So if the shaggee won't get another job in sport, what about the shagger???

My money is on JT but then again Courtois is not exactly innocent.

Oh well .chant for Saturday will be a resounding "Who Shagged Eva " and we will see who looks the most guilty on the pitch ............now if all of them drop there heads in guilt we might have the mother of all punch ups on the pitch .................

I

My guess would be Eden.

JT would have (should have) learned his lesson.

Shagger, shaggee, 'who shagged Eva'. Surely both parties assume both roles of shagger shaggee?

Just a thought, perhaps Eva's other was Mrs FSW that really would rile Jose.

I

My guess would be Eden.

JT would have (should have) learned his lesson.

Shagger, shaggee, 'who shagged Eva'. Surely both parties assume both roles of shagger shaggee?

Just a thought, perhaps Eva's other was Mrs FSW that really would rile Jose.

It was definitely Essien, the shapes he was throwing at Eva after the CL win were . . . . suggestive

My guess would be Eden.

 

Married with a kid and he's your best guess? Why would you think so?

Married with a kid and he's your best guess? Why would you think so?

Best has nothing to do with it, random is more accurate, but I think most of the team have wags and children, sadly that doesn't stop some.

Just google, Eva Caneiro and Chelsea footballer !

 

Actually don't bother the story I read the other day appears to have been removed...Hmmm

Edited October 2, 201510 yr by SHELLY

Just google, Eva Caneiro and Chelsea footballer !

 

Why would I do that?

"Why would I do that?"

 

To find out who the rumours were about ?

 

Or not if you're not interested..!

Edited October 2, 201510 yr by SHELLY

Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho played a straight bat when asked about the controversy over former team doctor Eva Carneiro.

Mourinho has been cleared of making discriminatory comments to Carneiro, who has since left the club. "For the last two months I did not open my mouth and I will keep like this,” he said. “One day I will speak, and I will choose that day.”

Asked about FA chief Greg Dyke’s comments that he should apologise, Mourinho replied: “That’s the same answer. I am quiet about it for a long time. I read, and listen, and watch, and I am quiet.”

Responding to a suggestion that commenting might help the issue go away, he said: “I can be here all day. My chance to speak will come.”

"Why would I do that?"

 

To find out who the rumours were about ?

 

That would mean I'm actually interested in finding out about rumours that may or may not be true.

Good on Jose he's damned if he speaks up, and damned if he doesn't.

IF she has been involved with one of the team and IF that were to be Ivan wouldn't Jose have taken him off the pitch. It doesn't make sense as I can't see Jose condoning such a thing IF true.

I don't think he swore at her/him did he? He swore yes, but not at anyone in particular.

swearing wasn't the problem. It was suggested he made sexist comments, but he has been cleared of that

IF she has been involved with one of the team and IF that were to be Ivan wouldn't Jose have taken him off the pitch. It doesn't make sense as I can't see Jose condoning such a thing IF true.

but Ivan shouldn't be playing anyway. The radio just said 80% of our goal against have come down his side of the pitch.

Agreed, none of us will ever know what went on, we just go with the latest rumour, if there is any truth in the rumours I don't think it will ever come out.

Eva will get a settlement with a gagging clause no doubt

Why are we assuming she has bedded one of our players?

Her embittered ex-boyfriend said so, so it may well be a pack of lies. I expect she'll be suing him, I know I would if I were in her position.

Her embittered ex-boyfriend said so, so it may well be a pack of lies. I expect she'll be suing him, I know I would if I were in her position.

She could only sue if untrue!

^^^ Correct^^^

Ah yes, I remember reading that, The Sun wasnt it?

If there is anything to it, it will come out if and when she tries to sue.

If she doesnt, I hope whatever is keeping Jose shtum wont be a factor any more and he tells us what the score is.

Edited October 2, 201510 yr by Zola

^^^ Correct as well, not a paper known for veracity. 

Carneiro's statement:

 

"I was surprised to learn that the FA was allegedly investigating the incident of 8 August via the press. 

 

"I was at no stage requested by the FA to make a statement. I wonder whether this might be the only formal investigation in this country where the evidence of the individuals involved in the incident was not considered relevant. 

 

"Choosing to ignore some of the evidence will surely influence the outcome of the findings."

 

 "Last season I had a similar experience at a game at West Ham FC, where I was subject to verbal abuse. Following complaints by the public, the FA produced a communication to the press saying there had been no sexist chanting during this game. 

 

"At no time was I approached for a statement despite the fact that vile unacceptable, sexually explicit abuse was clearly heard. 

 

"It is incidents such as these and the lack of support from the football authorities that make it so difficult for women in the game. 

 

"I admire what Heather Rabbatts has done and thank her and friends and colleagues who have supported me at this very difficult time."

Personally, I don't care who is shagging who, its none of my business , although good for banter in the pub, no one has a right to know about the private affairs of others.

Unless you are a Sun journalist it doesn't matter surely ?

Wow that's quite a statement she's basically given both barrels to the F.A. And highlighted their hypocrisy (well that's how I'm reading it)

I agree mileoffside, but if there were any future tribunals it might affect the outcome, bearing in mind her job as team doctor. Not sure if there are rules in place about that sort of thing.

 

 

(sorry the quote button only works on my phone not my pc)

Carneiro's statement:

 

"I was surprised to learn that the FA was allegedly investigating the incident of 8 August via the press. 

 

"I was at no stage requested by the FA to make a statement. I wonder whether this might be the only formal investigation in this country where the evidence of the individuals involved in the incident was not considered relevant. 

 

"Choosing to ignore some of the evidence will surely influence the outcome of the findings."

 

 "Last season I had a similar experience at a game at West Ham FC, where I was subject to verbal abuse. Following complaints by the public, the FA produced a communication to the press saying there had been no sexist chanting during this game. 

 

"At no time was I approached for a statement despite the fact that vile unacceptable, sexually explicit abuse was clearly heard. 

 

"It is incidents such as these and the lack of support from the football authorities that make it so difficult for women in the game. 

 

"I admire what Heather Rabbatts has done and thank her and friends and colleagues who have supported me at this very difficult time."

wow ! The Guardian today say she was approached but declined to appear !

f**k sake, I hope this isn't going to become an issue again, Rabbets is a professional moaner and complainer, and Dyke needs to get his own house in order instead of hopping on the nearest bandwagon.

Wow that's quite a statement she's basically given both barrels to the F.A. And highlighted their hypocrisy (well that's how I'm reading it)

actually reading it again you are right, a blast at the FA and Dyke's investigation team

Great, that ball has been booted back into his court.