustling. Gs rustle bro!!

Just now, TheChelseaBlues said:

Let's take this real slow, how does one prove someone is not a Conte type of player? 

You can do it by basing it on Conte's quotes, like the fact he has said he likes warriors and talented players who work hard, and by looking at similar types of players who have worked under Conte and whether they have been successful under him. 

4 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

You do know what irony is don't you?

 

Or are you just doing a really good job of rustling. Gs rustle bro!!

Tick tock 

17 hours ago, pacquiao said:

Oh dear, you still upset because I speak the truth about your idol, you have an unhealthy obsession with such a mediocre player, the fact you actually think someone who doesn't rate Lukaku must have some sort of grudge against him as there is no other reason to not rate him is hilarious. 

But fact is Lukaku is never going to make it at Chelsea simply not good enough, but you keep living in your dreamland if it makes you happy. 

Hi pal, any update on this? A rough ETA on when you might be able to apologise or retract this? Wouldn't want people thinking you're a hypocrite. Thanks pal, get back to me x

1 minute ago, pacquiao said:

You can do it by basing it on Conte's quotes, like the fact he has said he likes warriors and talented players who work hard, and by looking at similar types of players who have worked under Conte and whether they have been successful under him. 

So anyone who is talented and works hard is a Conte kind of player, gotcha. So would you say that's 50% of professional players in the world? Talented and hard working, plus the 'warriors' so that's a hefty chunk more. Conte casts a wide net eh?

14 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

Hi pal, any update on this? A rough ETA on when you might be able to apologise or retract this? Wouldn't want people thinking you're a hypocrite. Thanks pal, get back to me x

the fact (of the matter) is - definition and synonyms

Used for emphasizing what you think is the true situation or the most important point

The fact is, he lost because he didn’t try very hard.

Nice try though. 

55 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

All you do on this thread and most threads is ignore every fact made by others and just repeat 'back that up'. When the same is done to you, you get defensive as you have just proven 

Still waiting for you to back this accusation up. 

Edited May 12, 20179 yr by pacquiao

2 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

the fact (of the matter) is - definition and synonyms

Used for emphasizing what you think is the truesituation or the most important point

The fact is, he lost because he didn’t try very hard.

Nice try though. 

Still waiting for you to back this accusation up. 

fact

fakt/

noun

 

1. a thing that is known or proved to be true.

    

   The comment you made is neither known nor proved to be true. As soon as you prove said fact or retract it i will answer any of your questions. This is why no one takes you seriously, you moan about one thing and then do the exact thing you hate. You've moaned numerous times on this thread alone about people not backing up their statements yet you have refused to do it. 

1 minute ago, RIP Mourinho said:

fact

fakt/

noun

 

1. a thing that is known or proved to be true.

    

   The comment you made is neither known nor proved to be true. As soon as you prove said fact or retract it i will answer any of your questions. This is why no one takes you seriously, you moan about one thing and then do the exact thing you hate. You've moaned numerous times on this thread alone about people not backing up their statements yet you have refused to do it. 

I think you need to go back and read my previous post. 

And understand the context.

Just now, pacquiao said:

I think you need to go back and read my previous post. 

And understand the context.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/the-fact-of-the-matter

Here is a link to the definition of the phrase 'fact of the matter' (even though you didn't use that but i'll play along). Read the first line, TRUTH. What truth is there in the statement you made? Absolutely none, thus an opinion and not a fact.

4 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/the-fact-of-the-matter

Here is a link to the definition of the phrase 'fact of the matter' (even though you didn't use that but i'll play along). Read the first line, TRUTH. What truth is there in the statement you made? Absolutely none, thus an opinion and not a fact.

Pretty sure I didn't say 'fact of the matter'

i said 'fact is'

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/the-fact-is

aa I said nice try though. 

5 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

Pretty sure I didn't say 'fact of the matter'

i said 'fact is'

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/the-fact-is

aa I said nice try though. 

So can you back it up then that he'll fail at Chelsea?

2 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

So can you back it up then that he'll fail at Chelsea?

He already has hasn't he? 

1 minute ago, pacquiao said:

He already has hasn't he? 

Nope. 

3 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

Nope. 

Unless he's delusional enough to equate being sold with failing

3 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

Unless he's delusional enough to equate being sold with failing

I think 400 minutes over 15 games as an 18/19 year old followed by numerous highly successful season must equate to failure somehow. 

4 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

Unless he's delusional enough to equate being sold with failing

So now Lukaku didn't fail at Chelsea! You can't make this stuff up! 

4 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

I think 400 minutes over 15 games as an 18/19 year old followed by numerous highly successful season must equate to failure somehow. 

Numerous highly successful seasons? We're they with Chelsea by any chance? Thought not.

And to answer your question yes of course I can back up the fact I believe Lukaku will fail again at Chelsea 

And im still waiting for you to back up your accusation btw 

Edited May 12, 20179 yr by pacquiao

2 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

So now Lukaku didn't fail at Chelsea! You can't make this stuff up! 

How did he fail exactly? He played 400 minutes in 15 games then sold off by our power hungry manager at the time. Did Mata fail at Chelsea? He was sold around the same time and i seem to remember him not being too bad of a player..