Just now, pacquiao said:

Show me these fans who said Pedro's first half was horrendous? 

What does it mean when they say pedro should be subbed off?

2 minutes ago, didierforever said:

What does it mean when they say pedro should be subbed off?

It means they are frustrated by the first half performance like I was and wanted to see if a sub could make a difference, that's how football fans are, wherever any team doesn't play well in the 1st half they want changes immediately, I don't think anyone played particularly well in that first half but to say Pedro was horrendous is simply ridiculous.

Just now, pacquiao said:

It means they are frustrated by the first half performance like I was and wanted to see if a sub could make a difference, that's how football fans are, wherever any team doesn't play well in the 1st half they want changes immediately, I don't think anyone played particularly well in that first half but to say Pedro was horrendous is simply ridiculous.

We had 10 other players. Yet so MANY fans single out PEDRO. Hmmm. Oh well. And you wanted me to use "common sense", a few posts ago. 

2 minutes ago, didierforever said:

We had 10 other players. Yet so MANY fans single out PEDRO. Hmmm. Oh well. And you wanted me to use "common sense", a few posts ago. 

And yet the man who knows best kept Pedro on. Yes please do use some common sense. 

3 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

And yet the man who knows best kept Pedro on. Yes please do use some common sense. 

Hahahah. Shifting goal posts? So now Pedro's performance is to be judged by Conte keeping him on the pitch? 

Yes Conte trusted Pedro, and pedro paid off that belief.

Yet Jose kept Ivanovic on the field right to the moment he got the sack, and he knew Iva the best. Should I use common sense there too? 

Just because Conte kept Pedro on the field, does not mean he was HORRENDOUS for the 1st half.

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by didierforever

Just now, didierforever said:

Hahahah. Shifting goal posts? 

Yes Conte trusted Pedro, and pedro paid off that belief.

Yet Jose kept Ivanovic on the field right to the moment he got the sack, and he knew Iva the best. Should I use common sense there too? 

Just because Conte kept Pedro on the field, does not mean he was HORRENDOUS for the 1st half.

Conte knows best, simple as that, showing me a few frustrated fans posts mean nothing, if you have eyes and understand football you can see Pedro was far from horrendous which is why no one else said he was horrendous only you, you have clearly had to suffer all season seeing him keep Willian out the team, and make you eat your words. 

If you want to understand what horrendous is go and watch some of Lukaku's performances against top teams down the years, then you will see what horrendous is. 

2 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

Conte knows best, simple as that, showing me a few frustrated fans posts mean nothing, if you have eyes and understand football you can see Pedro was far from horrendous which is why no one else said he was horrendous only you, you have clearly had to suffer all season seeing him keep Willian out the team, and make you eat your words. 

If you want to understand what horrendous is go and watch some of Lukaku's performances against top teams down the years, then you will see what horrendous is. 

Hahahahhaha... Comedy gold!!!! So now every time a manager does not make a substitute at HT, it means none of the players had a poor half, everything was hunky-dory. Again, people wanted him to be subbed off at HT, what the hell does that mean?? Or do you mean to say that just because no one used the exact word means that gist of what I am saying is wrong. Seems fair. 

Willian has played about 1800 minutes, while Pedro has played 2500. Thats hardly keeping out the whole. Both have their strengths. Willian is a better ball carrier, defensively way better, better set piece taker but pedro is a great goal scorer and makes those dangerous runs. With Hazard providing the creativity, we needed someone to make runs and pedro has done that, and kudos to him. But if we go into the next season makig the same mistake as the last one and again relying so heavily on hazard, then we are just making the same mistakes

As for Lukaku, well, lets hope you wont have the same sentiment as its very likely that he will be leading our line next season. :)

6 minutes ago, didierforever said:

Hahahahhaha... Comedy gold!!!! So now every time a manager does not make a substitute at HT, it means none of the players had a poor half, everything was hunky-dory. Again, people wanted him to be subbed off at HT, what the hell does that mean?? Or do you mean to say that just because no one used the exact word means that gist of what I am saying is wrong. Seems fair. 

Willian has played about 1800 minutes, while Pedro has played 2500. Thats hardly keeping out the whole. Both have their strengths. Willian is a better ball carrier, defensively way better, better set piece taker but pedro is a great goal scorer and makes those dangerous runs. With Hazard providing the creativity, we needed someone to make runs and pedro has done that, and kudos to him. But if we go into the next season makig the same mistake as the last one and again relying so heavily on hazard, then we are just making the same mistakes

As for Lukaku, well, lets hope you wont have the same sentiment as its very likely that he will be leading our line next season. :)

No, I think having a poor half is very different to having an horrendous half and anyway I'm not going to continue with this as it's pointless, there is no reasoning with you.

and you are in a dreamland if you think it's very likely Lukaku will be leading our attack next season! 

