So 40 million on Drinkwater, 15 million on Barkley, 23 million on Emerson and roughly the same on Zappacosta have all been value for money because they are youngish?
I would rather have seen Loftus-Cheek fill Drinkwaters role but that’s just my opinion.
As good as Giroud has been would he have bothered moving if he didn’t want to play in a World Cup this summer?
This reminds me of the time we signed players like Tal Ben Haim because we tried to do good business lol. I know for one I would accept a fifth place finish if we started to transition in a few of the young lads rather than spunk money on average players.