Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by yorkleyblue

  1. And did f**k all against a sh*t team. Get a f**king grip on reality
  2. new boy, glory-hunting plastic w**ker - f**k off back to city or wherever, coming in here with your in-depth knowledge gleaned from Sky sports and google
  3. You won away from home in a european knockout competition - what more do you want you spoilt f**k?
  4. Bummer that we scored from one, then What exactly did he do?
  5. What do you mean "about 6 months?" Still very fashionable round here.
  6. and strolled around, missing passes, losing the ball and generally just replicating what most of the team had been doing for the first hour. I would have expected just a little bit of "look at me, boss, I'm better than these w**kers you have been picking for most of the season" but we didn't get that. Boy really gotta take whatever chances he gets. Like I said, sometimes he's almost unplayable when he can be arsed, a lot of the time doesn't look like he deserves to be in the squad. I mean, honestly @Nibs, you or I would put more effort in.
  7. And they have an incredible Cuban Salsa Congress Weekender there every year.
  8. I'd argue with your list of ones showing consistency as well. The only ones who are consistent are Kante (almost consistently running, like the Duracell bunny) and Giroud, consistently not quite there at the right time or in the right place.
  9. But that's not a snappy over-simplistic one-liner cliche
  10. Ampadu does it a huge amount too.
  11. I'm not going through all this again with you. You know my position on this. If Willian doesn't fit into your playstation FIFA way of seeing things, that's your problem, not mine nor his. You appear to have a personal dislike of the player, for whatever reason, and so twist and distort facts and opinions to suit that. Professionals in the world or real-life football, not those fiddling on their keyboards and watching on hooky streams rate the player. That's good enough for me. I'm not playing this game any more with you. You know what I think, and you know why I think you are wrong. Leave it at that. But, I'm glad that you know the inner workings of Sarri's mind. Must make it so much easier to be so certain about everything.
  12. I'm not arguing with that, it's like everything, consistency is key. We can't have the entire forum going up in flames about the inconsistency of various scapegoats of the day on one hand and then saying that our chosen "great new hope" of the day can be inconsistent because we like him. I agree he should be ahead of Barkley, maybe even Kovacic, or at least sharing time with him, but how long before we all turn on him if he phones in three or four consecutive performances like Sunday's. Like I said earlier, sometimes you'd think he was the future of our Champions League winning side, dominating Europe and the Premier league for a decade, and sometimes he looks like he's never met his team mates or a football before, and can't be arsed to learn. I really do hope it's the first.
  13. 30 against 22? Out of how many games played so far? And in the bigger games? How well has that worked out, then? The only positive I can take from Sunday was that not too many idiots in here were putting all the blame on Willian
  14. Ok, so find some positive ones as well, for just a tiny little bit of balance, eh?
  15. doesn't fit the narrative, mate
  16. me neither. Someone who's girlfriend Willian stole when they were in primary school together commented on why he was bought. I said why I though he was bought. But, whether he's Sarri's favourite or not, I don't know. Judging by appearances, more so than Pedro. Judging on whether Sarri takes him out bowling and buys him pizza, I don't have sufficient evidence to make a call either way
  17. You might not have seen the matches, then, or were maybe a bit young at the time, I don't know, but he played amazingly against us, and, as far as I have seen in here, you are the only one who argues that fact. Don't know if we were a bit sh*t TBH. depends on your definition of sh*t. Playing regularly in Europe, sh*t, or losing to Bournemouth two seasons on the trot sh*t. In either case, we played against Willian and professional football people, you know, people who's livelihoods depend on it, decided that his performance was so good that we had to go and buy him. (No, Teixeira was nowhere near as good and never on anyone's radar as far as I was aware, as can be seen by his subsequent career) You might well be able to use google to support your snide and dismissive sarcasm, by picking the silliest of purchases in that season, but why, in the interests of balance, didn't you also mention Matic, Schurrle, Salah and E'to in that purchasing season?? (Oh, and are you really saying that Moses was sh*t buy too?) Every manager plays him because he performs a valuable role in a team game. Maybe not the role you might want him to play, but very much a role that professional football managers, as opposed to you playing football manager on your playstation, want him to play.
  18. So, which is it? They haven't had a "proper chance" (copyright all the top club managers who are members of this forum) or they are better then those they would replace? What "current form" are you judging Christensen on? He's hardly played. Same for Emerson. I'd agree about CHO, exciting, if a bit raw. RLC I'm still not convinced about. Sometimes he looks something special, sometimes he just looks like a lazy lump with the touch of a baby elephant. On Sunday, he might as well have not come on and let us play with 10 men, a couple of games earlier in the season he looked like a nailed-on first team starter and game changer. That's what is so frustrating about him.
  19. FFS, do you just spend your time trawling the internet for any and every negative thing you can find about our club? It's getting f**king wearing now. You rarely ever seem to post anything else but snide quotes from sh*t-hole sources of bollocks, places like The Sun, FFS, or Matt Law, or The Mail.
  20. Not getting at you @brownindian in any way, more the doom-merchants who now see OGS's United as being on a par with 1970's Brazil, but, I'll say it again, United haven't played anyone decent in that run to overtake us, and I believe that their board looked at the fixture list and decided that was the ideal time to sack Mourinho because, whoever or whatever took over was going to get near maximum points from that run of fixtures. Look what happened last night, the first time they have come up against a decent team. f**ked over was what they were. Some people need to get some semblance of reality, look at the overall picture and stop being such fannies about 1 point off fourth at this stage of the season and still in all three cups. And they need to take your emboldened part into account as well.
  21. No need for apologies,mate, I wasn't moaning about you, but about our wonderful press, using that picture when they could have used a picture of Willian and Giroud or any of the others actually involved.

  • Create New...