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by pacquiao

Just now, pacquiao said:

No, I think having a poor half is very different to having an horrendous half and anyway I'm not going to continue with this as it's pointless, there is no reasoning with you.

and you are in a dreamland if you think it's very likely Lukaku will be leading our attack next season! 

The only person seems to be in dreamland (or denial) is you my mate. How many people have tried to reason it off with you on multiple thread. So please dont try to pawn off being unreasonable on me. Also how "poor" does a player have to be, that fans (none of them being me) want him to get subbed off? Hmmm. 

4 minutes ago, didierforever said:

The only person seems to be in dreamland (or denial) is you my mate. How many people have tried to reason it off with you on multiple thread. So please dont try to pawn off being unreasonable on me. Also how "poor" does a player have to be, that fans (none of them being me) want him to get subbed off? Hmmm. 

There are many who have tried to reason with him. Unsuccessfully. 

4 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

There are many who have tried to reason with him. Unsuccessfully. 

Show me examples of this then

and I'm still waiting for that proof btw about Conte and his quotes on Costa. 

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by pacquiao

7 minutes ago, didierforever said:

The only person seems to be in dreamland (or denial) is you my mate. How many people have tried to reason it off with you on multiple thread. So please dont try to pawn off being unreasonable on me. Also how "poor" does a player have to be, that fans (none of them being me) want him to get subbed off? Hmmm. 

More lies.  

and I already explained to you, but clealry as I said there is no reasoning or common sense with you 

4 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

There are many who have tried to reason with him. Unsuccessfully. 

I tag you mate. Wanna give it a try, because honestly I am out. "More lies". I mean, its good to have an "opinion", but this is just insane.

8 minutes ago, didierforever said:

The only person seems to be in dreamland (or denial) is you my mate. How many people have tried to reason it off with you on multiple thread. So please dont try to pawn off being unreasonable on me. Also how "poor" does a player have to be, that fans (none of them being me) want him to get subbed off? Hmmm. 

There are several people on just this thread alone that have tried with him, and now he is trying to draw me in, again. Not going to happen, I wasted a few hours with him the other day. It is like talking with multiple personalties. One poster, not sure of his name atm, stated @pacquiao is a troll.

4 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

There are several people on just this thread alone that have tried with him, and now he is trying to draw me in, again. Not going to happen, I wasted a few hours with him the other day. It is like talking with multiple personalties. One poster, not sure of his name atm, stated @pacquiao is a troll.

So once again you can't back you what you say, you make up lies and then can't back it up, if anyone is a troll you are proving it's you.

and btw I'm still waiting for you to show me that proof. 

2 minutes ago, didierforever said:

*I tag you mate. Wanna give it a try, because honestly I am out. "More lies". **I mean, its good to have an "opinion", but this is just insane.

*Nah, I'm all out mate, I'd rather have brain surgery. 

**Everyone has an opinion, but as you correctly say, it's insane with him. If you don't agree with his opinion or catch him out he just throws his dummy out the pram.

6 minutes ago, didierforever said:

I tag you mate. Wanna give it a try, because honestly I am out. "More lies". I mean, its good to have an "opinion", but this is just insane.

Show me these multiple threads, where people have tried to apparently reason with me, you are well known from TalkCheslea as making up these sort of lies, see you still haven't grown up.

4 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

*Nah, I'm all out mate, I'd rather have brain surgery. 

**Everyone has an opinion, but as you correctly say, it's insane with him. If you don't agree with his opinion or catch him out he just throws his dummy out the pram.

Ya. I feel like having one right now. 

2 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

*Nah, I'm all out mate, I'd rather have brain surgery. 

**Everyone has an opinion, but as you correctly say, it's insane with him. If you don't agree with his opinion or catch him out he just throws his dummy out the pram.

So you got caught out by me the other day and couldn't back up anything you said, ans still haven't got over it is see. 

Remember the advise I gave you? You should use it.  

1 minute ago, didierforever said:

Ya. I feel like having one right now. 

To be perfectly honest, I don't think he is all there. He's on here talking to himself atm. I've already said I ain't getting drawn into it, but he's still going at it with me.

7 minutes ago, didierforever said:

Ya. I feel like having one right now. 

Tick tock, still waiting for you to back up your accusation  

but we all know your not because you simply can't back up a complete and utter lie.

 

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by pacquiao

3 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

To be perfectly honest, I don't think he is all there. He's on here talking to himself atm. I've already said I ain't getting drawn into it, but he's still going at it with me.

Seriously feel for the guy! 

5 minutes ago, didierforever said:

Seriously feel for the guy! 

Oh the irony. 

7 minutes ago, didierforever said:

Seriously feel for the guy! 

So now he "reports" me and I get this message in my inbox from this fool:

 

"I have reported you just so you know, using mental health as an insult is no laughing matter, you made a false accusation about me and when asked to back it up you insult me in such a vile way. I hope no one close to you ever suffers with mental illness."