yorkleyblue

What are you going to do with your speculum and a pumpkin? Recreate one of the scenes from the 1970's porn classic Big Fanny's Stretching Exercises for Middle-aged Women?

Not going to quote it all back at you again, @Scott Harris, but well said. You have way more patience than me to interact with these trolls.

Yet another genius sneaking back in after being banned and giving themselves away with the name and style of posting :) Some of these teenagers really aren't very bright. I blame Thatcher.

Has someone come back after a third banning?

Does tickle me, people sitting at home, moaning about the atmosphere.

No, he missed a sitter at the weekend.

Wouldn't know Munky, I get really bored with the same old, same old. Give me something new and well-written and I'm a happy bunny. Give me a talking rabbit who is also an international concert pianist and assassin and I'd rather smear scotch bonnet paste in my eyes. Nothing, but nothing, beats an 8 year-old edition of Bargain Hunt, mind.

I'm now confused. I thought you wanted to have Michy's babies, but I'm getting mixed signals at the moment. Young people's bromances are very difficult to understand for us more mature gentlemen.

No, that's even worse. Decent drama for adults once the kids have gone to bed, or a proper fillum, like the old days" Or both, I understand there are more than 2 channels these days. But put the cartoons on the Watch with Mother slot in the afternoons, if you have to. Apparently, all this dragons and talking dogs and snakes that can both fly and juggle are, according to Jack Rowling, w**kium Childissimus. (I had to google that!)

Exactly that. And we could have an audio montage released for Christmas of Rooney;s interactions with officialdom over the years and a grime remix of JT and his words of leadership and wisdom.

Still sh*te though. When you score you want to be able to celebrare immediately and without fear you will look a tit in 3 minutes time after a ref has stood around with his hand to his ear to find out 'if there is any reason why he can't award a goal' True - where we f**k up is in the "clear and obvious" bit. In the rugby, mostly they seem to get it right and only use it when it's too close to call straight away. We seem to be reviewing every goal to see if we can go back far enough to find a reason to disallow it, rather than only if there is an obvious infringement. Linespersons are frightened to raise their flag now in case they get laughed at or overturned. In my view, both the Watford twat and Callum made the most of minimal contact, probably neither one was a dive and both could have been given as penalties or just waved away. In the old days, the ref would have made the decision immediately, one way or the other, and we would have had merry japes in here discussing one way or the other for days. Would have given us a chance to shout abuse from the stands (or not) as well. But even then, these decisions were made based on an individual ref's opinion, and most of them can at best be described as incompetent, so there never has been any consistency, which I think is what VAR was brought in to achieve. But then I also think that the miking up of referees in rugby is a great thing that we should bring in. Let the whole stadium hear some of the lame excuses coming from both refs and players.

I really do struggle with so-called "adult" TV which has talking dogs and dragons and the like. Could never understand grown-ups rabbiting on about Harry Potter, and Doctor w**king Who. I think that prime time BBC 1 programs should not be childrens' shows, there's a whole world of CBBCs for that.

I'd get rid of it entirely and just go back to accepting mistakes happen and manning up. It's f**king terrible But those rugby bastards manage to use it without the errors and the delays, so it can be done properly.

ELO, now there is the very definition of style over substance. A band of their time with one great single, and living on it ever since.

It was an Achilles, not an ACL, wasn't it?

P-Funk Radio on Tunein on Alexa

L'Engrenages is back on BBC 4

Don't keep on repeating this calumny. I said nothing offensive and got called a c**t by someone who has history for viciously abusing people in this forum, and got banned last time for some very nasty misogynistic abuse of female members. I observed an irony, nothing more. Any road up, not getting into this any more. One nasty f**ker and one nosy interfering busybody on the ignore list and I'll move on.

You're right, Munky, no point asking me, I've never argued with another person in my life

I think that's the point. You've dismissed them, you haven't rebutted them with anything like, oh, i don't know, facts or something? Oh, yes, you do have the world of TV punditry on your side, don't you? No, actually you don't. Unless you are counting some muppet who isn't really on mainstream football television.

Once again you feel the need to butt in with inaccurate and personal remarks. I made no such "uncalled for personal insult", I pointed out the irony of someone who's forum persona was based on playing "da youf" calling for some big name purchases. That was about as personal as I got, and got called a c**t for it. This was nothing to do with you, you made it something to do with you and I don't know why you think you had that right, but, as far as I am concerned, I made no attacks, and, even if I did, it has f**k all to do with you so butt the f**k out and mind your own business. If you don't like my "demeaning comments" then by all means feel totally free to put me on your ignore list. It's incredibly easy to do, I have probably the longest ignore list in the forum, and you and "da youf" are going on it as we speak. If you need instruction, let me know, or ask a grown-up.

And you know the opinion of all rival fans, right? Anyway, many people have come up with "a genuine counter argument" above, and you have just ignored them. If it posts like a troll and it trolls like a troll, it probably lives in a dark, dank place.

Well bugger me, that's a stunning surprise, you turning up and poking your beak into a conversation I'm having with other people, just to make your animosity towards me very clear. I never would have expected that, not in a month of Sundays.* *That is a lie.

And I do, but then I haven't made my entire (and very short) presence on this forum about playing "da youf". That's simple as well.

Does that make any sense at all? Just picking a bit of my comment and putting "wakey wakey" on the end doesn't really form a sentence. The delights the social media world, I suppose.