No turbulence in here then. All calm.

1 minute ago, Osgood is Good said:

So now he "reports" me and I get this message in my inbox from this fool:

 

"I have reported you just so you know, using mental health as an insult is no laughing matter, you made a false accusation about me and when asked to back it up you insult me in such a vile way. I hope no one close to you ever suffers with mental illness."

I used the "ignore" option. Try that. 

This thread is so entertaining , ill laugh my ass off if we ended with neither of them

6 minutes ago, Barrettinator said:

No turbulence in here then. All calm.

@pacquiao I'm gonna follow you dude. Wherever you post comedy ensues 

10 minutes ago, Osgood is Good said:

So now he "reports" me and I get this message in my inbox from this fool:

 

"I have reported you just so you know, using mental health as an insult is no laughing matter, you made a false accusation about me and when asked to back it up you insult me in such a vile way. I hope no one close to you ever suffers with mental illness."

Yes I have reported you, mental health is no joke.

You're a GRASS. You give it but can't take it

2 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

@pacquiao I'm gonna follow you dude. Wherever you post comedy ensues 

I can't help it when people start making up lies, I have to call them out for it, as you can see niether of them can back up their accusations.

1 minute ago, Osgood is Good said:

You're a GRASS. You give it but can't take it

Give what? I remember apologising to you the other day, and you come in here making false accusations and then insult me. If you can't back up what you say then don't say anything. It's that simple 

20 minutes ago, didierforever said:

I used the "ignore" option. Try that. 

Cheers, yeah added that fool.

How old is he to run to mods and grass, on a forum, what a f**king child. The thing is, I was talking to you not him/himself/he. I said the other day he would have an argument with his reflection........and sure enough !!!!

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by Osgood is Good

43 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

I can't help it when people start making up lies, I have to call them out for it, as you can see niether of them can back up their accusations.

Yea, you have to call them out. No other way 

15 minutes ago, TheChelseaBlues said:

Yea, you have to call them out. No other way 

You are on my ignore list

On ?09?/?05?/?2017 at 11:00, Cfc01976 said:

He is not good enough for Chelsea.... there is a reason we got rid of him once... I wouldn't give u 7 million for him let alone 70 million.. never scores in big games... u show me a video against any top five team where he has shown he is worth that sort of money like costa has....

We got rid of him when he was 21 and he has gone and scored bucket loads of goals. 3 years later down the line he has improved most aspects of his play. Not the finished article but a much better player and striker than the one we sold. He is on 24 league goals and you can guarantee that will be at least 25 come tomorrow night. His record is not good against big teams but in general Everton are piss poor against the big teams and by the time Lukaku is 30 I am sure we will be looking back on his career and having a high number of stats where he has scored against big teams.

Is KDB not good enough for us because we sold him? He is not one of the best players in the league and Europe.

On ?08?/?05?/?2017 at 11:43, pacquiao said:

Theres no way we'd spunk £60 mil on Morata and not start him. He is a guy Conte has wanted for a long time, Lukaku will be the one on the bench under Conte, he would probably get more minutes on the pitch than Batshuayi though. 

 

Lukaku will not join and be on the bench. That is just ludicrous thinking, seriously. The only way Lukaku will be benched is if he starts regularly and continues to underperform like Solado did at Spurs. And yeah you can say same thing as Morata too, but if we sign both, both players will want assurances that they will be leading the line. Especially Lukaku. If Lukaku joins, it is one because he wants to play for us and 2 because he knows he will be leading his line. The next move he makes is big for him so wherever he goes next season, he will be the leading striker. This thread is going around in circles but wherever Lukaku ends up next season, he will be the no.1 striker. The only way he will be on the bench, is if his form goes consistently on a downward spiral and I don't think it will happen because, he is a goalscorer and improving his overall player.

@didierforever @Osgood is Good honestly lads, there's no point trying to have a logical conversation with him. Whatever point you make, however justified it is he'll move the goal posts to suit his view. You could be talking on a completely different thread and he'd still bring up Lukaku, definitely got denied an autograph by him or something and holds a grudge 

10 hours ago, SydneyChelsea said:

Like it or not you when you compare pros and cons you are making a statistical judgement. You are judging each player by a set of observations. That's statistics. 

So, again, I'm still not sure about your original argument which appears to be that context is important for Lukaku's performances, but not for Morata.

 

 

to make a statistical judgement there needs to be numerical data involved. so no, you're wrong, use a blood dictionary as your pseudo definition wont work here - and anyway, now you're just arguing for the sake of it.

my judgements are based on what is best for chelsea in my opinion.

