This made me so angry.

What the f**k is Kenyon doing grinning and leading our boys up before taking a medal. Compare that slimy greaseball with Charlton who led the United players up and refused a medal as he realises its all about the players.

Absolutely disgraceful from Kenyon.

Sir Bobby took a medal, he just refused to have it put around his neck.

This made me so angry.

What the *delightful intercourse* is Kenyon doing grinning and leading our boys up before taking a medal. Compare that slimy greaseball with Charlton who led the United players up and refused a medal as he realises its all about the players.

Absolutely disgraceful from Kenyon.

Why shouldn't he smile? He's just seen his team win the CL.

Sir Bobby took a medal, he just refused to have it put around his neck.

Still, its a lot more classy than Kenyon.

What was he doing up there in the first place. He has no real link with our team and very few like him.

A corporate winner for a corporate event

He deserved to be up there at some point, but not leading us, and certainly not with a big grin on his face. Thought to me it looked like the kind of grin you force for the cameras when really you feel sh*t on the inside

Someone else on Five Live mentioned this and asked what the hell Kenyon was doing first up out of EVERYONE to get a medal around his neck.

I haven't seen the idiot all season practically and yet there he is grinning and getting a medal.

At least Sir Bobby had the grace to take the plaque but refuse the medal around his neck.

Since when do people like Kenyon get medals?

Quite bizarre.

Since when do people like Kenyon get medals?

Quite bizarre.

He probably thought it was Businessman of the Year award or something.

It looks like Sheva refused to get his medal.

It looks like Sheva refused to get his medal.

where did you hear that?

It looks like Sheva refused to get his medal.

where did you hear that?

He wasn't among those who did. I've checked twice on DVR. Platini gave Grant extra medal at the end.

The extra one given to Grant was for Drogba, wasn't it?

He wasn't among those who did. I've checked twice on DVR. Platini gave Grant extra medal at the end.

That was for Riise!

Speaking of Sheva i was amazed he wasnt involved at least for the penalties

The extra one given to Grant was for Drogba, wasn't it?

May be he gave couple extras.

Speaking of Sheva i was amazed he wasnt involved at least for the penalties

Roman would remind Grant that, when he sack him.

Speaking of Sheva i was amazed he wasnt involved at least for the penalties

Roman would remind Grant that, when he sack him.

he had made three subs- the first two were tactical, the last one was to take a pen. he brought on belletti. who scored. what's the argument?

Blue Chelsea

For Chelsea's England midfielder Frank Lampard there was another emotional rollercoaster ride just weeks after his mother died, as he scored the equaliser and then a penalty in the shootout, only to see the Champions League just like the Premier League go to United.

"It's a small detail that loses you a game, John (Terry) slipped for the penalty," said Lampard. "No-one could deny that after 30 minutes we dominated the game.

"However we have to take it on the chin. I'm not being bitter but it's hard to take. United have won the Champions League against the better team.

"Terry should not be criticised as he stood up to take the penalty and there aren't many centre-backs who would do that," Lampard went on. "It has been a very hard time for me. It is unfortunate that the Champions League final has come this year when I'm having a tough time.

"Football has kept me focused on something. We'll (Chelsea) come back stronger. We are a team of giants. It's so frustrating that a penalty has decided it," added Lampard, whose club manager Avram Grant threw his losers medal into the midst of Chelsea supporters.

http://www.fifa.com

i ws disgusted when i saw kenyon lead the lads up, and what the f**k was he smiling for

oh yeah

he's a manc through and through and the only reason he's at the bridge is for romans money

sheva should have come on instead of anelka, who you now have to say has been a massive disappointment since he joined us and capped it by that weak pen...it was in the stars for sheva to do something

sheva should have come on instead of anelka, who you now have to say has been a massive disappointment since he joined us and capped it by that weak pen...it was in the stars for sheva to do something

At least it dispells the myth that Roman influences the managment.

Speaking of Sheva i was amazed he wasnt involved at least for the penalties

Roman would remind Grant that, when he sack him.

he had made three subs- the first two were tactical, the last one was to take a pen. he brought on belletti. who scored. what's the argument?

He should of subbed Drogba for Sheva after 75 mins, he looked knackered and frustarted.

The dignity of Bobby Charlton, the self obsession of Kenyon

Speaks volumes

He should of subbed Drogba for Sheva after 75 mins, he looked knackered and frustarted.

that's a different argument, which I'm not sure I agree.

what he's saying is "sack grant because he didn't bring on sheva to take a pen", even though the guy he brought on instead scored.

He should of subbed Drogba for Sheva after 75 mins, he looked knackered and frustarted.

that's a different argument, which I'm not sure I agree.

what he's saying is "sack grant because he didn't bring on sheva to take a pen", even though the guy he brought on instead scored.

Sack Grant ?

laman come on, we were inches/minutes from a THE double, get a grip.

what he's saying is "sack grant because he didn't bring on sheva to take a pen", even though the guy he brought on instead scored.

No, Anelka missed.

But that doesn't even matter now. It's stupid to go through the whole "what if..." stuff, because it's all over, and all we could do is look forward to the next season.