I can see us taking him on loan, apparently Klopp feels he cant work with him, and has told him to find a club as he will not give him any minutes this season if he stays, i rate Sakho, on his day he is a beast, i wont be surprised if we sign him tomorrow. 

 

 

He's been terrible in this league if we are being honest. I liked him in France but he just seems a bit of a bomb scare in the Luiz mould.

Of course right now we'd take just about anyone at CB due to the lack of numbers but I doubt Sakho will be here on Thursday.

Edited August 30, 20169 yr by Chelsbear

I don't/didn't want us to sign him permanently but given our lack of depth a loan with a buy option does start to make sense now that Koulibaly and Romagnoli are seemingly off the radar for now. If he is to sign I just hope he cuts out the social media BS...

Edited August 30, 20169 yr by the special one

No chance...he's Shrek's mate...are we there yet..? are we there yet..?

can't wait until he and diego got into a fistfight in the dressing room, probably a three way fight with conte too

He's actually a good player with apparently a terrible attitude. Certainly good enough to be a backup.

He'd be an upgrade on Dildobodji.

He would have been first choice for France at the Euro's if he never had that drug test incident.

Noooooooooooo...... Just No................

1 minute ago, pacquiao said:

He would have been first choice for France at the Euro's if he never had that drug test incident.

Varne would have been first choice had he not suffered an injury.

If it's a year-long loan then I can't see any harm in it. If it all goes wrong then we can cut our losses. 

Caveat may be Liverpool don't want to loan him to a rival for a CL place, if they asked us for Cahill on loan I'd hope we'd tell them to get f**ked.

Edited August 30, 20169 yr by the special one

Is this how low we've sunk?

14 minutes ago, Chelsbear said:

Varne would have been first choice had he not suffered an injury.

but he was injured. which is why Sakho would have been 1st choice

15 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

but he was injured. which is why Sakho would have been 1st choice

15 minutes ago, pacquiao said:

but he was injured. which is why Sakho would have been 1st choice

Zouma would have been in there too i think had he not got injured.

Just now, Scott Harris said:

Zouma would have been in there too i think had he not got injured.

yeah but Sakho is ahead of him for France

1 hour ago, pacquiao said:

but he was injured. which is why Sakho would have been 1st choice

And Sakho failed a drug test 

it's all its and buts

at this rate, why not

a huge gamble but would much prefer taking him on loan with option to buy than bringing back luiz

he's indeed pretty good last season, attitude's a big worry tho, especially for someone very demanding like conte

Edited August 31, 20169 yr by havelschayes

There are much worse CBs out there than him. Wouldn't mind the loan but only as a last resort at 10:45 tonight