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by MTF

2 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

@didierforever @Osgood is Good honestly lads, there's no point trying to have a logical conversation with him. Whatever point you make, however justified it is he'll move the goal posts to suit his view. You could be talking on a completely different thread and he'd still bring up Lukaku, definitely got denied an autograph by him or something and holds a grudge 

I hear you fella. He is on another planet, and it is like talking to multiple personalties. I did not actually engage with him after my last experience, so he grassed me up to the mods. What a wanchor

42 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said:

@didierforever @Osgood is Good honestly lads, there's no point trying to have a logical conversation with him. Whatever point you make, however justified it is he'll move the goal posts to suit his view. You could be talking on a completely different thread and he'd still bring up Lukaku, definitely got denied an autograph by him or something and holds a grudge 

Oh dear, you still upset because I speak the truth about your idol, you have an unhealthy obsession with such a mediocre player, the fact you actually think someone who doesn't rate Lukaku must have some sort of grudge against him as there is no other reason to not rate him is hilarious. 

But fact is Lukaku is never going to make it at Chelsea simply not good enough, but you keep living in your dreamland if it makes you happy. 

7 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

Oh dear, you still upset because I speak the truth about your idol, you have an unhealthy obsession with such a mediocre player, the fact you actually think someone who doesn't rate Lukaku must have some sort of grudge against him as there is no other reason to not rate him is hilarious. 

But fact is Lukaku is never going to make it at Chelsea simply not good enough, but you keep living in your dreamland if it makes you happy. 

24 league goals for a "mediocre player" is not bad and the bolded section is an opinion and not a fact. You hopefully are left with egg on your face.

Just now, STATS said:

24 league goals for a "mediocre player" is not bad and the bolded section is an opinion and not a fact. You hopefully are left with egg on your face.

Andy Johnson once score 21 league goals for Crystal Palace, Kevin Philipps once scored 30 league goals for Sunderland doesn't mean they wasn't mediocre players, there are countless examples of mediocre players who score goals for small clubs around Europe. Doesn't mean they can do it at a top club.

Clearly you don't have any aspirations to see Chelsea competing in Europe with the likes of Real Madrid if you're hoping Lukaku becomes Chelsea's first choice striker.  luckily for us though Conte is Chelsea manager and I don't believe he will allow the club to take such a big backwards step.

13 hours ago, RIP Mourinho said:

By most areas i assume you mean finishing. You surely can't be making an argument for Costa even being a competent dribbler or able to hold onto a ball.

Not dribbling, but his hold up play is decent. An in form Costa is a player any team would want, the issue with him is not that a particular area of skill is not there, it's simply consistency. He can lose his head for long spells and play whole games when all he does is roll around on the floor and argue with the ref. 

23 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

Andy Johnson once score 21 league goals for Crystal Palace, Kevin Philipps once scored 30 league goals for Sunderland doesn't mean they wasn't mediocre players, there are countless examples of mediocre players who score goals for small clubs around Europe. Doesn't mean they can do it at a top club.

Clearly you don't have any aspirations to see Chelsea competing in Europe with the likes of Real Madrid if you're hoping Lukaku becomes Chelsea's first choice striker.  luckily for us though Conte is Chelsea manager and I don't believe he will allow the club to take such a big backwards step.

Your argument makes no sense. Every young player has to progress from somewhere, most of the worlds top players would have played in a smaller team at the start of their career. Think of the countless successes we have had buying from smaller clubs. Hazard, Kanté, Lampard, Drogba to name a few. 

37 minutes ago, STATS said:

24 league goals for a "mediocre player" is not bad and the bolded section is an opinion and not a fact. You hopefully are left with egg on your face.

Nah mate, his delusion is so deeply embedded it is not curable

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by Osgood is Good

9 minutes ago, Jackbuchanan said:

*Your argument makes no sense. Every young player has to progress from somewhere, most of the worlds top players would have played in a smaller team at the start of their career. Think of the countless successes we have had buying from smaller clubs. Hazard, Kanté, Lampard, Drogba to name a few. 

*You recognised as well. Must be about the 7th person just on this thread to come to the same conclusion, but according to him, it's everyone else.

Just don't hurt his feelings, as he will grass you up to the mods, and then keep on sending "love letters" to your inbox.

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by Osgood is Good

Just now, Osgood is Good said:

*You recognised as well. Must be about the 7th person just on this thread to come to the same conclusion, but according to him, it's everyone else.

this isn't a democracy so get that mob mentality outta here! the whole forum could be against him and that wouldn't make him wrong as we're all entitled to an opinion.

at the end of the day there is a clear narrative here - no one can say anything negative about lukaku and if you do, then you must be bias!

i dare ya m8, i fookin' dare ya to say lukaku has the touch of a donkey m8 see what happenz!

20 minutes ago, MTF said:

this isn't a democracy so get that mob mentality outta here! the whole forum could be against him and that wouldn't make him wrong as we're all entitled to an opinion.

at the end of the day there is a clear narrative here - no one can say anything negative about lukaku and if you do, then you must be bias!

i dare ya m8, i fookin' dare ya to say lukaku has the touch of a donkey m8 see what happenz!

No mob mentality from me. He has been arguing with several today, and I was pointing out that it was yet another person experiencing the nonsense. For the record which I have said on here previously, I am not a great fan of Lukaku !!!

There are many who have tried to reason with him. Unsuccessfully. Thanks for your input.

Edited May 11, 20179 yr by Osgood is Good