I decided to take a look on Skysports to see If they talk about the blatant elbow to Giroud face, but nope nothing really mentioned the main focus is placed elsewhere so once again because Toon aren't perceived as a big club their players will be able to get away with this, yet when Costa stamps on someone there are reports about it by everyone AND Costa gets banned for it...

Lets not forget that when Troy Deeney flipped a section of away fans off he got no punishment for it, kinda shows the true colours of the people that are in charge.

4 minutes ago, Keitha313 said:

I decided to take a look on Skysports to see If they talk about the blatant elbow to Giroud face, but nope nothing really mentioned the main focus is placed elsewhere so once again because Toon aren't perceived as a big club their players will be able to get away with this, yet when Costa stamps on someone there are reports about it by everyone AND Costa gets banned for it...

Lets not forget that when Troy Deeney flipped a section of away fans off he got no punishment for it, kinda shows the true colours of the people that are in charge.

This kind of Chelsea treatment by the media has been going on for so long that, it is part of what is considered normal. I will be more worried if they start supporting us.

Persoanlly I think it says a lot about how good we have things as Chelsea fans that people have to go searching for little things like this to get upset about.

Try listening to skysports highest earners and not the keyboard spud fan sky employee typing out that sh*te........, J.Redknapp has said definitely a penalty, and newcastle basically deserved to lose playing negative football.

^the ref backs Redknapp who has seen the video and said if he had VAR he would still have called for a penalty.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-6100065/Newcastle-1-2-Chelsea-Yedlins-goal-hands-Maurizio-Sarri-win.html

 

A pretty fair reflection of the game in the Mail.

46 minutes ago, charierre said:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-6100065/Newcastle-1-2-Chelsea-Yedlins-goal-hands-Maurizio-Sarri-win.html

 

A pretty fair reflection of the game in the Mail.

Surprising to read that.

We got a lot of stick over the years for playing defensively, whether it was that away performance at city, Jenas claiming the team who dominated possession deserve to win, or back to when mourinho was labelled the enemy of football, we have been hit with the lot.

So it's nice to see some consistency from the media in that regard. 

It wasn't pretty, Newcastle didn't want to make it a game of football, which I found it surprising given how open they played against spurs.

We will never get credit. Even if we won the quadruple there would be negativity. I don't get it tbh. 

2 hours ago, big blue said:

Surprising to read that.

We got a lot of stick over the years for playing defensively, whether it was that away performance at city, Jenas claiming the team who dominated possession deserve to win, or back to when mourinho was labelled the enemy of football, we have been hit with the lot.

So it's nice to see some consistency from the media in that regard. 

It wasn't pretty, Newcastle didn't want to make it a game of football, which I found it surprising given how open they played against spurs.

Yeah they are consistent in dictating what deserves respect in football, all we now need is to go bankrupt, rebuild and win the league with a squad of kids from the youth academy and then we'll the darlings of football.

I don't listen to anything on skysports or most bias media they have hated Chelsea since day one and will continue to do so